Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Amyloid load but not regional glucose metabolism predicts conversion to Alzheimer’s dementia in a memory clinic population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The value of imaging regional glucose metabolism with [18F]FDG PET for the prediction of progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) is controversial. The predictive value of imaging with [18F]FDG PET was therefore tested and compared with that of imaging beta-amyloid load with [11C]PIB PET in the same memory clinic population of MCI patients.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with MCI who had undergone [18F]FDG as well as [11C]PIB PET were identified from a single-centre clinical registry. [18F]FDG and [11C]PIB PET images were rated as positive or negative for the presence of regional hypometabolism typical of AD and beta-amyloid deposition, respectively. Raters were blinded to the clinical information. Patients were followed clinically for 2.7 ± 1.2 years after PET. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age and sex, were used to test the predictive value of [18F]FDG PET, [11C]PIB PET, and both in combination.

Results

[18F]FDG PET did not significantly predict conversion to AD (p > 0.1). By contrast, models including [11C]PIB PET only (p < 0.05) or both [18F]FDG and [11C]PIB PET (p < 0.05) significantly predicted conversion to AD. The hazard ratio for AD in patients with a positive [11C]PIB scan was 10.2 (95% confidence interval 1.3–78.1). The results were confirmed by analysis of semiquantitative measures using normalized [18F]FDG uptake and [11C]PIB standardized uptake value ratios in AD-typical regions as continuous predictors.

Conclusion

In contrast to [11C]PIB PET, [18F]FDG PET did not predict conversion from MCI to AD in this clinical patient sample. Therefore, amyloid PET should be preferred for individual prediction and patient counselling in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2016;22:404–18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vos SJ, Verhey F, Frolich L, Kornhuber J, Wiltfang J, Maier W, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease at the mild cognitive impairment stage. Brain. 2015;138:1327–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Weiner MW, Aisen PS, et al. Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer's disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:207–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schreiber S, Landau SM, Fero A, Schreiber F, Jagust WJ. Comparison of visual and quantitative florbetapir F 18 positron emission tomography analysis in predicting mild cognitive impairment outcomes. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:1183–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grimmer T, Wutz C, Alexopoulos P, Drzezga A, Forster S, Forstl H, et al. Visual versus fully automated analyses of 18F-FDG and amyloid PET for prediction of dementia due to Alzheimer disease in mild cognitive impairment. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:204–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmand B, Eikelenboom P, van Gool WA. Value of diagnostic tests to predict conversion to Alzheimer's disease in young and old patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;29:641–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smailagic N, Vacante M, Hyde C, Martin S, Ukoumunne O, Sachpekidis C. 18F-FDG PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD010632.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morbelli S, Garibotto V, Van De Giessen E, Arbizu J, Chetelat G, Drezgza A, et al. A Cochrane review on brain [18F]FDG PET in dementia: limitations and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1487–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prestia A, Caroli A, Wade SK, van der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele R, Van Berckel B, et al. Prediction of AD dementia by biomarkers following the NIA-AA and IWG diagnostic criteria in MCI patients from three European memory clinics. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11:1191–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:270–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Frings L, Hellwig S, Spehl TS, Bormann T, Buchert R, Vach W, et al. Asymmetries of amyloid-beta burden and neuronal dysfunction are positively correlated in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2015;138:3089–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Minoshima S, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer's disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trzepacz PT, Yu P, Sun J, Schuh K, Case M, Witte MM, et al. Comparison of neuroimaging modalities for the prediction of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35:143–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morbelli S, Brugnolo A, Bossert I, Buschiazzo A, Frisoni GB, Galluzzi S, et al. Visual versus semi-quantitative analysis of 18F-FDG-PET in amnestic MCI: an European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) project. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44:815–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abner EL, Kryscio RJ, Schmitt FA, Fardo DW, Moga DC, Ighodaro ET, et al. Outcomes after diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment in a large autopsy series. Ann Neurol. 2017;81:549–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Frings.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frings, L., Hellwig, S., Bormann, T. et al. Amyloid load but not regional glucose metabolism predicts conversion to Alzheimer’s dementia in a memory clinic population. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45, 1442–1448 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3983-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3983-6

Keywords

Navigation