Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

FDG-PET assessment and metabolic patterns in Lafora disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe cerebral glucose metabolism pattern as assessed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in Lafora disease (LD), a rare, lethal form of progressive myoclonus epilepsy caused by biallelic mutations in EPM2A or NHLRC1.

Methods

We retrospectively included patients with genetically confirmed LD who underwent FDG-PET scan referred to three Italian epilepsy centers. FDG-PET images were evaluated both visually and using SPM12 software. Subgroup analysis was performed on the basis of genetic and clinical features employing SPM. Moreover, we performed a systematic literature review of LD cases that underwent FDG-PET assessment.

Results

Eight Italian patients (3M/5F, 3 EPM2A/5 NHLRC1) underwent FDG-PET examination after a mean of 6 years from disease onset (range 1–12 years). All patients showed bilateral hypometabolic areas, more diffuse and pronounced in advanced disease stages. Most frequently, the hypometabolic regions were the temporal (8/8), parietal (7/8), and frontal lobes (7/8), as well as the thalamus (6/8). In three cases, the FDG-PET repeated after a mean of 17 months (range 7–36 months) showed a metabolic worsening compared with the baseline examination. The SPM subgroup analysis found no significant differences based on genetics, whereas it showed a more significant temporoparietal hypometabolism in patients with visual symptoms compared with those without. In nine additional cases identified from eight publications, FDG-PET showed heterogeneous findings, ranging from diffusely decreased cerebral glucose metabolism to unremarkable examinations in two cases.

Conclusions

FDG-PET seems highly sensitive to evaluate LD at any stage and may correlate with disease progression. Areas of decreased glucose metabolism in LD are extensive, often involving multiple cortical and subcortical regions, with thalamus, temporal, frontal, and parietal lobes being the most severely affected. Prospective longitudinal collaborative studies are needed to validate our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nitschke F, Ahonen SJ, Nitschke S, Mitra S, Minassian BA. Lafora disease – from pathogenesis to treatment strategies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:606–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh S, Ganesh S. Lafora progressive myoclonus epilepsy: a meta-analysis of reported mutations in the first decade following the discovery of the EPM2A and NHLRC1 genes. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:715–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Drury I, Blaivas M, Abou-Khalil BW, Beydoun A. Biopsy results in a kindred with Lafora disease. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:102–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Villanueva V, Linera JA, Gòmez-Garre P, Gutiérrez J, Serratosa JM. MRI volumetry and proton MR spectroscopy of the brain in Lafora disease. Epilepsia. 2006;47:788–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Turnbull J, Tiberia E, Striano P, et al. Lafora disease. Epileptic Disord. 2016;18:38–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jennesson M, Milh M, Villeneuve N, et al. Posterior glucose hypometabolism in Lafora disease: early and late FDG-PET assessment. Epilepsia. 2010;51:708–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kato Z, Yasuda K, Ishii K, et al. Glucose metabolism evaluated by positron emission tomography in Lafora disease. Pediatr Int. 1999;41:689–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuda H, Katsumi Y, Nakamura M, et al. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in Lafora disease. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1995;35:175–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al Otaibi SF, Minassian BA, Ackerley CA, Logan WJ, Weiss S. Unusual presentation of Lafora’s disease. J Child Neurol. 2003;18:499–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Casciato S, Gambardella S, Mascia A, et al. Severe and rapidly-progressive Lafora disease associated with NHLRC1 mutation: a case report. Int J Neurosci. 2017;127:1150–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen AL, Jones LK, Parisi JE, Klaas JP. Intractable epilepsy and progressive cognitive decline in a young man. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:737–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Driver-Dunkley E, Sirven J, Drazkowski J, Caviness JN. Lafora disease with primary generalized epileptic myoclonus. Mov Disord. 2005;20:907–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shandal V, Veenstra AL, Behen M, Sundaram S, Chugani H. Long-term outcome in children with intractable epilepsy showing bilateral diffuse cortical glucose hypometabolism pattern on positron emission tomography. J Child Neurol. 2012;27:39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Franceschetti S, Gambardella A, Canafoglia L, et al. Clinical and genetic findings in 26 Italian patients with Lafora disease. Epilepsia. 2006;47:640–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Varrone A, Asenbaum S, Vander Borght T, et al. EANM procedure guidelines for PET brain imaging using [18F]FDG, version 2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:2103–010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Friston KJ, Passingham RE, Nutt JG, Heather JD, Sawle GV, Frackowiak RS. Localisation in PET images: direct fitting of the intercommissural (AC-PC) line. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1989;9(5):690–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Acton PD, Friston KJ. Statistical parametric mapping in functional neuroimaging: beyond PET and fMRI activation studies. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25(7):663–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Heycop Ten Ham MW, De Jager H. Progressive myoclonus epilepsy with Lafora bodies. Clinico-pathological features. Epilepsia 1963;4:95–119.

  19. Schwarz GA, Yanoff M, et al. Lafora’s disease. Distinct clinico-pathologic form of Unverricht’s syndrome. Arch Neurol. 1965;12:172–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Traoré M, Landouré G, Motley W, et al. Novel mutation in the NHLRC1 gene in a Malian family with a severe phenotype of Lafora disease. Neurogenetics. 2009;10:319–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sokoloff L. The deoxyglucose method for the measurement of local glucose utilization and the mapping of local functional activity in the central nervous system. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1981;22:287–333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Selkoe DJ. Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002;298:789–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ganesh S, Delgado-Escueta AV, Sakamoto T. Targeted disruption of the Epm2a gene causes formation of Lafora inclusion bodies, neurodegeneration, ataxia, myoclonus epilepsy and impaired behavioral response in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:1251–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. De Volder AG, Cirelli S, de Barsy T, et al. Neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis: preferential metabolic alterations in thalamus and posterior association cortex demonstrated by PET. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;52:1063–1067.

  25. Sperling MR, Gur RC, Alavi A, et al. Subcortical metabolic alterations in partial epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1990;31:145–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Benedek K, Juhàsz C, Muzik O, et al. Metabolic changes of subcortical structures in intractable focal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2004;45:1100–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Newberg AB, Alavi A, Berlin J, et al. Ipsilateral and contralateral thalamic hypometabolism as a predictor of outcome after temporal lobectomy for seizures. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1964–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Agarwal R, Humar A, Tiwari VN, Chugani H. Thalamic abnormalities in children with continuous spike-wave during slow-wave sleep: an F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography perspective. Epilepsia. 2016;57:263–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim JH, Im KC, Kim JS, Lee SA, Kang JK. Correlation of interictal spike-wave with thalamic glucose metabolism in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Neuroreport. 2005;16:1151–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pichiecchio A, Veggiotti P, Cardinali S, et al. Lafora disease: spectroscopy study correlated with neuropsychological findings. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2008;12:342–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Andrade DM, del Campo JM, Moro E, Minassian BA, Wennberg RA. Nonepileptic visual hallucinations in Lafora disease. Neurology. 2005;64:1311–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Collerton D, Taylor JP. Advances in the treatment of visual hallucinations in neurodegenerative diseases. Future Neurol. 2013;8:433–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Diederich NJ, Fénelon G, Stebbins G, Goetz CG. Hallucinations in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5:331–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sullivan MA, Nitschke S, Steup M, Minassian BA, Nitschke F. Pathogenesis of Lafora disease: transition of soluble glycogen to insoluble polyglucosan. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18.

  35. Chugani HT, Phelps ME, Mazziotta JC. Positron emission tomography study of human brain functional development. Ann Neurol. 1987;22:487–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Bogaert P, Wikler D, Damhaut P, Hb S, Goldman S. Regional changes in glucose metabolism during brain development from the age of 6 years. Neuroimage. 1998;8:62–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Theodore WH. Antiepileptic drugs and cerebral glucose metabolism. Epilepsia. 1988;29(Suppl.2):S48–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Leiderman DB, Balish M, Bromfield EB, Theodore WH. Effect of valproate on human cerebral glucose metabolism. Epilepsia. 1991;32:417–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Sergio Modoni and Dr. Vincenzo Allegri for their help in performing and analyzing FDG-PET data. We would also like to thank the patients and their families for their kind participation in our research activities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Francesca Bisulli, Lorenzo Muccioli, Andrea Farolfi, and Federica Pondrelli contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Lorenzo Muccioli and Andrea Farolfi. Review and editing was performed by Francesca Bisulli, Paolo Tinuper, Andrea Farolfi, Federica Pondrelli, Laura Licchetta, Rachele Bonfiglioli, Simona Civollani, Cinzia Pettinato, Elisa Maietti and Francesco Toni. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Study supervision: Francesca Bisulli, Paolo Tinuper, and Stefano Fanti.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Bisulli.

Ethics declarations

This retrospective analysis was approved by the local ethics committee (reference number: 18076). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal representatives.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muccioli, L., Farolfi, A., Pondrelli, F. et al. FDG-PET assessment and metabolic patterns in Lafora disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 47, 1576–1584 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04647-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04647-3

Keywords

Navigation