Skip to main content
Download PDF

Very high coronary artery calcium score with normal myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging is associated with a moderate incidence of severe coronary artery disease

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging volume 42, pages 1542–1550 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has limitations in the presence of balanced multivessel disease (MVD) and left main (LM) coronary artery disease, occasionally resulting in false-normal results despite the high cardiovascular risk associated with this condition. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of severe coronary artery disease (CAD) in the presence of a very high Agatston coronary artery calcium (CAC) score (>1,000) in stable symptomatic patients without known CAD but with normal MPI results.

Methods

A total of 2,659 prospectively acquired consecutive patients were referred for MPI and evaluation of CAC score by CT. Of this patient population, 8 % (222/2,659) had ischemia without myocardial infarction (MI) on MPIand 11 % (298/2,659) had abnormal MPI (MI and/or ischemia). On presentation 1 % of the patients (26/2,659) were symptomatic, had a CAC score >1,000 and normal MPI results. The definition of normal MPI was strict and included a normal hemodynamic response without ischemic ECG changes and normal imaging, particularly absence of transient ischemic dilation. All of these 26 patients with a CAC score >1,000 and normal MPI findings underwent cardiac catheterization.

Results

Of these 26 patients, 58 % (15/26) had severe disease (≥70 % stenosis) leading to revascularization. Of this group, 47 % (7/15) underwent percutaneous intervention, and 53 % (8/15) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. All of these 15 patients had either MVD (14/15) or LM coronary artery disease (1/15), and represented 0.6 % (15/2,659) of all referred patients (95 % CI 0.3 – 0.9 %). The majority, 90 % (8/9), had severe CAD with typical chest pain.

Conclusion

A very high CAC score (>1,000) with normal MPI in a small subset of symptomatically stable patients was associated with a moderate incidence of severe CAD (95 % CI 37 – 77 %). Larger studies and/or a meta-analysis of small studies are needed to more precisely estimate the incidence of CAD in this population. This study also supports the concept that a normal MPI result in patients with severe CAD may be due to balanced MVD.

Introduction

Patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) results on SPECT have a very low cardiac event rate estimated at <1 % per year [1–3]. Although rare, left main (LM) coronary artery disease, and balanced multivessel disease (MVD) can result in a falsely normal MPI study despite the high associated cardiovascular risk [4, 5]. Only a fraction of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) involving the LM artery or MVD have perfusion abnormalities in all the coronary artery territories on MPI [6]. Clinical information, exercise data and other stress parameters provide important additional information to identify these patients [4, 7–12].

Atherosclerosis may be associated with calcium deposition in the coronary arteries [13]. Coronary calcification can be quantified on CT using the Agatston coronary artery calcium (CAC) score (see the CAC bibliography, that includes reviews, in Appendix 1 of the Electronic supplementary material). CAC scoring has been used in asymptomatic individuals to diagnose atherosclerosis and to predict future cardiac events, i.e., to determine the long-term 10-year mortality rate beyond the Framingham risk score. High CAC scores are associated with a greater degree of stenosis and ischemia. The distribution of CAC scores in patients with normal MPI is wide.

Our hypothesis was that a very high CAC score of >1,000 with normal MPI, in the absence of high-risk markers, particularly transient ischemic dilation (TID), would be associated with severe MVD.

Materials and methods

Patient population

We prospectively evaluated 2,659 consecutive patients, referred by internists and cardiologists for clinical reasons, for a hybrid study involving both MPI and CAC scoring between January 2007 and July 2011 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of patient enrollment. MPI myocardial perfusion imaging, CAC score Agatston coronary artery calcium score, CAD coronary artery disease, LM left main coronary artery disease

Full size image

Our study was approved by our local university ethics board. All patients signed written informed consent to be entered into a registry and be followed clinically. The consent did not include an invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The patients completed a written cardiac questionnaire and were interviewed by a cardiology nurse and a nuclear cardiology physician. Historical evaluation included: previous cardiac testing, procedures, and consultation reports which were reviewed by a Nuclear Medicine fellow and a Cardiology fellow. The characteristics of the 2,659 patients referred are presented in detail in Appendix 2 of the Electronic supplementary material.

We found 26 patients without known CAD with normal MPI and a CAC score of >1,000 and without high-risk parameters, particularly absence of transient TID. High risk parameters did not include the CAC score, an independent variable. The demographics of the 26 patients with normal MPI and a CAC score of >1,000 are shown in Table 1. The pretest probability of CAD was determined using the model of Diamond et al. [14].

Table 1 Demographics of the 26 patients with coronary artery calcium score > 1,000
Full size table

Physician-supervised maximum-workload symptom-limited exercise [15] was performed if possible, with or without pharmacological vasodilation. Target heart rate was not a criterion for stopping exercise.

Myocardial imaging

For details of the technique see Appendix 3 of the Electronic supplementary material (Myocardial Imaging Technique) which follow the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology guidelines [16]. The definition of normal MPI was strict (Appendix 4 of the Electronic supplementary material: Definition of a Normal MPI [17–21]). In summary, normal MPI included normal images with normal hemodynamic response and without ischemia on ECG, and absence of TID (the normal TID ratio is <1.20).

Coronary calcium score

The Agatston CAC scores were obtained on a GE LightSpeed VCT 64-detector CT scanner within 1 week of the stress MPI study and analyzed using an AW 4.4 workstation [22]. A very high CAC score was defined as >1,000. This value has been used in multiple studies to define a very high CAC score in asymptomatic individuals to predict future cardiac events beyond the Framingham risk score [2, 22, 23]. CAC scores were acquired and analyzed by one experienced technologist using prospective ECG gating, a 2.5-mm slice thickness, 120 kV tube voltage, 200 mAs tube current per rotation, and a large field-of-view of 50 × 50 cm. The CAC score was calculated with commercially available software (Smartscore, GE Healthcare) [21].

Coronary angiography

We prospectively encouraged these symptomatic patients with normal MPI and a very high CAC score of >1,000 to undergo ICA, as our hypothesis was that a clinically significant incidence of severe CAD would be present in this population. All 26 patients underwent ICA. A visual grading system was used to assess the severity of lesions in all major coronary arteries. Stenosis was defined as: no stenosis (0 – 24 %), mild (25 – 49 %), moderate (50 – 69 %) and severe 70 – 100 %), except for LM coronary artery disease where moderate stenosis was 25 – 49 % and severe stenosis was 50 % or greater [24]. Catheterization was performed using Siemens Axiom Artis equipment. The scoring system reflects the most severe stenosis in each major vessel, i.e. the LM coronary artery (we assigned to two-vessel disease), the left anterior descending coronary artery, the left circumflex coronary artery, and the right coronary artery, or their major branch vessels >1.5 mm in diameter). The intermediate ramus branch was defined as a branch of the left anterior descending coronary artery by convention.

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was performed with commercially available software (SPSS version 16.0), and confirmed with previously available RS/1 software (BBN technologies). Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and continuous variables as means ± SD for normal distributions and medians ± interquartile ranges (IQRs) for skewed distributions. Variables were compared with Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and by Student‘s unpaired t test for continuous variables, unless otherwise specified. Two-tailed P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographics of patients with CAC score >1,000 and normal MPI

The demographics of the 26 symptomatic patients without known CAD with normal MPI results and a CAC score of >1,000 are shown in Table 1.

CAC scores

The mean CAC score in the 26 patients was 2,131 (range 1,104 – 5,194). The mean CAC score in the 15 patients with severe CAD was 2,229 (range 1,106 – 5,194), and the mean CAC score in the 11 patients without severe CAD was 2,093 (range 1,104 – 3,585; P = 0.58, not significant). Thus the CAC scores were similar.

Left ventricular ejection fraction

The median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the 15 patients with severe CAD (≥70 % stenosis) was 65 % (IQR 5 %), and the median LVEF in the 11 patients without severe CAD was also 65 % (IQR 5 %; P = 0.99, not significant).

Coronary angiography

Table 2 shows the ICA results in all 26 patients including 9 patients with normal coronary arteries or mild CAD and 17 patients with moderate to severe CAD. Of the 17 patients with moderate to severe CAD, approximately two-thirds (ten patients, nine with severe CAD) had three-vessel disease, approximately one-third (six patients, all with severe CAD) had two-vessel disease (LM coronary artery disease was categorized as two-vessel disease), and one patient with moderate CAD had single-vessel disease. Thus 15 patients (58 %) had severe CAD (≥70 % stenosis). None of the patients with severe CAD (n = 15) had single-vessel disease, 6 (40 %) had two-vessel disease and 9 (60 %) had three-vessel disease.

Table 2 Coronary angiography results in all 26 patients
Full size table

Percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass grafting

Of the 15 patients with severe CAD, 7 (47 %) underwent stenting and 8 (54 %) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting.

Number of CAD risk factors

The patients with and without severe stenosis had, on average, two CAD risk factors. The number of CAD risk factors in 15 patients with severe CAD was 1.8 ± 1.3 and in 11 patients without severe CAD was 2.0 ± 1.2 (P = 0.69, not significant).

Typical chest pain

Of the 26 patients, 17 had atypical chest pain and 9 had typical chest pain. As shown in Table 3, typical chest pain occurred in 8 of the 15 patients with severe CAD and was significantly more frequent in those with than in those without severe CAD (P = 0.04) being present in only 1 (9 %) of the 11 patients without severe CAD. Thus the incidence of severe CAD was 90 % (8 of 9 patients) among those with typical chest pain with a normal MPI result and CAC score >1,000.

Table 3 Typical chest pain
Full size table

Stress testing

Pharmacological vasodilator stress alone was performed in the minority of patients (Table 4). Only 1 of the 15 patients with a falsely normal MPI result and severe obstructive CAD (≥70 % stenosis) underwent pharmacological vasodilator stress without supplementary exercise.

Table 4 Stress testing
Full size table

Index case

A 79-year-old man (178 cm, 85 kg) had typical chest pain, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Two-day MPI was performed using half-time acquisition. Dipyridamole plus gentle cycling (50 W) was used for stress, with 1,000 MBq of sestamibi for rest and stress imaging and iterative reconstruction with attenuation correction and depth resolution recovery (Fig. 2). This showed homogeneous perfusion with questionable TID visually. The left ventricle did not appear larger after stress, either visually (not shown) or quantitatively using filtered back projection reconstruction (TID 1.15; normal <1.20). The CAC score was 4,024 (Fig. 3). ICA showed a severe stenosis in the left main coronary artery distally with poststenotic dilation (aneurysm formation; Fig. 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Two-day (rest/stress) MPI study using half dose in a patient with typical chest pain. Attenuation-corrected (AC) images with iterative reconstruction and depth-dependent resolution recovery (stress images above and corresponding rest images below) do not show a perfusion defect. The images without attenuation correction (not shown) had a normal transient dilation ratio of 1.15 (normal <1.20). Attenuation artifacts disappeared with attenuation correction. These attenuation corrected images with depth resolution recovery show possible transient dilation ratio visually. Normal range for transient dilation ratio with attenuation correction is not known

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Dense coronary artery calcification in the left main coronary artery (LM) distally and in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). The coronary artery calcium score was 4,024. Arrows indicate the mid-LM coronary artery and the proximal LAD coronary artery

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Selective coronary angiogram with catheter in the left main coronary artery (LM). Severe stenosis with tapering of the left main coronary artery distally and with poststenotic dilation (aneurysm) are seen. Arrows indicate the mid-LM coronary artery and tight stenosis of the LM coronary artery distally

Full size image

Discussion

Our study showed a moderate incidence of severe obstructive multivessel CAD in all 26 symptomatic patients without known CAD with a normal MPI result and a CAC score of >1,000. All underwent ICA. The other patients with normal MPI who had a CAC score <1,000 are shown in Appendix 5 of the Electronic supplementary material. This group appeared to have a lower pretest probability of CAD as expected as shown in in Appendix 6 of the Electronic supplementary material. Ischemia is more closely related to the absolute CAC score than CAC percentile scores adjusted for age, ethnicity, and gender [25], as is prognosis. We used an absolute CAC score.

False-negative MPI studies in patients with LM coronary artery disease and/or MVD is a limitation of MPI. In one study, without accounting for high-risk nonperfusion variables, LM coronary artery disease and/or MVD were missed in 17 % of patients with normal MPI [4]. The disease was not missed in any patient when high-risk variables were considered, particularly TID. Many of these patients (45 %, 45/101) underwent exercise stress testing alone. In another study, 58 consecutive patients with a normal MPI result underwent ICA [5]. Of these 58 patients, 18 had 30 stenoses (>50 % stenosis). Logistic regression analysis revealed typical angina to have the strongest association. Typical angina in patients referred for noninvasive imaging has recently been shown [26, 27] to have a lower predictive value than originally proposed by Diamond et al. [14]. The work of Diamond et al. was based on patients interviewed by a cardiologist, and was not based on self-administered cardiac questionnaires, and all the patients underwent ICA. In our study, 90 % of the patients (eight of nine) with typical chest pain, a CAC score >1,000, and normal MPI, had severe CAD (stenosis ≥70 %). By combining high-risk nonperfusion variables, particularly TID, clinical variables, particularly typical angina, and a very high CAC score, the likelihood of false-negative MPI studies may be reduced.

Our study expands the limited literature (two papers) angiographically demonstrating CAD in patients with normal MPI, and a high CAC score [28, 29]. Choudhary et al. [28] examined a small number of patients (n = 84) with normal MPI and a high CAC score. CAD was documented on coronary CT angiography (CCTA), but not on ICA. The rate of abnormalities among our patients was low, although greater than among the patients in the study by Choudhary et al. In our study, 11 % of patients (298/2,659) had an abnormal MPI result. In the study by Choudhary et al., 4 % of patients (3/84) had an MPI abnormality (less robust). Choudhary et al. chose a lower CAC score of >400. The other study of false-negative MPI results in patients with a very high CAC score of >1,000 was by Ghadri et al. [29] whose patients underwent ICA. Single-vessel disease was more prevalent in the study by Ghadri et al. being seen in 41 % [15/29] of patients with a false-negative MPI result and a CAC score >1,000, whereas none of our patients, who had more severe stenosis (≥70 %) and normal MPI, had single-vessel disease. The studies by Ghadri et al. and Choudhary et al. differ from our study in that stenosis was defined visually as 50 % or greater, whereas we chose 70 % or greater, except in LM coronary artery disease where we chose 50 % or greater. The false-negative rate found by Choudhary et al. and Ghadri et al. might have been related to the lack of exercise with vasodilator pharmacological stress. Choudhary et al. used dipyridamole in some of their patients, without exercise. Ghadri et al. used , Rozanski et al. [31] assessed the frequency of cardiac death and myocardial infarction over a mean follow-up of 32 ± 16 months in 1,153 patients undergoing both CAC scanning and MPI. Of these patients, 140 (28 ischemic, 112 nonischemic) had a CAC score >1,000. The authors excluded revascularized patients (10 of the 112 nonischemic patients underwent early revascularization at <60 days or late revascularization at >60 days), in contrast to our study in which such patients were included. They suggested that high CAC scores do not confer an increased risk of cardiac events. The excluded group of patients who underwent revascularization (9 % of non-ischemic patients) might have been at greater risk of cardiac death/myocardial infarction events. The true number of patients with severe CAD could be greater as not all patients with a CAC score >1,000 underwent ICA. This is partial verification bias. Follow-up with at least 80 % success only occurred for 2 years (50 % follow-up at 3 years). Therefore, prognosis assessment was short-term.

Study strengths

All patients in our study completed a self-administered cardiac questionnaire and were interviewed by a cardiology nurse and a nuclear cardiologist. Data were recorded using a predesigned form specifically designed to support a research database. The large-scale CAC score studies obtained patient information solely from patient-completed cardiac questionnaires [2, 26]. By performing MPI and assessing CAC simultaneously, we reduced a source of referral bias to CAC scoring [32]. Maximum-workload symptom-limited exercise was performed whenever possible in addition to pharmacological stress. All patients had ICA. This eliminated partial verification bias (posttest referral bias). The “gold standard” in our study was ICA, not CCTA. Multiple studies by highly experienced readers at respected academic institutions have shown lower diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CCTA compared with ICA, particularly in patients with CAC scores above 400 [33–36]. CCTA often requires aggressive pretreatment with beta blockers to achieve diagnostic quality images whereas ICA does not.

Study limitations

Our study had a limited selection of physician-referred patients, as do all single-center studies. Dyspnea was entered into the database, whether subjective or objective, whether expected (e.g. pulmonary disease) or due to other disease, or due to advanced age, deconditioning or unexpected disease (possible angina equivalence). Thus, the incidence of dyspnea was high in our referred population. We investigated a very small subgroup. This subgroup would have been larger if our selection criteria had been broader (we strictly defined “normal” MPI to avoid the possibility of including patients with any abnormality or possible abnormality). However, we wanted to determine the incremental value of one variable. We used visual assessment of the degree of stenosis on ICA. We did not use functional flow reserve (FFR) [37]. A coronary stenosis apparent visually may not be hemodynamically significant.

Comparison of the severity of coronary artery stenosis on ICA and functional severity as assessed using FFR showed that 35 % of 50 – 70 % stenoses and 80 % of 71 – 90 % stenoses were functionally significant and almost all substantially occluded arteries (96 %) were significantly affected [37]; clearly stenosis of 70 % or greater correlates better with functional assessment than stenosis of 50 % or greater. The lack of FFR assessment in our study would probably have had no effect as 15 of 26 patients (58 %) had severe disease, and only 2 patients (7 %) with moderate disease might have benefited from FFR.

We used SPECT MPI rather than quantitative PET; the latter is better at detecting balanced disease [9]. Quantitative three-dimensional myocardial blood flow imaging with PET is not as available as SPECT. The incidence of false-negative MPI results could have been greater in our 2,659 patients than we have reported, since we only examined patients with a CAC score of >1,000. Dyspnea was noted in 37 % (973/2,659) of our referred patients. Dyspnea includes subjective (patient declared) and physician determined objective dyspnea not explained by pulmonary disease (angina equivalence).

Clinical applicability, generalizability and clinical relevance

CT attenuation-corrected MPI requires an emission and a transmission scan. A single transmission scan can be used for CT attenuation correction of the rest and stress MPI emission scans. The CAC score can be used for CT attenuation correction of SPECT and PET images [38]. Thus, the CAC score can be obtained without another transmission scan acquisition. There are vendors currently offering traditional sodium iodide crystal/photomultiplier tube Anger systems with an integrated multislice diagnostic CT scanner, e.g. a six-slice CT scanner. The newer solid-state cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) gamma cameras may not have integrated attenuation correction capability. Currently a 64-slice CT system integrated with a CZT camera is commercially available. CZT MPI studies without an integrated diagnostic CT scanner require a separate acquisition for a transmission map either using a low-end CT scanner, not capable of obtaining a CAC score, or using a separate stand-alone CT scanner capable of obtaining a CAC score.

The importance of perfusion versus anatomy (CCTA/ICA) in risk stratification is under investigation. MPI currently remains an important widely available method for risk stratification, particularly in older patients. TID is lauded as a clinically useful marker of severe CAD [20]. This was based on treadmill exercise MPI without attenuation correction with greater than 85 % heart rate. However, two recent studies in which stress was not limited to adequate treadmill exercise demonstrated low yield and nonspecifically of TID [39, 40]. Another recent study has also shown that attenuation correction can increase TID to abnormal levels [26]. Thus MPI, even with attenuation correction, can miss balanced CAD.

Temporal stability of results

In our referred population, interim analysis half-way into the study showed the same incidence of severe CAD in patients with a CAC score >1,000 and normal MPI (6 of 14 patients); the final combined proportion of patients with severe CAD was 15 of 26. Thus, among our patients with normal MPI and a CAC score >1,000, there was temporal stability in the proportion who had severe obstructive CAD. The confidence interval for the proportion of patients (57.7 %, 15 of 26) with severe CAD, normal MPI and CAC score >1,000 was 36.9 – 76.7 %. Larger studies and/or a meta-analysis of small studies are needed to more precisely estimate the CAD incidence in this population. However, this is the current best estimate.

Cost effectiveness and clinical utility of a hybrid CAC score plus MPI study

MPI is well known to be cost effective, for example in reducing the number of cardiac catheterizations. A CAC score prior to MPI has recently been suggested to allow selection of patients at higher risk of ischemia [41] and may lead to fewer normal MPI examinations. However, it is known that a zero CAC score alone cannot rule out obstructive noncalcified CAD [42, 43]. The cost effectiveness and clinical utility of a routine hybrid CAC score plus MPI study needs to be determined.

Conclusion

We prospectively determined the incidence of severe CAD in living patients with a very high CAC score and normal MPI in contrast to previous long-term retrospective studies investigating 10-year all-cause mortality. In symptomatic patients without known CAD a very high CAC score (>1,000) with a normal MPI result (high-risk stress markers, particularly TID, absent) was associated with an intermediate probability of severe CAD, typically requiring revascularization.

References

  1. Soman P, Parsons A, Lahiri N, Lahiri A. The prognostic value of a normal Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT study in suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6:252–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, Weinstein SR, Mosler TP, Tseng PA, et al. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1860–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE. Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11:171–85.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, Gerlach J, de Yang L, Hayes SW, et al. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:521–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujimoto S, Wagatsuma K, Uchida Y, Nii H, Nakano M, Toda M, et al. Study of the predictors and lesion characteristics of ischemic heart disease patients with false negative results in stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission tomography. Circ J. 2006;70:297–303.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christian TF, Miller TD, Bailey KR, Gibbons RJ. Noninvasive identification of severe coronary artery disease using exercise tomographic thallium-201 imaging. Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:14–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dash H, Massie BM, Botvinick EH, Brundage BH. The noninvasive identification of left main and three-vessel coronary artery disease by myocardial stress perfusion scintigraphy and treadmill exercise electrocardiography. Circulation. 1979;60:276–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iskandrian AS, Heo J, Lemlek J, Ogilby JD. Identification of high-risk patients with left main and three-vessel coronary artery disease using stepwise discriminant analysis of clinical, exercise, and tomographic thallium data. Am Heart J. 1993;125:221–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ziadi MC, Beanlands RS. The clinical utility of assessing myocardial blood flow using positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:571–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duvernoy CS, Ficaro EP, Karabajakian MZ, Rose PA, Corbett JR. Improved detection of left main coronary artery disease with attenuation-corrected SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2000;7:639–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams KA, Schuster RA, Williams Jr KA, Schneider CM, Pokharna HK. Correct spatial normalization of myocardial perfusion SPECT improves detection of multivessel coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2003;10:353–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hung GU, Chen CP, Yang KT. Incremental value of ischemic stunning on the detection of severe and extensive coronary artery disease in dipyridamole Tl-201 gated myocardial perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiol. 2005;105:108–10.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation. 1995;92:2157–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Diamond GA, Forrester JS, Hirsch M, Staniloff HM, Vas R, Berman DS, et al. Application of conditional probability analysis to the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest. 1980;65:1210–21.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahlberg AW, Baghdasarian SB, Athar H, Thompsen JP, Katten DM, Noble GL, et al. Symptom-limited exercise combined with dipyridamole stress: prognostic value in assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease by use of gated SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:42–56.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hendel RC, Budoff MJ, Cardella JF, Chambers CE, Dent JM, Fitzgerald DM, et al. ACC/AHA/ACR/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/ SCCT/SCMR/SIR 2008 key data elements and definitions for cardiac imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Data Standards for Cardiac Imaging). Circulation. 2009;119:154–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Lai S, Cohen I, Lewin HC, et al. Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1999;100:1035–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abidov A, Bax JJ, Hayes SW, Hachamovitch R, Cohen I, Gerlach J, et al. Transient ischemic dilation ratio of the left ventricle is a significant predictor of future cardiac events in patients with otherwise normal myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1818–25.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abidov A, Germano G, Berman DS. Transient ischemic dilation ratio: a universal high-risk diagnostic marker in myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:497–500.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu Y, Arsanjani R, Clond M, Hyun M, Lemley Jr M, Fish M, et al. Transient ischemic dilation for coronary artery disease in quantitative analysis of same-day sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:465–73.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Williams KA, Schneider CM. Increased stress right ventricular activity on dual isotope perfusion SPECT: a sign of multivessel and/or left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:420–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte Jr M, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Oei HH, van Dijck W, van Rooij FJ, et al. Coronary calcification improves cardiovascular risk prediction in the elderly. Circulation. 2005;112:572–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen ML, Mo YH, Wang YC, Lo HS, Wang PC, Chao IM, et al. 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of functionally significant coronary stenoses: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:368–76.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ali I, Ruddy TD, Almgrahi A, Anstett FG, Wells RG. Half-time SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with attenuation correction. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:554–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Berman DS, Wong ND, Gransar H, Miranda-Peats R, Dahlbeck J, Hayes SW, et al. Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:923–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng VY, Berman DS, Rozanski A, Dunning AM, Achenbach S, Al-Mahllah M, et al. Performance of the traditional age, sex, and angina typicality-based approach for estimating pretest probability of angiographically significant coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the multinational coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry (CONFIRM). Circulation. 2011;124:2423–32.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Choudhary G, Shin V, Punjani S, Ritter N, Sharma SC, Wu WC. The role of calcium score and CT angiography in the medical management of patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:45–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghadri JR, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, Goetti R, Buechel RR, Husmann L, et al. Very high coronary calcium score unmasks obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with normal SPECT MPI. Heart. 2011;97:998–1003.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schepsis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P, Ruegg C, Burger C, Leschka S, et al. Use of coronary calcium score scans from stand-alone multislice computed tomography for attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:11–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rozanski A, Gransar H, Wong ND, Shaw LJ, Miranda-Peats R, Polk D, et al. Clinical outcomes after both coronary calcium scanning and exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1352–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Harris JP, Behar VS, Conley MJ, Harrell FE, Lee KL, Peter RH, et al. The prognostic significance of 50% coronary stenosis in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1980;62:240–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hachamovitch R, Di Carli MF. Methods and limitations of assessing new noninvasive tests: part I: anatomy-based validation of noninvasive testing. Circulation. 2008;117:2684–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Goldin JG, Greenland P, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114:1761–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2135–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, rbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Valdiviezo C, Motivala AA, Hachamovitch R, Chamarthy M, Navarro PC, Ostfeld RJ, et al. The significance of transient ischemia dilation in the setting of otherwise normal SPECT radionuclide myocardial perfusion images. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:220–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mandour Ali MA, Bourque JM, Allam AH, Beller GA, Watson DD. The prevalence and predictive accuracy of quantitatively defined transient ischemia dilation of the left ventricle on otherwise normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging studies. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:1036–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ottenhof MJ, Wai MC, Boiten HJ, Korbee RS, Valkema R, van Domburg RT, et al. 12-year outcome after normal myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with known coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20:748–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Villines TC, Hulten EA, Shaw LJ, Goyal M, Dunning A, Achenbach S, et al. Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(24):2533–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Al-Mallah MH, Qureshi W, Lin FY, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, et al. Does coronary CT angiography improve risk stratification over coronary calcium scoring in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease? Results from the prospective multicenter international CONFIRM registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15(3):267–74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ryan MacDonald and Mahmoud Badreddine of the Nuclear Medicine Department for their significant contribution to this study.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road East, PO Box 5010, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada

    Salem A. Yuoness, Ahmed M. Goha, Jonathan G. Romsa, Cigdem Akincioglu, James C. Warrington, Sudip Datta, Sanjay Gambhir, Jean-Luc C. Urbain & William C. Vezina

  2. Division of Cardiology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada

    David R. Massel

  3. Private Practice, London, Ontario, Canada

    Rafael Martell

Authors
  1. Salem A. Yuoness
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed M. Goha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan G. Romsa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cigdem Akincioglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James C. Warrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sudip Datta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. David R. Massel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rafael Martell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sanjay Gambhir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jean-Luc C. Urbain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. William C. Vezina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William C. Vezina.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 76 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuoness, S.A., Goha, A.M., Romsa, J.G. et al. Very high coronary artery calcium score with normal myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging is associated with a moderate incidence of severe coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42, 1542–1550 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3072-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3072-z

Keywords

  • CT coronary artery calcium score
  • Myocardial perfusion imaging
  • Sestamibi