Diagnostic performance of choline PET for detection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 880 Downloads
Hyperparathyroidism (HPT) is a common endocrine disorder caused by hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands (HP). The correct detection and localization of HP is challenging but crucial, as it may guide surgical treatment, particularly in patients with primary HPT. There is a growing body of data regarding the role of radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography (PET) in this setting. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of this method in detecting HP in patients with HPT.
This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive computer literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for studies published through May 2018 was performed using the following search algorithm: (a) “choline” or “fluorocholine” or “F-choline” or “C-choline” or “FCH” or “CH” or “FECH” or “FMCH” and (b) “PET” or “positron emission tomography” and (c) “parathyroid” or “hyperparathyroidism”. The diagnostic performance of radiolabelled choline PET was expressed as sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) on a per-patient and per-lesion basis and as detection rate (DR) on a per-patient basis, with pooled proportion and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) obtained using a random-effects model.
Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review. Fourteen articles (517 patients) were selected for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis provided the following results on a per-patient analysis analysis: sensitivity 95% (95% CI: 92–97%), PPV 97% (95% CI: 95–98%) and DR 91% (95% CI: 87–94%). On a per-lesion analysis, pooled sensitivity and PPV were 92% (95% CI: 88–96) and 92% (95% CI: 89–95%), respectively. No significant heterogeneity was found among the selected studies.
Radiolabelled choline PET demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in detecting HP in patients with HPT. Large multicentre studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to better define the role of this imaging method in this setting.
KeywordsPET Positron emission tomography Choline Hyperparathyroidism Parathyroid
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 21.Alharbi AA, Alshehri FM, Albatly AA, Sah BR, Schmid C, Huber GF, et al. [(18)F]Fluorocholine uptake of parathyroid adenoma is correlated with parathyroid hormone level. Mol Imaging Biol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-018-1179-x.
- 22.Grimaldi S, Young J, Kamenicky P, Hartl D, Terroir M, Leboulleux S, et al. Challenging pre-surgical localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism: the added value of (18)F-Fluorocholine PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4018-z.
- 23.Beheshti M, Hehenwarter L, Paymani Z, Rendl G, Imamovic L, Rettenbacher R, et al. (18)F-Fluorocholine PET/CT in the assessment of primary hyperparathyroidism compared with (99m)Tc-MIBI or (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT: a prospective dual-centre study in 100 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3980-9.
- 24.Fischli S, Suter-Widmer I, Nguyen BT, Müller W, Metzger J, Strobel K, et al. The significance of 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT as localizing imaging technique in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and negative conventional imaging. Front Endocrinol. 2018;8:380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Taywade SK, Damle NA, Behera A, Devasenathipathy K, Bal C, Tripathi M, et al. Comparison of 18F-Fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography in the preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas-initial results. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017;21(3):399–403.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Thanseer N, Bhadada SK, Sood A, Mittal BR, Behera A, Gorla AKR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonography, 99mTc-Sestamibi, and 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT in detecting parathyroid adenomas in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(12):e491–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Kluijfhout WP, Vorselaars WM, van den Berk SA, Vriens MR, Borel Rinkes IH, Valk GD, et al. Fluorine-18 fluorocholine PET-CT localizes hyperparathyroidism in patients with inconclusive conventional imaging: a multicenter study from the Netherlands. Nucl Med Commun. 2016;37(12):1246–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Kluijfhout WP, Vorselaars WM, Vriens MR, Borel Rinkes IH, Valk GD, de Keizer B. Enabling minimal invasive parathyroidectomy for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism using Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT-CT, ultrasound and first results of (18)F-fluorocholine PET-CT. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(9):1745–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Michaud L, Balogova S, Burgess A, Ohnona J, Huchet V, Kerrou K, et al. A pilot comparison of 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, ultrasonography and 123I/99mTc-sestaMIBI dual-phase dual-isotope scintigraphy in the preoperative localization of Hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism: influence of thyroid anomalies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(41):e1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Michaud L, Burgess A, Huchet V, Lefèvre M, Tassart M, Ohnona J, et al. Is 18F-fluorocholine-positron emission tomography/computerized tomography a new imaging tool for detecting hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(12):4531–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Treglia G, Sadeghi R, Schalin-Jäntti C, Caldarella C, Ceriani L, Giovanella L, et al. Detection rate of (99m) Tc-MIBI single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in preoperative planning for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: a meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2016;38(Suppl 1):E2159–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar