Skip to main content
Log in

Letter to the editor: Lassen et al. 3D PET/CT 82Rb PET myocardial blood flow quantification: comparison of half-dose and full-dose protocols

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter To The Editor & Reply to this article was published on 01 September 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lassen ML, Manabe O, Otaki Y, et al. 3D PET/CT 82Rb PET myocardial blood flow quantification: comparison of half-dose and full-dose protocols [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 5]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04811-0.

  2. Murthy VL, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, et al. Clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET: Joint position paper of the SNMMI cardiovascular council and the ASNC. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(2):273–93. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.201368.

  3. Renaud JM, Yip K, Guimond J, et al. Characterization of 3-dimensional PET systems for accurate quantification of myocardial blood flow. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(1):103–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.174565.

  4. Ahmadi A, Klein R, Lewin HC, et al. Rubidium-82 generator yield and efficiency for PET perfusion imaging: Comparison of two clinical systems [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 20]. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02200-6.

  5. Moody JB, Hiller KM, Lee BC, Corbett JR, Ficaro EP, Murthy VL. Limitations of Rb-82 weight-adjusted dosing accuracy at low doses. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(4):1395–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-016-0531-2.

  6. Klein R, Ocneanu A. deKemp RA. Time-frame sampling for 82Rb PET flow quantification: Towards standardization of clinical protocols. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24(5):1530–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0981-1.

  7. Moody JB, Lee BC, Corbett JR, Ficaro EP, Murthy VL. Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22(5):935–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0100-0.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer M. Renaud.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J.M. Renaud and J.B. Moody are employees of INVIA. J.M. Renaud is a consultant for Jubilant DraxImage Inc. and receives royalties from the sales of FlowQuant® software. E.P. Ficaro is an owner and a stockholder of INVIA.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Letter to the Editor

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Renaud, J.M., Moody, J.B. & Ficaro, E.P. Letter to the editor: Lassen et al. 3D PET/CT 82Rb PET myocardial blood flow quantification: comparison of half-dose and full-dose protocols. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 47, 2729–2730 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04950-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04950-4

Navigation