The association of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters with survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma
- 618 Downloads
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a disease with poor prognosis despite multimodal therapy but there is variation in survival between patients. Prognostic information is therefore potentially valuable in managing patients, particularly in the context of clinical trials where patients could be stratified according to risk. Therefore we have evaluated the prognostic ability of parameters derived from baseline 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT).
In order to determine the relationships between metabolic activity and prognosis we reviewed all 18F-FDG PET/CT scans used for pretreatment staging of MPM patients in our institution between January 2005 and December 2011 (n = 60) and measured standardised uptake values (SUV) including mean, maximum and peak values, metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Overall survival (OS) or time to last censor was recorded, as well as histological subtypes.
Median follow-up was 12.7 months (1.9–60.9) and median OS was 14.1 months (1.9–54.9). By univariable analysis histological subtype (p = 0.013), TLG (p = 0.024) and MTV (p = 0.038) were significantly associated with OS and SUVmax was borderline (p = 0.051). On multivariable analysis histological subtype and TLG were associated with OS but at borderline statistical significance (p = 0.060 and 0.058, respectively). No statistically significant differences in any PET parameters were found between the epithelioid and non-epithelioid histological subtypes.
18F-FDG PET/CT parameters that take into account functional volume (MTV, TLG) show significant associations with survival in patients with MPM before adjusting for histological subtype and are worthy of further evaluation to determine their ability to stratify patients in clinical trials.
KeywordsMesothelioma 18F-FDG PET/CT Prognosis Standardised uptake value Total lesion glycolysis Metabolic tumour volume
- 13.Boucek J, Francis RJ, Green AJ. Automated approach to identification and quantitation of tumour volumes in chemotherapy monitoring using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 2005;46:464P.Google Scholar
- 19.Francis RJ, Byrne MJ, van der Schaaf AA, Boucek JA, Nowak AK, Phillips M, et al. Early prediction of response to chemotherapy and survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma using a novel semiautomated 3-dimensional volume-based analysis of serial 18F-FDG PET scans. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1449–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Melton GB, Lavely WC, Jacene HA, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Wahl RL, et al. Efficacy of preoperative combined 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography for assessing primary rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:961–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Larson SM, Erdi Y, Akhurst T, Mazumdar M, Macapinlac HA, Finn RD, et al. Tumor treatment response based on visual and quantitative changes in global tumor glycolysis using PET-FDG imaging. The visual response score and the change in total lesion glycolysis. Clin Positron Imaging 1999;2:159–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Kadota K, Kachala SS, Nitadori J, Suzuki K, Dunphy MP, Sima CS, et al. High SUVmax on FDG-PET indicates pleomorphic subtype in epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma: supportive evidence to reclassify pleomorphic as nonepithelioid histology. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:1192–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Pleural mesothelioma. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 271–7.Google Scholar