Skip to main content

Highlights lecture EANM 2016: “Embracing molecular imaging and multi-modal imaging: a smart move for nuclear medicine towards personalized medicine”


The 2016 EANM Congress took place in Barcelona, Spain, from 15 to 19 October under the leadership of Prof. Wim Oyen, chair of the EANM Scientific Committee. With more than 6,000 participants, this congress was the most important European event in nuclear medicine, bringing together a multidisciplinary community involved in the different fields of nuclear medicine. There were over 600 oral and 1,200 poster or e-Poster presentations with an overwhelming focus on development and application of imaging for personalized care, which is timely for the community. Beyond FDG PET, major highlights included progress in the use of PSMA and SSTR receptor-targeted radiopharmaceuticals and associated theranostics in oncology. Innovations in radiopharmaceuticals for imaging pathologies of the brain and cardiovascular system, as well as infection and inflammation, were also highlighted. In the areas of physics and instrumentation, multimodality imaging and radiomics were highlighted as promising areas of research.


The choice of title for the 2016 EANM highlights lecture resonates with the steady rise in new imaging methods for personalized medicine. As seen at the conference, the breadth of imaging methods being developed and/or applied to personalize therapy is remarkable, ranging from molecular characterization to direct treatment pathways and choice of theranostics, to the promise of radiomics and other biomathematical approaches for predicting therapy response and patient outcome. As a community, we are paralleling the explosion in different facets of medicine including immunotherapy and radionuclide therapy through implementation of multimodal molecular imaging diagnostic approaches that will not only make better use of these powerful therapies but also, in the future, help us to better judge therapy resistance and how to manage it. The scientific reports submitted to this congress – 2,266 in total – highlight the ability to design new vectors to navigate the body’s defences and home in on specific pathologies including cancer, dementia, cardiovascular disease, infection and more. These reports show that our community is changing how medicine is practised and will be practised in the future in terms of who should get what therapy, whose therapy ought to be changed, and how best to deliver therapy.

The era of personalized or stratified medicine began a few years ago, especially in oncology but also in neurology and cardiology. Over the past few years, nuclear medicine has undergone impressive growth, with the development of PET, especially using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), but also innovative radiopharmaceuticals. These developments are ripe for personalized medicine including ‘smart’ diagnostic tools with high sensitivity and specificity, baseline prognostic imaging or therapy evaluation tools, and predictive imaging (theranostics and companion diagnostics) approaches using novel radiopharmaceuticals targeting relevant biomarkers to allow selection of patients for conventional and radionuclide-targeted therapies.

The scientific programme of the EANM congress in Barcelona illustrates the considerable growth of nuclear medicine with 1,892 scientific communications in the field of oncology (31%), the molecules to man (M2M) pathway including translational molecular Imaging, radiopharmacy, radiochemistry and drug development (21%), radionuclide therapy and dosimetry (12%), physics, instrumentation and data analysis (10%), cardiology (7%) and neuroscience (7%). In oncology, prostate cancer, neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), breast cancer, brain tumours and haematological diseases were the tumours of most interest for nuclear medicine development. From more than 200 excellent presentations received for highlights, only 50 were finally included in the lecture, because of the limited time available and redundancy between presentations. However, we congratulate all authors who provided slides for their excellent contributions.

Discovery science

We received a large number of abstracts dealing with innovative radiopharmaceuticals with new delivery systems and radionuclides. The number of cell-surface biomarker imaging probes continues to increase. Based on the negative prognostic role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [1, 2], Burley et al. from London, UK, developed a PET tracer for imaging EGFR by conjugating the long-lived isotope 89Zr to an Affibody specific for EGFR via the chelator deferoxamine (89Zr-DFO-AffiEGFR:03115) [3]. PET/CT with this tracer showed EGFR-specific and sensitive tumour localization in xenografted mice. Tumour heterogeneity was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry and autoradiography. In addition to EGFR, another target set linked to major drug development programmes is the immune checkpoint PD-1 expressed on T cells, and its ligand PD-L1, expressed on tumour and antigen-presenting cells [4]. Heskamp et al. from Nijmegen, The Netherlands, radiolabelled both anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies with 111In to image PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, respectively, in syngeneic murine tumour models [5]. In tumour, spleen, duodenum, brown fat, lymph nodes and thymus, 111In-anti-PD-1 and 111In-anti-PD-L1 uptake, detected by SPECT/CT 3 days after injection, was associated with expression of the respective organ proteins by immunohistochemistry, supporting the role of these radiolabelled antibodies in pretreatment imaging and therapy monitoring (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Imaging with anti-PD-L1 antibodies shows uptake in the tumour, spleen, duodenum, brown fat, and lymph nodes. b Imaging with anti-PD-1 antibodies shows uptake in the tumour, lymph nodes and thymus. B Brown fat, D Duodenum, L Lymph nodes. S Spleen, T Tumour, Th Thymus

The CXCR4 and CAIX targets were also highlighted. Research on the chemokine receptor CXCR4 continues to gain momentum. Miranda et al. from Hull, UK, reported a new specific and stable configurationally restricted tetraazamacrocyclic CXCR4 antagonist, 64Cu-CB-bicyclam, suitable for PET imaging of CXCR4 with high affinity [6]. They demonstrated that tumour uptake was dependent on CXCR4 expression, and further showed self-blocking with cold tracer in liver but not with AMD3100 or AMD3465 – presumably due to higher affinity and residence time of the tracer. There were also reports of the first clinical tracer in this field, 68Ga-pentixafor [7]. Leisser et al. from Vienna, Austria, reported high contrast PET/MRI with this tracer in patients with the indolent MALT lymphoma, even when the lesion was undetectable by MRI [8] (Fig. 2). The clinical development of antibody vectors for CAIX was also highlighted. Hekman et al. from Nijmegen, reported the first-in-man study of the anti-CAIX antibody, girentuximab, labelled with 89Zr, in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [9]. Their study exemplifies how this PET/CT strategy could have a role in detecting or excluding primary and metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the observed association between PET and histology means that in a situation where MRI was not able to differentiate between blood thrombus and vital tumour thrombus, PET/CT showed high uptake of 89Zr-girentuximab in the mass, and thrombectomy confirmed vital ccRCC. Lastly, Iagaru et al. from Stanford, USA, presented work on 68Ga-RM2 PET/MRI measuring gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, and demonstrated its potential utility in the specific detection of biochemically recurrent prostate, an area that has seen several new tracers recently approved for human use, with PET detecting more lesions than MRI [10].

Fig. 2
figure 2

68Ga-Pentixafor PET in MALT lymphoma. A 75-year-old woman with biopsy-proven MALT lymphoma of the pararenal region. The known large MALT lymphoma shows high 68Ga-pentixafor uptake (SUVmax 25.4) and restricted diffusion on the diffusion-weighted images with b value 800 (red arrows). In addition an area of increased uptake on the PET images with restricted diffusion on the ADC map (yellow arrows) is evident, which proved to be MALT lymphoma of the orbit

Fig. 3
figure 3

89Zr-Girentuximab PET imaging. Top left: A 76-year-old patient presenting with a Bosniak category 3 renal cyst in a solitary kidney and decreased renal function. 89Zr-Girentuximab PET/CT imaging indicated that it was a ccRCC, which was confirmed after partial nephrectomy. Top right: Patient presenting with bilateral growing renal masses. No uptake is seen in any of the lesions. Three biopsies confirmed that the masses were oncocytomas. Bottom left: Patient with a history of ccRCC who developed a large liver lesion and multiple pulmonary metastases. The 89Zr-girentuximab PET/CT image shows uptake in all lesions confirming metastatic ccRCC. Bottom right: Patient presenting with a 1-cm mass in the inferior caval vein 6 months after nephrectomy for ccRCC. The 89Zr-girentuximab PET/CT image shows high uptake in the mass and thrombectomy confirmed vital ccRCC

The overarching direction of travel in oncology discovery science appears to be design and validation of highly specific probes, with the potential to transform our understanding of cell surface and extracellular matrix molecular pathology and to provide opportunities for detecting and treating disease. While the majority of radiopharmaceutical discovery science was in oncology there were also reports of innovative probes in neuroscience, cardiovascular disease, infection/inflammation and other fields. Three new brain targets for PET imaging were highlighted including β-secretase (a key enzyme in β-amyloid deposition) [11], the cyclic adenosine monophosphate regulator phosphodiesterase 4 [12], and α-synuclein [13]. Takano et al. from Stockholm, Sweden, reported the radiolabelling and initial evaluation of a novel β-secretase-selective PET radioligand, 18F-PF-06684511, with favourable binding kinetics in the brain of nonhuman primates [14]. The authors proposed that the probe could be a valuable PET imaging translational tool for elucidating the disease mechanism of Alzheimer’s disease and for facilitating clinical development of β-secretase inhibitors as a potential treatment for Alzheimer’s disease.

The development of 18F-PF-06445974, a novel PDE4D-sparing PDE4 PET radioligand was reported by Chen et al. from Cambridge, USA [15]. The tracer demonstrated favourable brain binding kinetics in nonhuman primates with high tissue distribution and up to 94% blockade of ligand occupancy. This study precedes the development of new inhibitors for treating diseases such as psychosis without the side effect of emesis. From a library of compounds with selectivity (>120-fold) to α-synuclein relative to Aβ and tau, Yousefi et al. from Munich identified a high-affinity tracer, 18F-DABTA-11, for visualization of α-synucleinopathies by PET [16]. 18F-DABTA-11 PET/MRI imaging of NTac:SD-Tg(SNCA*E46K) genetically modified mice confirmed regional uptake of the tracer, as verified by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 4). The tracer holds promise for the early diagnosis of α-synucleinopathies including Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies.

Fig. 4
figure 4

[18F]DABTA-11 PET images in E46K rats show accumulation of the tracer in the medulla oblongata. The accumulation is apparent even at 2 months of age and is more prominent at 6 and 12 months of age with detectable uptake in the substantia nigra. PET/MRI and rat brain atlas confirm the regional uptake of tracer

Two tracers in cardiovascular disease targeting fatty acid metabolism and mannose receptor expression were also highlighted. Strauss et al. from New York, USA, reported a phase II study of a novel fatty acid analogue, 18F-FCPHA, for PET imaging of cardiac metabolism [17]. There were no serious adverse events and seven adverse events. High diagnostic-quality images of the heart were obtained at rest and stress (exercise or dipyridamole) 30 min after tracer injection. Varasteh et al. from Munich described the use of 111In-tilmanocept for imaging the mannose receptor by SPECT/CT [18]. The authors demonstrated specific imaging of the mannose receptor in ApoE-KO mice. Histology showed the presence of mannose receptor-positive M3/84 (Mac3 macrophages surface antigen) and fibrous/fibroatheromatous plaques in parts of the aorta, and these were detected macroscopically by SPECT/CT and by ex vivo imaging. Molecular imaging in non-oncology areas is clearly expanding and in some cases ahead of drug development programmes, and thus promises to be highly valuable in the clinical implementation of the drugs in such programmes.

New targetry, synthetic routes and automation permit improved and safe production of radiopharmaceuticals. In spite of the value of instrumentation, we were prevented by the constraint of time from elaborating the various presentations at this conference. One area worth highlighting involves developments around scandium radioisotopes [19, 20]. Bilewicz et al. from Warsaw presented work on cyclotron production of the theranostic pair 43Sc (β+ emitter for PET; t 1/2 3.89 h) and 47Sc (β emitter for radionuclide therapy) [21]. They were able to produce 43Sc in 42Ca(d,n)43Sc with no radionuclide impurities, and 47Sc in 48Ca(p,2n)47Sc nuclear reactions with low radionuclide impurity profile (<10% 48Sc). The scandium radionuclide pair could be a cyclotron alternative to 68Ga in theranostic applications. Other applications for PET imaging were reported at the conference.

PET/MRI: useful for science but what about clinical practice?

PET/MRI represents a significant advance in multimodality molecular imaging [22] and more abstracts were received for the 2016 congress than for previous congresses, with 16 presentations considered for the Highlights lecture, in particular studies addressing the impact of PET/MRI in clinical practice. As expected, brain tumour evaluation is an important issue for this multimodality imaging. Grech-Sollars et al. from Imperial College London presented a prospective pilot study which did not use a PET/MRI system but addressed a relevant question for PET/MRI [23]. Choline is a biomarker of interest in glioma that is related to cell membrane turnover and tumour aggressiveness, and previous choline PET studies have shown differential uptake between benign and malignant tumours. Thus, the relationship between choline metabolism detected in vivo using MR spectroscopy (MRS) and PET, and tissue markers of choline synthesis and glioma proliferation were investigated in 14 patients with suspected primary glioma undergoing multimodal 3-T MRI (including multivoxel MRS) and dynamic 45-min list-mode 18F-fluoromethylcholine (18F-FMC) PET/CT. The ratio of the tumour SUVmax to the contralateral white matter SUVmean (tumour to background ratio, TBR) was determined. All tumours showed increased tracer uptake with spatial concordance between PET and MRS. Higher TBR values were observed in WHO grade IV tumours than in WHO grades I–III tumours on 18F-FMC PET/CT (mean 25.5 versus 8.2; p < 0.05) and higher Cho/Cr ratios were observed in WHO grades III/IV tumours than in grade I/II tumours on MRS (p < 0.05), suggesting the relevance of multimodal imaging for glioma grading.

We know that the attenuation correction (AC) method in PET/MRI is debatable, and Ladefoged et al. from the University of Copenhagen reported the new AC method RESOLUTE [24] in 68 fluoroethyltyrosine (18F-FET) PET/MRI examinations [25]. The use of RESOLUTE enabled measurement patient-specific bone density. Using RESOLUTE, improved PET recovery (−2%) was obtained over vendor-provided UTE (−7%) and Dixon (−15%) methods. The Tmax/B ratio is a metric used to distinguish tumour tissue from reactive tissue, and the improved PET accuracy resulted in Tmax/B ratios very close to those obtained with CT-AC. The improvement in accuracy obviously also affected tumour delineation, resulting in tumour volumes that were very close to the volumes found using CT-AC.

We also received two interesting presentations reporting clinical data using dual tracers for PET/MRI in prostate and breast cancers. Sonni et al. from Stanford University reported the results of a prospective study assessing the combined use of 18F-NaF/18F-FDG and TOF simultaneous PET/MRI imaging in 11 women with breast cancer and 26 men with prostate cancer, in comparison with 99mTc-MDP [26]. 18F-NaF (0.7–2.2 mCi, mean 1.1 mCi) and 18F-FDG (3.6–5.5 mCi, mean 4.1 mCi) were subsequently injected from separate syringes. The whole-body MRI protocol consisted of T2-weighted, DWI, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. It is perhaps not surprising that 18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/MRI was superior to 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy, with higher lesion detection performance, even in bone (Fig. 5). The dual tracer PET/MRI procedure appears interesting, with good PET image quality despite a marked reduction in the administered activities of radiopharmaceuticals (80% less for 18F-NaF and 67% less for 18F-FDG compared with standard protocols) allowing a significant reduction in radiation exposure. Moreover, Hartenbach et al. from the Medical University of Vienna reported the clinical impact and staging performance of hybrid multiparametric 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC/18F-fluorocholine PET/MRI (dtPET/MRI) in 87 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer scheduled for radical prostatectomy included in a prospective clinical trial (NCT02659527) [27]. As compared to MSKCC prediction nomogram, dtPET/MRI using a dynamic protocol provided additional highly accurate information on TNM staging, leading to a treatment change in 26 of 87 patients (30%) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

18F-NaF/18F-FDG PET/MRI in breast and prostate cancer. PET/MRI image quality was diagnostic despite the marked reduction in the administered activities. PET/MRI was superior to 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy for evaluation of skeletal disease extent and detected extraskeletal disease

Fig. 6
figure 6

68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC/18F-fluorocholine PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a locoregional lymph nodes; b paraaortic lymph node; c bone metastasis

PET/MRI is not only useful in oncology. Abgral et al. from the University Hospital of Brest, in collaboration with teams at the University of Edinburgh and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, investigated the role of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the detection of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), which is a diagnostic challenge [28]. 18F-FDG is a marker of inflammatory disease, and MRI with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) reveals the pattern of myocardial injury. In this study, PET data were reconstructed using a Dixon MRI AC map. Of 25 patients prospectively enrolled, 8 were considered CS-positive and 17 CS-negative by a consensus of clinical experts. Interestingly, while there was no statistically significant difference in terms of SUVmax (p = 0.266), T2 mapping value (p = 0.320), target-to-blood pool ratios (TBRmax, p = 0.239; TBRmean, p = 0.248) between CS-positive and CS-negative patients, the mean maximum target-to-negative myocardium LGE ratios (TNRmax) were 1.68 ± 0.41 and 1.09 ± 0.08 in CS-positive and CS-negative patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). Moreover, two patients with previously unknown sarcoid involvement (bone, liver) were identified and PET/MRI identified an alternative cause for cardiac symptoms in six CS-negative patients (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

18F-FDG PET/MRI images in patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. ARVC Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, LGE Late gadolinium enhancement, LV Left ventricle

PSMA and somatostatin receptor imaging and therapy: high throughput developments

PSMA targeting using radiolabelled ligands was a major topic at the EANM 2016 congress with around 50 communications initially considered for Highlights. These compounds based on lysine-glutamate-urea derivatives, first developed as inhibitors of the enzymatic activity of PSMA, have been labelled by a variety of radionuclides for PET imaging and radionuclide therapy for theranostic approaches in prostate cancer patients. A variety of closely related compounds are under investigation [29]. Retrospective studies have suggested a high sensitivity of PET using 68Ga-PSMA ligands in early restaging of prostate cancer but, as with other PET tracers, their value in primary tumour staging is yet to be determined, especially in patients with high-risk disease [30, 31]. Moreover, large prospective studies are required to confirm their imaging performance and clinical impact. Other PET emitters with longer half-lives such as 64Cu could also be interesting in allowing delayed imaging and quantification, and also centralized production. For therapeutic applications, despite toxicities that need to be better controlled, PSMA radioligand therapy (PRLT) is an original systemic approach to the treatment in patients with relapsing metastatic disease, and promising efficacy has been reported with 177Lu [32, 33], as well as with alpha-emitters [34], with preclinical studies suggesting a potentially high kidney dose with alpha-emitters [35].

In this congress, the preliminary results of two prospective clinical trials assessing 68Ga-PSMA ligands in the context of biochemical failure after radical treatment were reported: in patients with PSA values <2 ng/mL by a team in Bologna and in patients with PSA values <1 ng/ml by a team at Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark. In a single-centre study in patients with PSA values <2 ng/mL, Ceci et al. found a positivity rate of 62% in the first 50 of 100 consecutive patients, with local disease in the prostate bed or pelvic lymph nodes in 15 patients (30%), distant disease in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes or bone in 10 patients (20%), and local and distant disease in 5 patients (10%) [36]. Interestingly, the detection rate was associated with PSA concentration, doubling time (DT) and velocity. In 26 patients with PSA values <1 ng/ml, Nielsen et al. found a detection rate of only 23% (six PET-positive patients), with a mean PSA level of 0.6 ng/ml and a DT of 7 months in PET-positive patients, and a mean PSA level of 0.3 ng/ml and a DT of 18 months in PET-negative patients [37]. These two studies confirm that PSA DT is an important consideration when selecting patients for 68Ga-PSMA PET, in particular in patients with low PSA levels (<1 ng/ml).

The use of 68Ga-PSMA for primary staging was retrospectively assessed by Uprimny et al. from Innsbruck in 82 patients [38]. PSMA PET was positive in the primary tumour in 93% of patients, with bone foci in ten patients (12%). Patients with a Gleason score of 6 or 7 showed a lower median SUVmax than patients with a Gleason score of >7 and patients with a PSA level <10.0 ng/ml a lower median SUVmax than those with PSA level >10.0 ng/ml, suggesting the value of 68Ga-PSMA PET in initial staging in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. A team in Linz confirmed the role of 68Ga-PSMA PET in high-risk disease in a series of 61 patients with intermediate-risk (5 patients) and high-risk tumours (56 patients) [39]. At least one malignant lesion was detected in the prostate gland of all patients, and lymph node and bone metastases were detected in 18 and 12 patients, respectively, all with high-risk tumour.

Labelling of PSMA ligands with positron-emitting radioisotopes which have longer half-lives than 68Ga could be interesting, and Gangemi et al. from Catanzaro, Italy, reported their preliminary experience using 64Cu-PSMA PET/CT in 13 patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer before prostatectomy [40]. The administered activity ranged between 259 and 370 MBq and the acquisitions included a static scan of the pelvis at the time of injection and a whole-body scan after 1 and 4 h with 5 min per bed position. 64Cu-PSMA PET detected a focal hot spot in the prostate in all patients with SUVmax ranging from 4 to 14. The SUVmax of primary prostatic lesions progressively increased from early to delayed images (30%) with an optimal TBR at 4 h. Lymph node uptake was also detected in three patients, and was confirmed as tumour by histology. A high liver uptake was observed, with SUVmax ranging from 19.5 to 40.5 (Fig. 8). The authors concluded that 64Cu-PSMA may be an alternative to 68Ga-PSMA because of the high quality of delayed images, and its low urinary excretion and good physical properties.

Fig. 8
figure 8

64Cu-PSMA PET images in a patient with prostate cancer. An optimal tumour-background ratio was observed at 4 h (a). Lymph node uptake was detected in three patients, and was confirmed as tumour by histology (b)

Radionuclide therapy with PSMA ligands is also a promising approach, and interesting results of PRLT with 177Lu were presented at this congress. Ferdinandus et al. assessed predictors of responses to PRLT in 40 patients with distant metastases and progressive disease with hormone refractory and/or chemorefractory disease [41]. 68Ga-PSMA PET was recorded 1–2 weeks prior to administration of a mean activity of 6 GBq. A proportion of patients (67.5%) showed a reduction in PSA level 2 months after therapy, with 35% showing a reduction of more than 50%. In a univariate analysis, older age, a lower Gleason score, a lower number of platelets, a lower C-reactive protein level, no need for pain medication and a lower lactate dehydrogenase level reflected a positive impact on response, whereas the response was independent of tumour uptake on 68Ga-PSMA PET or previous therapies. Interestingly, Khurshid et al., in a second retrospective analysis in 36 patients, showed the predictive value of textural parameters determined on pretherapeutic 68Ga-PSMA PET, demonstrating that the heterogeneity parameters, entropy (p = 0.046) and homogeneity (p = 0.034), were significantly correlated with PSA response, whereas conventional PET parameters did not predict response [42]. Despite the fact that these data have to be confirmed in larger prospective trials with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as endpoints, textural analysis on pretherapy PET may help in risk stratification in the context of personalized therapy.

Another interesting question concerns the responses of tumours at different sites to PRLT. Kulkarni et al. from Bad Berka, Germany, assessed the responses of bone and lymph node lesions by 68Ga-PSMA PET in 120 patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing PRLT with 177Lu labelled PSMA inhibitor [43]. The responses of 61 bone and 73 lymph node metastases, also measurable on CT, were analysed after at least two cycles of PRLT using molecular (EORTC) and morphological (RECIST) imaging criteria. PET responses were observed in 53% of bone lesions and 66% of lymph node lesions, the difference in response rates perhaps being due to differences in absorbed dose and radiosensitivity between the tumour sites. Interestingly, CT detected decreases in size in only 6.6% of bone lesions and 39.7% of lymph node lesions, suggesting that 68Ga-PSMA PET detected response earlier than morphological imaging. These results need to be confirmed in larger prospective studies.

One of the most important issues regarding PRLT is its potential toxicity that presents, as with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in NETs, in the form of renal toxicity. The irradiation of the salivary and lacrimal glands during PRLT may also result in xerostomia, a major cause of discomfort for patients [32, 34]. Preloading has been considered to saturate nontumour sites of PSMA uptake. Kletting et al. from Ulm, Germany, reported the results of simulations aiming to determine the effect of cold PSMA-specific peptide administered prior to PRLT on the time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) of critical organs and tumour, and thus on the therapeutic index [44]. They showed that the administration of high-affinity (K d ≤ 0.1 nM) PSMA-specific peptides 5–30 min before therapy had a substantial effect on the therapeutic index. The optimal preload depended on the affinity of the ligand used. For K d = 0.1 nM the model predicted an optimal preload of 128 nmol that would improving the tumour-to-kidney, tumour-to-lacrimal gland and tumour-to-salivary gland TIAC ratios 1.6-fold. These results have to be confirmed by biodistribution studies.

Somatostatin receptor targeting for PRRT and PET was also an important topic at this congress, with the updated results of the NETTER-1 study and also interesting results with innovative therapeutic strategies and dosimetry protocols. NETTER-1 is a major study for the nuclear medicine community because it is the first phase III multicentre, randomized, controlled trial evaluating PRRT [45]. These updated results comparing 177Lu-DOTA0-Tyr3-octreotate (Lutathera®; four injections of 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks) with octreotide LAR (60 mg every 4 weeks) in 230 patients with inoperable, progressive, somatostatin receptor-positive grade 1/2 metastatic midgut NETs confirm that PRRT improves PFS, with a median PFS not reached with Lutathera® versus a PFS of 8.4 months with the octreotide control treatment (p < 0.0001, HR 0.21). The numbers of patients with a complete or partial response were 18% in the Lutathera group and 3% in the control group (p = 0.0008; n = 201). Interim analysis also suggested an improvement in OS (14 deaths in the Lutathera group, and 26 in the control group; p = 0.0043). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia occurred in 1%, 2% and 9% of patients in the Lutathera group but in none of the patients in the control group.

Other approaches to PRRT were also considered. McEwan et al. reported their experience in 138 patients with advanced gastrointestinal and pancreatic NETs (GEPNETs) using a novel 177Lu-DOTATATE protocol including an induction regimen (four cycles of up to 6.11 GBq per cycle every 10–14 weeks) followed by a maintenance regimen (up to eight cycles of up to 4.07 GBq per cycle every 5.5–10 months) [46]. The median PFS had not been reached at 59.3 months. Transient grade 3 renal and haematological toxicity were reported, but no grade 4 toxicity.

Somatostatin-based PPRT has been in development for some time, so that long-term outcome data have become available. Kunikowska et al. from Poland presented data on the long-term side effects (10-year experience) of tandem peptide radionuclide therapy with 90Y/177Lu-DOTATATE [47]. In 59 patients with disseminated NET (grade 1 and grade 2, Ki-67 <20%), long-term follow-up revealed a high disease control rate and long PFS with a small number of side effects (no grade 4 and 2% grade 3 renal toxicity; 2% myelodysplastic syndrome but no other grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity). A cautionary note from Filice et al. from Milan is that baseline 68Ga-DOTA-peptide SUVmax is a poor surrogate for the long-term absorbed dose, suggesting the need for routine dosimetry evaluation to achieve a more personalized PRRT [48]. While 68Ga-DOTA-peptides remain centre-stage in the staging of patients with NETs, two new imaging methods that could play a role in future staging of this disease were reported. The first was reported by Nicolas et al. from Basel who performed a phase 1/2 trial comparing the SSTR2 antagonist 68Ga-OPS202 with the agonist 68Ga-DOTATOC for somatostatin receptor PET/CT in patients with gastroenteropancreatic NET [49]. Compared with 68Ga-DOTATOC, 68Ga-OPS202 showed higher sensitivity (88–94% versus 59% on a lesional basis) and image contrast (4.3–5.3 versus 1.9; Fig. 9). The second method was reported by Dubash et al. from London who presented an interim review of a phase 1/2 trial of a novel fluorinated octreotate analogue (18F-fluoroethyl triazole-labelled [Tyr3]octreotate) synthesized using ‘click radiochemistry’ in comparison with 68Ga-DOTATATE, which showed good sensitivity and contrast for the imaging of NETs [50]. The new tracer can be transported to multiple clinical sites in a similar manner to FDG. The investigators found noninferior interim sensitivity and contrast for the new tracer compared with 68Ga-DOTATATE (Fig. 10).

Fig. 9
figure 9

SSTR2 antagonist 68Ga-OPS202 for somatostatin receptor PET/CT in gastroenteropancreatic NET. 68Ga-OPS202 shows higher sensitivity and image contrast (b) than the 68Ga-DOTATOC (a)

Fig. 10
figure 10

18F-Fluoroethyl triazole-labelled [Tyr3]octreotate. The authors found non-inferior interim sensitivity and contrast for the new tracer compared with 68Ga-DOTATATE

FDG and radiomics

More than 50 high-level communications were presented showing the prognostic impact of FDG in oncohaematology, especially using metabolic tumour volume (MTV) or textural indices (TI), indicating that nuclear medicine is on its way to utilizing radiomics for stratified medicine. FDG PET is recommended for therapy evaluation in lymphoma, especially in diffuse large B cell lymphoma and Hodgkin disease, using visual analysis based on the Deauville criteria [51]. Kanoun et al. from Dijon, France, reported the prognostic value of total MTV (TMTV) in 392 patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma enrolled in a phase III randomized trial (AHL2011 trial NCT01358747) testing a treatment strategy driven by PET after two courses of treatment (PET2) [52]. The PET2 scans were centrally reviewed and interpreted according to the Deauville criteria, and TMTV was computed on the PET0 scans using the SUVmax threshold of 41%. Using a 350-ml TMTV cut off, with a median follow-up of 16 months, PFS at 2 years was 81% in patients with a high TMTV and 93% in patients with a low TMTV (p = 0.0015; HR = 3). Patients positive on PET2 also showed a lower PFS at 2 years than patients negative on PET2 (76% vs. 92%; p < 0.0001), and the combination of TMTV and PET2 allowed the identification of three groups of patients with significantly different outcomes, indicating that this approach may help clinicians better tailor therapy (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Prognostic value of TMTV in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma enrolled in the AHL2011 trial. The combination of TMTV at baseline and PET positivity after two courses of therapy (PET2/TEP2) allows identification of three groups of patients with significantly different outcomes

The role and prognostic value of FDG PET in mantle-cell lymphoma is less well defined [51]. Bailly et al. from Nantes, France, assessed the prognostic value of quantitative indices derived from 18F-FDG PET in 94 patients with untreated mantle-cell lymphoma included in an ancillary study of the prospective phase III LyMa trial (NCT00921414) [53]. The studied population did not differ from the entire LyMa cohort (n = 299). At diagnosis, univariate analysis showed the prognostic value of SUVmax (p < 0.001), SUVmean (p < 0.001), SUVpeak (p < 0.001) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG; p = 0.03). The prognostic value of SUVmax was reinforced when combined with the mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (MIPI), enabling the definition of three prognostic groups (Fig. 12). Neither whole-body MTV nor whole-body TLG was associated with PFS.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Prognostic value of quantitative indices derived from FDG PET in patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma included in the LyMa trial. At diagnosis, the prognostic value of SUVmax was reinforced when combined with MIPI, enabling the definition of three prognostic groups

The potential utility of quantitative indices derived from 18F-FDG PET in breast cancer was also reported by several teams. A group from Madrid retrospectively evaluated the ability of MTV and TLG in comparison with SUVmax and SUVmean in the initial staging of 100 patients with locally advanced breast cancer to predict the recurrence risk and OS [54]. The only parameter related to recurrence was MTV in the primary tumour (p = 0.048; Fig. 13). There was also a significant association between MTV measured in the primary tumour and all lesions and OS (31.3 cm3 vs. 7.1 cm3, p = 0.003; and 36.2 cm3 vs. 8.7 cm3, p = 0.006, respectively). Likewise, TLG in the primary tumour and all lesions was higher in patients who died (126.9 g vs. 25.5 g, p = 0.007; and 164.6 g vs. 33.8 g, p = 0.009). Neither SUVmax nor SUVmean were of prognostic value. Boughdad et al. from Saint-Cloud, France, in collaboration with a team from Orsay, France, investigated whether SUV and TI in breast cancer differed in relation to metastatic status, Ki67 expression, grade and molecular subtype in 122 women who underwent FDG PET/CT for initial staging [55]. Volume, SUV, TLG and homogeneity, entropy, LRE, SRE, LGZE and HGZE were measured in each volume of interest obtained using a 40% threshold and exceeding 1.5 mL in volume. There were no significant differences in SUV and TI between metastatic and non-metastatic patients, whereas significant differences were found for TLG (p = 0.028) and volume (p < 0.05).

Fig. 13
figure 13

Two patients with breast cancer (a and b) with similar SUVmax but very different primary tumour MTV and TLG. a SUVmax 8.8, MTV 96.5, TLG 396.65; b SUVmax 8.5, MTV 2.7, TLG 10.8

Interestingly, a team in Milan, Italy, in 44 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer confirmed the potential prognostic value of TLG, and reported that SUV and TI may also be of value because they showed significant correlations with tumour grade, Ki67 expression and molecular subtype [56]. These different findings suggest the potential value of quantitative indices derived from 18F-FDG PET in breast cancer, but the discrepancies among the reports demonstrate that prospective multicentre clinical trials need to be performed in a homogeneous stratified population using a harmonized method to determine the real prognostic value of PET biomarkers. The free software LIFEx developed by the team in Orsay that allows the calculation of indices characterizing tumour heterogeneity should facilitate the collection of data by independent centres [57].

Non-FDG tracers in clinical use

Promising clinical results were also reported with tracers other than 18F-FDG, that allowed better detection or characterization of lesions, especially brain tumours and in haematological diseases. Chiaravalloti et al. from Rome reported the value of posttreatment 18F-FDOPA PET/CT in 134 patients with primary brain tumours. Median PFS was 4 months in patients with a PET/CT-positive scan and 25 months in patients with a PET/CT-negative scan (P < 0.0001), and median OS was 13 months in patients with a PET/CT-positive scan and 27 months in patients with a PET/CT-negative scan (P < 0.0001) [58]. Skvortsova et al. from the Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain of the Russian Academy of Sciences assessed the diagnostic accuracy of 11C-methionine in distinguishing brain tumour recurrence from posttreatment radiation effect (PTRE) in 308 patients with glioma (n = 304) or other tumours (n = 4) previously treated with multimodal therapy [59]. PET was assessed visually and by calculating an 11C-methionine uptake index (UI) as the ratio of the mean lesion uptake to normal cortex uptake. Of lesions with negative tracer uptake (UI < 1.2), 96% represented PTRE or complete metabolic response of glioma, and of lesions with UI > 2.0, 89% represented recurrence. The additional use of MR perfusion allowed the differentiation of lesions with equivocal uptake.

Lopci et al. from Milan prospectively evaluated the relationship between 11C-methionine PET metrics and molecular biomarkers in 109 patients with brain glioma who were candidates for surgery (NCT02518061) [60]. Semiquantitative metrics included SUVmax, SUVratio in relation to normal brain, and MTV. In all patients, tumours were detected with significant differences in SUVmax, SUVratio and MTV in relation to tumour grade (p < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation between SUVmax and SUVratio and IDH1 mutation was observed (p < 0.001). Relapse or progression was documented in 48 patients (median PFS 8.7 months). Statistically significant correlations were observed between PFS and SUVmax and SUVratio, tumour grade, IDH1 mutation, 1p/19q codeletion and MGMT-promoter methylation.

These different reports suggest a PET-derived indices for tumour characterization since their simplicity of interpretation makes their transfer to routine clinical practice likely. Interestingly, a team in Vienna reported the use of computer-support and machine learning algorithms for tumour grading [61,62,63]. The proposed method was used to grade three different tumour types (glioma, breast cancer and prostate cancer), and high sensitivity and specificity were achieved (Fig. 14). The results indicate that machine learning-based tumour grading has huge potential as a computer-aided decision support method for proper tumour grading and prognosis.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Machine-learning based tumour grading in three different tumour groups

The role of 11C-methionine PET/CT has also been assessed in patients with multiple myeloma by a team in Pamplona. More tumour lesions were detected by 11C-methionine PET/CT than by 18F-FDG (Fig. 15) [64]. Moreover, Zanoni et al. from Bologna reported preliminary data from a single-centre prospective study suggesting that 18F-FLT might be complementary to 18F-FDG in the detection of lymphoma following a positive or equivocal 18F-FDG PET/CT scan at the end of treatment or follow-up [65].

Fig. 15
figure 15

18F-FDG (a) 11C-methionine (b) PET/CT images in a patient with multiple myeloma. More lesions are shown by 11C-methionine PET/CT (b) than by 18F-FDG (a)

Radionuclide therapy and dosimetry

Radionuclide therapy is a promising treatment strategy for personalized medicine. The cytotoxic mechanisms by which the agents act are different from those of other therapies, with a limited involvement of cross-resistance and the confounding effect of tumour heterogeneity. Radium-223 dichloride is the latest radiopharmaceutical to have been approved for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, having shown an effect on survival in the ALYMPCA phase III study [66]. This trial, together with the NETTER-1 trial discussed above, is potentially of great importance to the nuclear medicine community. Lee et al. from Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, UK, reported a review of 12 months’ experience with 223Ra dichloride for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases [67]. Of 24 patients who completed a 6-month course of intravenous 223Ra treatment between March 2015 and March 2016 prospectively reviewed, 80% showed improvement and in 16% pain remained stable with an overall average decrease in pain score of 2.52. Quality of life was more variable, but 75% still responded or remained stable. Follacchio et al. from Rome reported the effects of 301 223Ra cycles in 63 patients [68]. The rates of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and anaemia were low (three and six patients, respectively), confirming a favourable haematological toxicity profile. Therapy was effective in relieving pain in 44% of patients, and 44% had stable pain and 12% reported worsening of bone pain. All patients with a high skeletal tumour burden at baseline experienced an improvement in bone pain, suggesting that a palliative rather than a therapeutic effect could prevail in patients with advanced disease.

The key questions in the area of dosimetry relate to (a) whether dosimetry is able to predict efficacy or toxicity, and (b) whether dosimetry during the first course of radiotherapy only is sufficient or repeat measurements with adjustments during multiple courses are necessary. Following earlier work showing that the haematological response during 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment is correlated with bone marrow dose [69], Svensson et al. from Lund showed that the radiation exposure of the kidneys affects the haematological response during 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment, probably due to impaired renal erythropoietin production [70]. This result indicates that it would be more straightforward if the cumulative kidney dose could be predicted from first cycle of radiotherapy, but a related study by Reijonen et al. from Helsinki did not support this simplification of methodology [71]. In their study, cohort analysis predicted no significant difference in kidney dose per activity between the first cycle and the three successive cycles in the cohort. The scenario was different when patients were ‘individualized’ for analysis (the highest overestimation was 32% and underestimation 22%; the difference was more than 10% for 15 patients and more than 20% for 5 patients) suggesting that dosimetry is needed in every cycle. Generally the outcomes were complex and variable.


Overall, we consider that the field of nuclear medicine is making auspicious progress in the development of novel multimodal imaging and its application to diagnosis, staging, therapy selection and therapy monitoring. It is an exciting time to be in this field with the development of new and promising tracers for lesion characterization across disease areas and of several new practice-changing clinical diagnostic tracers and targeted therapies. These developments go to support our view that that nuclear medicine is leading the way in personalizing treatment to patients. We thank the organizers for the opportunity to review the outstanding progress in the field.


  1. Bossi P, Resteghini C, Paielli N, Licitra L, Pilotti S, Perrone F. Prognostic and predictive value of EGFR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:74362–79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Keren S, Shoude Z, Lu Z, Beibei Y. Role of EGFR as a prognostic factor for survival in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:2285–95.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burley TA, Martins CD, Da Pieve C, Allott L, Smith R, Ciobota DM, et al. Imaging EGFR in head and neck cancer: useful prognostic and treatment monitoring tool? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S231.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mahoney KM, Rennert PD, Freeman GJ. Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14:561–84.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heskamp S, Molkenboer-Kuenen JDM, van de Vondervoort RHAM, Boerman OC. SPECT/CT imaging of the PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint pathway in syngeneic murine tumor models. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S147.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miranda CS, Burke BP, Lee RE, Nigam S, Clemente G, Thompson JA, et al. CXCR4 chemokine receptor imaging: evaluation and validation of a new configurationally restricted tetraazamacrocyclic CXCR4 antagonist, 64Cu-CB-bicyclam. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S146.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vag T, Gerngross C, Herhaus P, Eiber M, Philipp-Abbrederis K, Graner FP, et al. First experience with chemokine receptor CXCR4-targeted PET imaging of patients with solid cancers. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:741–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leisser A, Raderer M, Mayerhöfer M, Wadsak W, Mitterhauser M, Hartenbach M, et al. Prospective non-invasive evaluation of CXCR4 expression for diagnosis of MALT lymphoma using 68Ga-pentixafor PET/MRI – initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S125.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hekman M, Rijpkema M, Mulders P, Oosterwijk E, Boerman O, Oyen WJG. Zirconium-89-girentuximab PET/CT imaging in renal cell carcinoma: first in man results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S39.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iagaru A, Sonni I, Minamimoto R, Loening A, Vasanawala S. Ga68 RM2 PET/MRI evaluation of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor status in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer and negative conventional imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vassar R, Kovacs DM, Yan R, Wong PC. The beta-secretase enzyme BACE in health and Alzheimer’s disease: regulation, cell biology, function, and therapeutic potential. J Neurosci. 2009;29:12787–94.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearse DD, Hughes ZA. PDE4B as a microglia target to reduce neuroinflammation. Glia. 2016;64:1698–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lashuel HA, Overk CR, Oueslati A, Masliah E. The many faces of α-synuclein: from structure and toxicity to therapeutic target. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:38–48.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Takano A, Chen L, Nag S, Brodney MA, Amini N, Chang C, et al. Radio-labeling and initial evaluation of a novel beta-secretase (BACE)-selective PET radioligand, [18F]PF-06684511, in nonhuman primates. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S94.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen L, Zasadny K, Beck EM, Chang C, Chappie T, Coelho RV, et al. In vivo evaluation of [18F]PF-06445974, a novel phosphodiesterase 4D sparing PET radioligand for the phosphodiesterase 4 enzyme, in nonhuman primates. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S97.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hooshyar Yousefi B, Mohring M, Arzberger T, Höglinger G, Wester H, Schwaiger M. Novel compounds for specific visualization of α-synucleinopathies by PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S22.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Strauss H, Gheysens O, Hustinx R, Goldman S, Eissler K, Lyons E, et al. Safety analysis of a novel fatty acid analog 18-F FCPHA, data from a phase II study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S536.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Varasteh Z, Hyafil F, Diallo D, Aid R, Anizan N, Mohring M, Vigne J, et al. Targeting mannose receptor (MR) expressed on macrophages for imaging of atherosclerosis in a murine model using tilmanocept. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S131.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nagy G, Szikra D, Trencsényi G, Fekete A, Garai I, Giani AM, et al. AAZTA: an ideal chelating agent for the development of 44Sc PET imaging agents. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:2118–22.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Walczak R, Krajewski S, Szkliniarz K, Sitarz M, Abbas K, Choiński J, et al. Cyclotron production of (43)Sc for PET imaging. EJNMMI Phys. 2015;2(1):33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sitarz M, Szkliniarz K, Walczak R, Jastrzębski J, Choiński J, Majkowska A, et al. Production yield and isotopic purity of medical Sc radioisotopes formed by proton, deuteron and alpha particle beams. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S200.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fraum TJ, Fowler KJ, McConathy J. PET/MRI: emerging clinical applications in oncology. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:220–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grech-Sollars M, Ordidge KL, Vaqas B, Honeyfield L, Khan S, Camp S, et al. 18F-fluoromethylcholine (FMC) PET/CT and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; imaging and tissue biomarkers of cell membrane turnover in primary brain gliomas – a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S195.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ladefoged CN, Benoit D, Law I, Holm S, Kjær A, Højgaard L, et al. Region specific optimization of continuous linear attenuation coefficients based on UTE (RESOLUTE): application to PET/MR brain imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:8047–65.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ladefoged CN, Law I, Hassing C, Højgaard L, Andersen FL. The use of RESOLUTE brain attenuation correction in [18F]-fluoroethyl- tyrosine (18F-FET) PET/MRI of gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S177.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sonni I, Minamimoto R, Taviani V, Loening A, Gambhir SS, Vasanawala S, et al. Imaging patients with breast and prostate cancers using combined 18F-NaF/18F-FDG and TOF simultaneous PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S152.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hartenbach M, Baltzer P, Hartenbach S, Susani M, Seitz C, Kenner L, et al. Staging primary prostate cancer with 68Ga-PSMAHBED-CC/[18F]fluorocholine-PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S165.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Abgral R, Dweck MR, Trivieri MG, Robson PM, Karakatsanis N, Mani V, et al. Usefulness of combined FDG-PET/MR to diagnose active cardiac sarcoidosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S61.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pillai MR, Nanabala R, Joy A, Sasikumar A, Russ Knapp FF. Radiolabeled enzyme inhibitors and binding agents targeting PSMA: effective theranostic tools for imaging and therapy of prostate cancer. Nucl Med Biol. 2016;43:692–720.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Berliner C, Tienken M, Frenzel T, Kobayashi Y, Helberg A, Kirchner U, et al. Detection rate of PET/CT in patients with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer using [68Ga]PSMA I&T and comparison with published data of [68Ga]PSMA HBED-CC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:670–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Einspieler I, Rauscher I, Düwel C, Krönke M, Rischpler C, Habl G, et al. Detection efficacy of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after primary radiation therapy defined by Phoenix criteria. J Nucl Med. 2017. doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.184457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Delker A, Fendler WP, Kratochwil C, Brunegraf A, Gosewisch A, Gildehaus FJ, et al. Dosimetry for (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617: a new radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:42–51.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heck MM, Retz M, D’Alessandria C, Rauscher I, Scheidhauer K, Maurer T, et al. Systemic radioligand therapy with (177)Lu labeled prostate specific membrane antigen ligand for imaging and therapy in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;196:382–91.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Giesel FL, Weis M, Verburg FA, Mottaghy F, et al. 225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA-targeted α-radiation therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1941–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kiess AP, Minn I, Vaidyanathan G, Hobbs RF, Josefsson A, Shen C, et al. (2S)-2-(3-(1-Carboxy-5-(4-211At-astatobenzamido)pentyl)ureido)-pentanedioic acid for PSMA-targeted α-particle radiopharmaceutical therapy. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1569–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ceci F, Castellucci P, Graziani T, Fonti C, Lodi F, Boschi S, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for early restaging prostate cancer. Preliminary results of a prospective trial in patients with biochemical failure after radical therapy and PSA levels <2 ng/mL. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S28.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nielsen JB, Zacho HD, Dettmann K, Landkilde NC, Jensen JB, Haberkorn U, et al. Detection rates of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with biochemical relapse from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and PSA values <1 ng/ml: preliminary results from a prospective, multicenter trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S35.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Uprimny C, Kroiss A, Decristoforo C, Scarpa L, Kendler D, Geraldo L, et al. Validation of 68Ga-PSMA-ligand-PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S138.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schiller C, Beheshti M, Geinitz H, Aschacher B, Moinfar F, Broinger G, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in preoperative staging of intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S167.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gangemi V, Damiano R, Calabria F, Barbato F, Cascini GL. Preliminary experience with Cu64PSMA PETCT in patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer (PC) before prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S344.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ferdinandus J, Eppard E, Kürpig S, Gärtner F, Fimmers R, Yordanova A, et al. Predictors of better response to radioligand therapy of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer with 177Lu-PSMA-617. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S212.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Khurshid Z, Ahmadzadehfar H, Gaertner F, Papp L, Zsótér N, Essler M, et al. Pre-(177Lu-PSMA) therapy response prediction by textural heterogeneity parameters in 68Ga-PSMA PET scans among patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S235.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kulkarni HR, Singh A, Baum RP. Differential response of bone versus lymph node metastases after Lu-177 labelled PSMA radioligand therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S37.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kletting P, Hardiansyah D, Beer AJ, Glatting G. Protection of normal tissue in molecular radiotherapy with 177Lu-labeled PSMA-targeting peptides using preloading. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S36.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Strosberg J, Wolin E, Chasen B, Kulke M, Bushnell D, Caplin M, et al. NETTER-1 phase III in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumours treated with 177Lu-Dotatate: efficacy and safety results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S121.

    Google Scholar 

  46. McEwan AJB, Wieler M, Sawyer MB, Morrish DW, Schaitel BA, Schrader LD, et al. Induction and maintenance regimen with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: Lu-177-DOTA-TATE (PRRT) improves progression free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S158.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kunikowska J, Pawlak D, Bak M, Kos-Kudla B, Mikolajczak R, Krolicki L. Tandem peptide radionuclide therapy with 90Y/177Lu-DOTATATE clinical results and long term side effect – 10 years’ experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S121.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Filice A, Fioroni F, Grassi E, Tartaglione A, Fraternali A, Asti M, et al. Can PET/CT 68Ga-DOTA-peptides uptake predict the absorbed dose in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S224.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nicolas G, Schreiter N, Kaul F, Uiters J, Mena R, Bauman A, Kaufmann J, et al. Comparison between the antagonist 68Ga-OPS202 and the agonist 68Ga-DOTATOC for somatostatin receptor PET/CT in gastroenteropancreatic NET patients: results of a phase 1/2 study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S50.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dubash SR, Keat N, Mapelli P, Twyman F, Carroll L, Kozlowski K, et al. Biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and first preliminary results of a novel 18F-fluoroethyl triazole [Tyr3] octreotate analogue for PET imaging in locally advanced and metastatic neuroendocrine tumour patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S105.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Müeller SP, et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3048–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Kanoun S, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Tal I, Edeline V, Cottereau A, Brice P, et al. Prognosis value of baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL): ancillary study of AHL2011 LYSA trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S125.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bailly C, Carlier T, Meignan M, Gallazzini Crepin C, Beriollo Riedinger A, Devillers A, et al. Prognosis value of FDG-PET parameters at diagnosis and after induction in patients with mantle cell lymphoma, interim results from the LyMa-PET project, a LYSA study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S202.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Martinez de Bourio M, Jimenez-Ballvé A, Salsidua Arroyo O, Serrano-Palacio A, Ortega-Candil A, Rodriguez-Rey C, et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: utility of volumetric parameters in 18F-FDG PET/CT scans to predict recurrence and overall survival. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S274.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Boughdad S, Nioche C, Orlhac F, Champion L, Alberini J, Buvat I. Variations of FDG PET/CT SUV and textural indices in breast cancer according to metastatic status. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S270.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Antunovic L, Gallivanone F, Sagona A, Manfrinato G, Sollini M, Kirienko M, et al. Advanced 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging analysis in selected series of breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S75.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nioche C, Orlhac F, Soussan M, Boughdad S, Alberini J, Buvat I. A software for characterizing intra-tumor heterogeneity in multimodality imaging and establishing reference charts. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S156.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chiaravalloti A, Fiorentini A, Villani V, Carapella C, D’Elia A, Sannino P, et al. Overall survival and progression free survival in patients with primary brain tumors after treatment. Is 18F FDOPA PET/CT a prognostic factor in these patients? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S195.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Skvortsova T, Savintseva Z, Zakhs D, Medvedev S, Bechtereva NP. Diagnostic value of PET using [11C]methionine in suspected glioma recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S260.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lopci E, Riva M, Olivari L, Raneri F, Bizzi A, Fernandes B, et al. Prognostic significance of molecular and imaging biomarkers in primary brain tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S196.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Papp L, Nakuz TS, Magometschnigg HF, Pinker K, Haug A, Helbich TH, et al. Breast cancer grading of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and patient-derived statistical features based on supervised machine-learning approaches. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S75.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Papp L, Hartenbach S, Duhovic A, Baltzer P, Rausch I, Beyer T, et al. Evaluation of primary prostate pathologies by large-scale analysis of non-invasive PET-MRI features with machine-learning approaches. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S150.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Papp L, Pötsch N, Mitterhauser M, Wadsak W, Beyer T, Hacker M, et al. Automated grading of glioma based on MET-PET and patient-derived features utilizing multi-layer machine learning approaches. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S193.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Garcia B, Morales M, Guillen EF, Figueroa R, Marcos M, Moran V, et al. 11C-methionine PET/CT in multiple myeloma: comparison with 18FDG PET/CT and diagnostic value through clinical and biological parameters. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S127.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zanoni L, Broccoli A, Lambertini A, Pellegrini C, Stefoni V, Lodi F, et al. The role of 18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) in patients with suspected lymphoma relapse. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S233.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O’Sullivan JM, Fosså SD, et al. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:213–23.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lee HH, McAddy NC, O’Sullivan P, Crawley P, Beesley S, Naji M. Radium-223 dichloride treatment for prostate cancer with bone metastases: a symptomatic outcome review of 12 months experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Follacchio GA, Frantellizzi V, Liberatore M, Monteleone F, DeVincentis G. Pain response and acute hematologic toxicity in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients (pts) treated with 223Ra-dichloride: a single-center clinical series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S214.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Svensson J, Hagmarker L, Magnander T, Wängberg B, Bernhardt P. Radiation exposure of the spleen during (177)Lu-DOTATATE treatment and its correlation with haematological toxicity and spleen volume. EJNMMI Phys. 2016;3:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Svensson J, Hermann R, Holgersson K, Wängberg B, Sundlöv A, Tennvall J, et al. Radiation exposure of the kidneys affects haematological response during 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S159.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Reijonen V, Heikkonen J, Mäenpää H. Can the cumulative kidney dose be predicted on the basis of the first cycle in the standard Lu-177-octreotate treatment? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(Suppl 1):S189.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The publication of this article was supported by funds of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré.

Ethics declarations


No specific funding was received for this review.

Conflict of interest


Ethical approval

This review describes two studies performed by the authors [50, 53] involving human participants in which all procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aboagye, E.O., Kraeber-Bodéré, F. Highlights lecture EANM 2016: “Embracing molecular imaging and multi-modal imaging: a smart move for nuclear medicine towards personalized medicine”. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44, 1559–1574 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Highlights lecture
  • EANM
  • Personalized medicine
  • Oncology
  • Cardiology
  • Neurosciences