Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic value of SPECT myocardial perfusion entropy in high-risk type 2 diabetic patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Risk stratification of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) remains suboptimal. We hypothesized that myocardial perfusion entropy (MPE) quantified from SPECT myocardial perfusion images may provide incremental prognostic value in T2D patients independently from myocardial ischemia.

Methods

T2D patients with very high and high cardiovascular risk were prospectively included (n = 166, 65 ± 12 years). Stress perfusion defect was quantified by visual evaluation of SPECT MPI. SPECT MPI was also used for the quantification of rest and stress MPE. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and myocardial revascularization > 3 months after SPECT.

Results

Forty-four MACEs were observed during a 4.6-year median follow-up. Significant differences in stress MPE were observed between patients with and without MACEs (4.19 ± 0.46 vs. 3.93 ± 0.40; P ≤ .01). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the risk of MACEs was significantly higher in patients with higher stress MPE (log-rank P ≤ 01). Stress MPE and stress perfusion defect (SSS ≥ 4) were significantly associated with the risk of MACEs (hazard ratio 2.77 and 2.06, respectively, P < .05 for both) after adjustment for clinical and imaging risk predictors as identified from preliminary univariate analysis. MPE demonstrated incremental prognostic value over clinical risk factors, stress test EKG and SSS as evidenced by nested models showing improved Akaike information criterion (AIC), reclassification (global continuous net reclassification improvement [NRI]: 63), global integrated discrimination improvement (IDI: 6%), and discrimination (change in c-statistic: 0.66 vs 0.74).

Conclusions

Stress MPE provided independent and incremental prognostic information for the prediction of MACEs in diabetic patients.

Trial registration number

NCT02316054 (12/12/2014).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herman WH, Zimmet P. Type 2 diabetes: an epidemic requiring global attention and urgent action. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:943–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hachamovitch R, Kang X, Amanullah AM, Abidov A, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, et al. Prognostic implications of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the elderly. Circulation. 2009;120:2197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Machecourt J, Longère P, Fagret D, Vanzetto G, Wolf JE, Polidori C, et al. Prognostic value of thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging according to extent of myocardial defect. Study in 1,926 patients with follow-up at 33 months. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:1096–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vanzetto G, Ormezzano O, Fagret D, Comet M, Denis B, Machecourt J. Long-term additive prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical and exercise stress test in low to intermediate risk patients: study in 1137 patients with 6-year follow-up. Circulation. 1999;100:1521–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kang X, Berman DS, Lewin HC, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am Heart J. 1999;138:1025–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berman DS, Kang X, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Abidov A, et al. Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men. Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1125–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourque JM, Patel CA, Ali MM, Perez M, Watson DD, Beller GA. Prevalence and predictors of ischemia and outcomes in outpatients with diabetes mellitus referred for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:466–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM, Cendes F. Texture analysis of medical images. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:1061–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hatt M, Tixier F, Pierce L, Kinahan PE, Le Rest CC, Visvikis D. Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:151–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Muthalaly RG, Kwong RY, John RM, van der Geest R, Tao Q, Schaeffer B, et al. Left ventricular entropy is a novel predictor of arrhythmic events in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy receiving defibrillators for primary prevention. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinzpeter R, Wagner MW, Wurnig MC, Seifert B, Manka R, Alkadhi H. Texture analysis of acute myocardial infarction with CT: first experience study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0186876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abidov A, Germano G, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS. Gated SPECT in assessment of regional and global left ventricular function: major tool of modern nuclear imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:261–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naya M, Manabe O, Koyanagawa K, Tamaki N. The role of nuclear medicine in assessments of cardiac dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25:1980–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40:237–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanzetto G, Boizel R, Halimi S, Ormezzano O, Belle L, Fagret D, et al. Effects of a myocardial ischaemia-guided therapeutic program on survival and incidence of coronary events in asymptomatic patients with diabetes: the ARCADIA study. Diabetes Metab. 2007;33:459–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Djaileb L, Dubois B, de Leiris N, Leenhardt J, Canu M, Phan Sy O, et al. Prospective diagnostic performance of semiconductor SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: wall thickening analysis reduces the need for an additional prone acquisition. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:2042–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Soneson H, Ubachs JFA, Ugander M, Arheden H, Heiberg E. An improved method for automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson NP, Gould KL. Clinical evaluation of a new concept: resting myocardial perfusion heterogeneity quantified by markovian analysis of PET identifies coronary microvascular dysfunction and early atherosclerosis in 1,034 subjects. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1427–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD: the task force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3035–3087.

  21. Young LH, Wackers FJT, Chyun DA, Davey JA, Barrett EJ, Heller GV, et al. Cardiac outcomes after screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: the DIAD study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301:1547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lièvre MM, Moulin P, Thivolet C, Rodier M, Rigalleau V, Penfornis A, et al. Detection of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic patients with diabetes: results of a randomized trial and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of systematic screening. Trials. 2011;12:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Acampa W, Petretta M, Cuocolo R, Daniele S, Cantoni V, Cuocolo A. Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:50–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Carli MF, Janisse J, Grunberger G, Ager J. Role of chronic hyperglycemia in the pathogenesis of coronary microvascular dysfunction in diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1387–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Gaber M, Hainer J, Klein J, et al. Association between coronary vascular dysfunction and cardiac mortality in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2012;126:1858–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1973;SMC-3:610–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zamboglou C, Carles M, Fechter T, Kiefer S, Reichel K, Fassbender TF, et al. Radiomic features from PSMA PET for non-invasive intraprostatic tumor discrimination and characterization in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer - a comparison study with histology reference. Theranostics. 2019;9:2595–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Results from the present study have been partially presented at the EANM 2019 congress (presentation # EPS-087; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00259-019-04486-2.pdf; https://posterng.netkey.at/eanm/viewing/index.php?module=viewing_poster&task=viewsection&ti=33880).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loïc Djaileb.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the regional ethics committee (CECIC Rhône-Alpes Auvergne) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiology

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 435 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djaileb, L., Seiller, A., Canu, M. et al. Prognostic value of SPECT myocardial perfusion entropy in high-risk type 2 diabetic patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48, 1813–1821 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05110-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05110-4

Keywords

Navigation