Skip to main content
Log in

Association of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony with survival benefit from revascularization: a study of gated positron emission tomography in patients with ischemic LV dysfunction and narrow QRS

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

LV mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) is a risk marker in narrow QRS cardiomyopathy, but its association with treatment outcome is not well defined. We determined the incremental prognostic value of LVMD in ischemic cardiomyopathy, and assessed its interaction with scar, myocardium in jeopardy and subsequent revascularization.

Methods

Stress and rest 82Rb gated PET were performed in 486 consecutive patients (66 ± 11 years of age, 82 % men, LV ejection fraction 26 ± 6 %) with ischemic cardiomyopathy and QRS <120 ms. LVMD was determined as the standard deviation (SD) of the regional time to minimum volume on phase analysis of the gated PET scan. A propensity score was determined to adjust for nonrandomized referral after imaging to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In a Cox proportional hazards model used to determine the association between measures of LVMD and survival time, CABG was included as a time-dependent covariate and the use of an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) after imaging was modeled as a stratification factor.

Results

Over 1.9 ± 1.4 years, 96 patients (20 %) underwent CABG and 108 (22 %) died. LVMD was a predictor of mortality (HR 1.16. 95 % CI 1.03;1.30, per 10° increase in phase SD, p = 0.02) after adjusting for baseline covariates, prior ICD use, the use of postimaging CABG, and other imaging data. There was a significant interaction between phase SD and CABG. Nested Cox models showed that LVMD carried prognostic information incremental to clinical variables, ejection fraction and CABG.

Conclusion

LVMD is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in ischemic cardiomyopathy, and may identify patients with a differential survival benefit from CABG versus medical therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bader H, Garrigue S, Lafitte S, Reuter S, Jais P, Haissaguerre M, et al. Intra-left ventricular electromechanical asynchrony. A new independent predictor of severe cardiac events in heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:248–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fauchier L, Marie O, Casset-Senon D, Babuty D, Cosnay P, Fauchier JP. Interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a prognostic study with fourier phase analysis of radionuclide angioscintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:2022–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH, Molhoek SG, Boersma E, Steendijk P, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1834–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delgado V, van Bommel RJ, Bertini M, Borleffs CJ, Marsan NA, Arnold CT, et al. Relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony, left ventricular lead position, and myocardial scar to predict long-term survival of ischemic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2011;123:70–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Henneman MM, Chen J, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel MP, Bleeker GB, Ypenburg C, et al. Can LV dyssynchrony as assessed with phase analysis on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT predict response to CRT? J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho GY, Song JK, Park WJ, Han SW, Choi SH, Doo YC, et al. Mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by tissue Doppler imaging is a powerful predictor of mortality in congestive heart failure with normal QRS duration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trimble MA, Borges-Neto S, Honeycutt EF, Shaw LK, Pagnanelli R, Chen J, et al. Evaluation of mechanical dyssynchrony and myocardial perfusion using phase analysis of gated SPECT imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:663–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beshai JF, Grimm RA, Nagueh SF, Baker JH, Beau SL, Greenberg SM, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with narrow QRS complexes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2461–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marwick TH, Starling RC. The riddle of determining cardiac resynchronization therapy response a physiologic approach to dyssynchrony therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1410–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adelstein EC, Saba S. Scar burden by myocardial perfusion imaging predicts echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2007;153:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haugaa KH, Amlie JP, Berge KE, Leren TP, Smiseth OA, Edvardsen T. Transmural differences in myocardial contraction in long-QT syndrome: mechanical consequences of ion channel dysfunction. Circulation. 2010;122:1355–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haugaa KH, Edvardsen T, Leren TP, Gran JM, Smiseth OA, Amlie JP. Left ventricular mechanical dispersion by tissue Doppler imaging: a novel approach for identifying high-risk individuals with long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:330–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haugaa KH, Smedsrud MK, Steen T, Kongsgaard E, Loennechen JP, Skjaerpe T, et al. Mechanical dispersion assessed by myocardial strain in patients after myocardial infarction for risk prediction of ventricular arrhythmia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:247–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. AlJaroudi W, Alraies M, DiFillipo F, Brunken R, Cerqueira M, Jaber W. Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony should be assessed from stress gated positron emission tomography in patients with normal myocardial perfusion. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:665–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 1979;237:E214–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ficaro EP, Lee BC, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:455–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. AlJaroudi W, Jaber WA, Grimm RA, Marwick T, Cerqueira MD (2011) Alternative methods for the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony using phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011. doi:10.1007/s10554-011-9963-6

  18. Jeevanantham V, Zareba W, Navaneethan S, Fitzgerald D, Yu CM, Achilli A, et al. Metaanalysis on effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with narrow QRS complex. Cardiol J. 2008;15:230–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Bommel RJ, Gorcsan 3rd J, Chung ES, Abraham WT, Gjestvang FT, Leclercq C, et al. Effects of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure having a narrow QRS Complex enrolled in PROSPECT. Heart. 2010;96:1107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Udelson JE. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1151–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hachamovitch R, Rozanski A, Shaw LJ, Stone GW, Thomson LE, Friedman JD, et al. Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1012–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aljaroudi WA, Hage FG, Hermann D, Doppalapudi H, Venkataraman R, Heo J, et al. Relation of left-ventricular dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated SPECT images and cardiovascular events in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. AlJaroudi W, Chen J, Jaber WA, Lloyd SG, Cerqueira MD, Marwick T. Nonechocardiographic imaging in evaluation for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:334–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Bleeker GB, Boersma E, et al. Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography compared with tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1708–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marsan NA, Henneman MM, Chen J, Ypenburg C, Dibbets P, Ghio S, et al. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography as a novel approach to quantify left ventricular dyssynchrony: a comparison study with phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:801–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Trimble MA, Velazquez EJ, Adams GL, Honeycutt EF, Pagnanelli RA, Barnhart HX, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of phase analysis of gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging used to quantify cardiac dyssynchrony. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:374–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen J, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Garcia EV. Temporal resolution of multiharmonic phase analysis of ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15:383–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Di Carli MF, Davidson M, Little R, Khanna S, Mody FV, Brunken RC, et al. Value of metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography for evaluating prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:527–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Einstein AJ, Johnson LL, Bokhari S, Son J, Thompson RC, Bateman TM, et al. Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1914–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barbosa JG, Figueiredo B, Bettencourt N, Tavares JM. Towards automatic quantification of the epicardial fat in non-contrasted CT images. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2011;14:905–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Uebleis C, Ulbrich M, Tegtmeyer R, Schuessler F, Haserueck N, Siebermair J, et al. Electrocardiogram-gated 18F-FDG PET/CT hybrid imaging in patients with unsatisfactory response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: initial clinical results. J Nucl Med. 2010;52:67–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cheung A, Zhou Y, Faber TL, Garcia EV, Zhu L, Chen J. The performance of phase analysis of gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in the presence of perfusion defects: a simulation study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:500–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The project was funded by the American Heart Association National Clinical Research Program 11CRP5180029.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wael AlJaroudi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

AlJaroudi, W., Alraies, M.C., Hachamovitch, R. et al. Association of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony with survival benefit from revascularization: a study of gated positron emission tomography in patients with ischemic LV dysfunction and narrow QRS. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39, 1581–1591 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2171-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2171-3

Keywords

Navigation