Abstract
Purpose
Between 30 and 50% of febrile neutropenic episodes are accounted for by infection. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a nonspecific parameter for infection and inflammation but might be employed as a trigger for diagnosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT can be used to detect inflammatory foci in neutropenic patients with elevated CRP and whether it helps to direct treatment.
Methods
Twenty-eight consecutive patients with neutropenia as a result of intensive chemotherapy for haematological malignancies or myeloablative therapy for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation were prospectively included. 18F-FDG PET/CT was added to the regular diagnostic workup once the CRP level rose above 50 mg/l.
Results
Pathological FDG uptake was found in 26 of 28 cases despite peripheral neutrophil counts less than 0.1 × 10−9/l in 26 patients: in the digestive tract in 18 cases, around the tract of the central venous catheter (CVC) in 9 and in the lungs in 7 cases. FDG uptake in the CVC tract was associated with coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteraemia (p < 0.001) and deep venous thrombosis (p = 0.002). The number of patients having Streptococcus mitis bacteraemia appeared to be higher in patients with grade 3 oesophageal FDG uptake (p = 0.08). Pulmonary FDG uptake was associated with the presence of invasive fungal disease (p = 0.04).
Conclusion
18F-FDG PET/CT scanning during chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and increased CRP is able to detect localized foci of infection and inflammation despite the absence of circulating neutrophils. Besides its potential role in detecting CVC-related infection during febrile neutropenia, the high negative predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT is important for avoiding unnecessary diagnostic tests and therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Fever frequently develops during the profound neutropenia induced by intensive chemotherapy but is not always related to infection. It has long been the standard of care to start treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics promptly once fever is observed because infection can be life-threatening. Between 30 and 50% of febrile episodes are caused by infection. Most cases are caused by bacteraemia, but invasive fungal pulmonary disease also occurs, and this is the most important infectious cause of death in stem cell recipients with mortality rates varying between 50 and 90% [1–3]. Inflammation of the mucosa of the digestive tract induced by cytotoxic treatment of haematological malignancies manifests itself as mucositis and also leads to elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and fever, often preceding certain types of bacteraemia typically with Streptococcus mitis [4, 5].
Coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) bacteraemia is seen in 30% of recipients of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and the central venous catheter (CVC) usually implanted to manage most patients is assumed to be the source of this bacteraemia. Transient bacteraemia secondary to mucosal barrier injury, however, may also lead to infection of the CVC and to catheter-related thrombi [6–8].
Early recognition of infection contributes to better patient outcomes [2, 9]. Unnecessary treatment, on the other hand, is associated with side effects, the development of resistant microorganisms and increased costs [10–12]. Hence, it is important to attempt to distinguish fever due to mucosal barrier injury and fever caused by infection whenever possible. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) proved capable of detecting localized infectious and noninfectious inflammatory foci in immunocompetent patients often before any anatomical changes could be detected by conventional radiological techniques [13–16]. Since 18F-FDG PET/CT depends not only on neutrophils, it was hypothesized that this technique can also be used in severely neutropenic patients [17–19].
We therefore performed a prospective observational study among patients given myeloablative chemotherapy for haematological malignancies. The aim of the study was to determine whether 18F-FDG PET/CT allows detection of inflammatory foci in patients with severe neutropenia. We also explored the possibility of using 18F-FDG PET/CT to direct treatment of infectious complications in patients with elevated CRP levels during neutropenia. 18F-FDG PET/CT was also evaluated for pathological FDG uptake in the digestive tract because of expected mucosal barrier injury.
Materials and methods
This was a prospective, descriptive study in which the relationship between clinically defined infection (CDI) and microbiologically defined infection (MDI) with 18F-FDG PET/CT findings was defined. The Regional Ethics Committee granted approval (CMO nr 11231).
Patients
All consecutive patients admitted between November 2006 and June 2007 to the Department of Haematology for remission induction or consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or for a HSCT following myeloablative therapy, were eligible provided treatment was expected to result in neutropenia of more than 7 days duration. CRP levels (upper limit of normal 10 mg/l) were determined twice weekly and an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was made as soon as the CRP concentration exceeded 50 mg/l. Patients were withdrawn from the study when there was evidence of haemodynamic instability, diabetes mellitus if insulin had to be administered within 4 h before the 18F-FDG PET/CT scan or when glucose levels exceeded 15 mmol/l at the time of 18F-FDG PET/CT. The study ended when the patient was discharged. All patients gave written informed consent.
18F-FDG PET/CT
An integrated PET/CT scanner (Siemens Biograph, Knoxville, TN, USA) was used for data acquisition. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines [20]. Before FDG injection, patients fasted and glucose or insulin-containing intravenous infusions were discontinued for 6 h. One hour after intravenous injection of 3.5 MBq/kg FDG (Covidien, Petten, The Netherlands), a low-dose CT of the area between the proximal femora and the base of the skull was made for anatomical correlation and attenuation correction of the PET data. Subsequently, emission images of the same area were acquired. FDG uptake in the digestive tract was compared to liver uptake. The digestive tract was divided into three anatomical regions: oesophagus, small bowel and colon. Lack of FDG uptake was graded as 0, FDG uptake less than that in the liver was designated grade 1, equal to liver uptake as grade 2 and as grade 3 when uptake was more than that in the liver [21].
Low dose CT versus high-resolution CT (HRCT) of the thorax
18F-FDG PET/CT was combined with HRCT of the thorax when HRCT of the thorax was indicated because of suspected invasive pulmonary fungal disease [10, 22–24]. The trigger for ordering HRCT for high-risk patients included the following: signs or symptoms of pulmonary disease, abnormal chest X-ray, a plasma galactomannan index of >0.5 or fever persisting for >4 days despite broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment.
Regular patient monitoring
Monitoring of patients was performed according to standard clinical practice. CRP determination was the only additional test to the regularly scheduled laboratory tests. 18F-FDG PET/CT was included in the regular diagnostic workup when CRP exceeded 50 mg/l. Additional investigations to confirm 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were only performed when clinically justified. Epidemiological data, the number, type and results of all diagnostic tests and treatment data were registered in an electronic case record form (FileMaker Pro 9.0).
Confirmation of 18F-FDG PET/CT findings
18F-FDG PET/CT reading was performed by two nuclear medicine physicians. The low-dose CT provided anatomical reference for 18F-FDG PET abnormalities and was not used for diagnostic purposes. On the same day, this was reported to the attending physician. To be included in patient management, 18F-FDG PET/CT findings had to be supported by clinical evidence, microbiological tests and routine radiology. Invasive techniques such as biopsy, bronchoscopy or endoscopy were only performed when clinically indicated.
The 18F-FDG PET/CT assessments were independently re-evaluated (F.V. and W.O.) without knowledge of the final diagnosis or the outcome. At a later stage, a differential diagnosis of febrile neutropenia was made independently without knowledge of the 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment by an infectious disease specialist (F.V.) and a specialist in infectious diseases in haematology (P.D.).
Clinical features
Bacteraemia was defined by the recovery of a microorganism from a single percutaneous blood culture, except for members of the skin commensal flora such as CoNS or coryneforms in which case an identical isolate had to be recovered from two simultaneous sets of percutaneous blood cultures, or from each lumen of a three- or four-lumen CVC. Bacteraemia was deemed persistent when blood cultures drawn on at least 2 separate days yielded growth of the same isolate.
Catheter exit site infection was defined by the development of any of the following manifestations within 2 cm of the exit site: erythema or tenderness or induration or seropurulent discharge (CDI). When any potential pathogen was isolated from a specimen of the exit site or >15 colony-forming units (cfu) were isolated in pure culture from segment A (the external catheter) or segment B (the subcutaneous part of the catheter), the infection was deemed an MDI. Tunnel infection was defined by the development of any of the following along the subcutaneous tract: cellulitis, erythema or tenderness or induration with or without an exit site infection. In the absence of a specimen of the tunnel infection, the cause was assumed to be the same as that of an exit site infection when one existed. Septic thrombophlebitis at the site of a CVC was defined as persistent bacteraemia, and deep venous thrombosis as diagnosed by ultrasound or venography, and no other source of infection explaining the persistence of bacteraemia [25]. No specific testing for mucosal bowel injury was performed. Citrulline levels, however, have shown to be a reproducible measure for intestinal villous mass [26]. Measurement of citrulline levels had been performed in the majority of the patients. Citrulline levels below 10 μmol/l have been interpreted as severe mucosal bowel injury in other studies and replace other indirect functional tests to assess cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy [27]. Invasive fungal disease (IFD) was classified as possible, probable and proven according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) guidelines [10].
Outcome parameters
The primary outcome parameter was the ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to locate an inflammatory (infectious or noninfectious) focus during neutropenia. Secondary outcome parameters were the ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to be used to direct treatment of infectious complications in patients with elevated CRP levels during neutropenia and the ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to depict mucosal barrier injury.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were done to compare 18F-FDG PET/CT with current practice regarding identification of infectious or inflammatory foci explaining fever or other potential signs of infection. Per anatomical area patients with or without pathological FDG uptake were assessed for the presence of a clinically and microbiologically defined illness. Differences between patients with or without pathological FDG uptake were tested using Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Differences were considered to be statistically significant when the p value was less than 0.05 (two-sided).
Results
A total of 37 eligible patients provided written consent. CRP levels remained below 50 mg/l in six cases, one patient who experienced clinical deterioration withdrew consent before 18F-FDG PET/CT could be performed and 18F-FDG PET/CT could not be performed in a further two cases due to technical problems. Hence, 28 cases were evaluated (Table 1).
On average, CRP reached 50 mg/l on day 12 after starting chemotherapy. In 26 of 28 (93%) patients this was accompanied by fever. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed a mean of 14 days after starting chemotherapy when all patients were still profoundly neutropenic: 26 had peripheral neutrophil counts less than 0.1×10−9/l. Pathological FDG uptake was found in 26 of 28 cases (93%) (Table 1). Grade 3 uptake was found in the digestive tract in 18 cases, uptake in the CVC tract was seen in 9 cases and abnormal pulmonary uptake was found in 7 cases. In one case, localized FDG uptake in the right thyroid lobe was found during the neutropenic phase (Fig. 1) although the patient had no localizing symptoms. He deteriorated 1 week later due to persistent candidemia. A second 18F-FDG PET/CT scan, made 3 weeks after the first scan, indicated abscess formation in the right thyroid lobe, which was confirmed by surgical drainage and culture.
FDG uptake in the CVC tract and CoNS bacteraemia
Of the 28 patients included in the study, 26 had a CVC. FDG uptake in the CVC tract was only seen in nine patients, all of whom had persistent CoNS bacteraemia (p < 0.001). The presence of FDG uptake in the CVC tract was not related to clinical signs of exit site or tunnel infection. Ultrasounds were only performed in the presence of local complaints, such as swelling of the arm, to exclude deep venous thrombosis. An ultrasound of the subclavian vein was performed in 11 of 26 (42%) patients, amongst whom all 9 patients with FDG uptake in the CVC tract. In case of deep venous thrombosis alone without concomitant persistent CoNS bacteraemia, FDG uptake in the CVC tract was never seen (see Table 1). Confirmed deep venous thrombosis in combination with persistent CoNS bacteraemia (septic thrombophlebitis) was present in seven patients. Increased FDG uptake in the subclavian tract was found in six of these seven cases with confirmed septic thrombophlebitis. In three patients FDG uptake in the CVC tract was present without confirmed septic thrombophlebitis. Persistent CoNS bacteraemia was present in all three of them, but an ultrasound deep venous thrombosis was ruled out in two of them and was not performed in the last patient.
In the patients without FDG uptake in the CVC tract septic thrombosis was ruled out either by an ultrasound ruling out thrombosis in 1 patient or the absence of persistent bacteraemia in 14 patients. In only one patient could septic thrombophlebitis not be ruled out definitely as despite the presence of persistent CoNS bacteraemia no ultrasound was performed. However, no clinical signs of thrombosis were present. The positive predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the presence of septic thrombophlebitis was 67% and the negative predictive value 94%.
In four of these six cases with septic thrombophlebitis delineated by 18F-FDG PET/CT the first ultrasound was negative and thrombosis could only be confirmed by a second ultrasound, whereas 18F-FDG PET/CT had been positive at the time of the first ultrasound (Fig. 2).
FDG uptake in the intestinal wall and Streptococcus mitis bacteraemia
FDG uptake grade 2 or more was found in the digestive tract, irrespective of the localization, in 24 of 28 (86%) cases. Citrulline levels were known in 20 of 28 patients (see Table 1). In two of the four patients in whom no pathological FDG uptake was found in the digestive tract citrulline levels were measured and below 10 μmol/l. FDG uptake grade 2 or more in the oesophagus and colon were not concomitant (p = 1.0). Grade 3 FDG uptake in the wall of the oesophagus was seen in 11 cases. Endoscopy was not performed in these patients. Of these 11 patients, 7 (64%) had retrosternal complaints consistent with oesophagitis (Fig. 3). Only one of the patients with retrosternal complaints did have Streptococcus mitis bacteraemia. On the other hand there appeared to be an association between Streptococcus mitis bacteraemia and grade 3 oesophageal FDG uptake (p = 0.08), as five of seven patients with Streptococcus mitis bacteraemia did have grade 3 FDG uptake in the oesophagus (Table 2). Grade 3 FDG uptake in the wall of the colon was found in 13 cases, but there was no correlation with Streptococcus mitis bacteraemia (p = 0.2). Four patients had severe abdominal complaints consistent with typhlitis and grade 3 colonic FDG uptake was found in each case (Fig. 4).
Pulmonary FDG uptake and IFD
Proven invasive pulmonary fungal disease was not found, but five patients had possible and two patients had probable IFD (Fig. 5). Pulmonary FDG uptake was present in both cases of probable IFD and in 3 of the 5 cases with possible IFD and in only 2 of 21 patients without IFD. Pulmonary FDG uptake therefore is associated with the presence of IFD (p = 0.04). Probable IFD was never present in the absence of pulmonary FDG uptake.
Discussion
This study shows that localized foci of infection or inflammation can be visualized by 18F-FDG PET/CT during severe neutropenia. It has been shown before that 18F-FDG PET/CT is capable of visualizing localized areas of inflammation by using the accelerated metabolism of different activated inflammatory cells, other then neutrophils, such as macrophages and monocytes [17–19, 28]. This suggests that not only activated neutrophils, but also other inflammatory cells play a role in visualizing localized infection or inflammation by 18F-FDG PET/CT. Some retrospective studies have reported the possibility of visualizing infectious foci by 18F-FDG PET/CT in neutropenic patients, but only a minority of these patients were deeply neutropenic at the time 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in contrast to all of our study patients [25, 29, 30]. In the largest study so far among patients with multiple myeloma (n = 248), 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed for disease staging in most patients (n = 199) and for infection workup in the remaining 49 patients [29]. In total, 165 infectious foci were detected in that study. Neutropenia (<1.0 × 10−9/l) was present in only 27 of 248 (11%) patients, however. Most probably FDG uptake in other activated inflammatory cells is the explanation for the visualization of inflammatory foci on 18F-FDG PET/CT in the vast majority of patients in our study despite neutrophil counts below 0.1 × 109/l [17, 18].
We found a clear correlation between FDG uptake in the CVC tract and septic thrombophlebitis of the subclavian vein. This supports the results of another study on the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of septic thrombophlebitis in which 18F-FDG PET/CT was prospectively conducted in patients with suspected septic thrombophlebitis [25, 30]. 18F-FDG PET/CT showed pathological tracer uptake in all nine patients with proven septic thrombophlebitis. Control patients in that study were collected from a retrospective cohort of patients with deep venous thrombosis without signs of infection in whom an 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed for other reasons. Selection bias in that study makes it impossible to calculate positive and negative predictive values of 18F-FDG PET/CT regarding detection of septic thrombophlebitis. A caveat in our study is, however, that ultrasound was only performed on clinical grounds, so we might have missed asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis. The negative predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the presence of septic thrombophlebitis, however, can be estimated to be high (94%) as in only one patient with persistent bacteraemia was a deep venous thrombosis ruled out solely on the absence of clinical signs. The positive predictive value (67%) regarding septic thrombophlebitis on the other hand might be underestimated in our study, because ultrasound was not performed in all patients precluding these patients from fulfilling the definition of septic thrombophlebitis. In three patients with FDG uptake in the subclavian tract and persistent bacteraemia only one ultrasound was performed. This is important as strikingly 18F-FDG PET/CT seemed to precede detection of the abnormalities on ultrasound of the subclavian vein in four cases of septic thrombophlebitis. Therefore, pathological FDG uptake in the CVC tract in patients with febrile neutropenia should not be ignored as it might have important consequences in CVC management, e.g. line removal, particularly when persistent bacteraemia is diagnosed.
Pulmonary FDG uptake was frequently seen in this study and was related with possible or probable IFD. In the absence of pulmonary FDG uptake probable or definite IFD was never the cause of fever at the time 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed. An adequate comparison with HRCT, which already has an added value in the early recognition of life-threatening IFD, was not possible in our study because 18F-FDG PET/CT and HRCT were not performed within a time frame of several days in enough patients [22–24]. Data show, however, that IFD can be visualized despite profound neutropenia.
Metastatic infection was diagnosed in only one patient with a Candida abscess in the thyroid gland. No other metastatic foci were diagnosed by clinical symptoms or signs or other imaging techniques in our study. Consequently, the negative predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for excluding clinically relevant metastatic foci of infection is likely to be high assuming that these foci reveal themselves due to intensive monitoring for symptoms and signs when left untreated.
Substantial FDG uptake in the digestive tract was seen in almost every case, but digestive tract uptake is contentious as it is known to yield false-positive results [31]. A visual grading for gastrointestinal activity was chosen due to the variability in distribution and extent of the enhanced FDG uptake in the gut. Theoretically, chemotherapy may have influenced FDG uptake in the liver, which was chosen as the organ of reference. However, all patients were scanned at approximately the same point in time during the course of treatment, thus reducing the possibility of chemotherapy-induced variability in liver uptake. Furthermore, none of the patients was receiving metformin at the time the 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed, excluding another important cause of increased FDG uptake [32]
We specified uptake according to the anatomical region and graded uptake comparing it to liver uptake to circumvent this problem as has been done by others for staging disease activity in colitis, which then showed a firm correlation with disease activity [21, 33]. An interesting finding was the possible correlation between oesophageal FDG uptake and Streptococcus mitis bacteraemia, which was not seen in colonic FDG uptake. These findings support the theory that Streptococcus mitis bacteraemia originates from oesophageal mucosal barrier injury [34]. Increased FDG uptake may be the result of mucositis with or without infection since this has been shown to be associated with thickening of the oesophagus [35]. Besides mucosal barrier injury, there may be an additional local factor such as infection due to Streptococcus mitis of the mucosa, resulting in increased FDG uptake [36]. Surprisingly no FDG uptake was found in the digestive tract in some patients despite citrulline levels below 10 μmol/l. Probably this supports the presence of an additional inflammatory factor. Further studies on this subject, however, should be performed.
Conclusion
18F-FDG PET/CT during chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and increased CRP is able to visualize localized foci of infection and inflammation despite the absence of neutrophils in the peripheral blood. Besides the potential role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in early detection and managing specific infectious complications during febrile neutropenia, i.e. septic thrombophlebitis and metastatic infection, its high negative predictive value may help in avoiding unnecessary diagnostics and therapy.
References
Pizzo PA. Management of fever in patients with cancer and treatment-induced neutropenia. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1323–32.
Paul M, Yahav D, Fraser A, Leibovici L. Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57:176–89.
Winston DJ, Hathorn JW, Schuster MG, Schiller GJ, Territo MC. A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Am J Med 2000;108:282–9.
Blijlevens NMA, Donnelly JP, De Pauw BE. Prospective evaluation of gut mucosal barrier injury following various myeloablative regimens for haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005;35:707–11.
Blijlevens NM, Donnelly JP, DePauw BE. Inflammatory response to mucosal barrier injury after myeloablative therapy in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005;36:703–7.
Miceli M, Atoui R, Thertulien R, Barlogie B, Annaissie E, Walker R, et al. Deep septic thrombophlebitis: an unrecognized cause of relapsing bacteremia in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1529–31.
Koolen DA, van Laarhoven HW, Wobbes T, Punt CJ. Single-centre experience with tunnelled central venous catheters in 150 cancer patients. Neth J Med 2002;60:397–401.
Kuter DJ. Thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in cancer patients. Oncologist 2004;9:207–16.
Cordonnier C, Buzyn A, Leverger G, Herbrecht R, Hunault M, Leclercq R, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for gram-positive coccal infections in neutropenia: toward a more targeted antibiotic strategy. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:149–58.
Verweij PE, Donnelly JP, van Die CE, Blijlevens NM, Kullberg BJ, de Pauw BE. Improved diagnostics in invasive aspergillosis and systematic monitoring in patients at high risk of infection. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005;149:561–7.
Donnelly JP. Febrile neutropenia: antifungal prophylaxis. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000;16:127–30.
Klastersky J. Empirical antifungal therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004;23:105–12.
Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, Wanten GJ, van der Meer JW, Corstens FH, Kullberg BJ, et al. 18F-FDG PET in detecting metastatic infectious disease. J Nucl Med 2005;46:2014–9.
Bleeker-Rovers CP, de Kleijn EM, Corstens FH, van der Meer JW, Oyen WJ. Clinical value of FDG PET in patients with fever of unknown origin and patients suspected of focal infection or inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:29–37.
Blockmans D, Knockaert D, Maes A, De Caestecker J, Stroobants S, Bobbaers H, et al. Clinical value of [(18)F]fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for patients with fever of unknown origin. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:191–6.
Vos FJ, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Sturm PD, Krabbe PF, van Dijk AP, Cuijpers ML, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of metastatic infection in gram-positive bacteremia. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1234–40.
Brown RS, Leung JY, Fisher SJ, Frey KA, Ethier SP, Wahl RL. Intratumoral distribution of tritiated fluorodeoxyglucose in breast carcinoma: I. Are inflammatory cells important? J Nucl Med 1995;36:1854–61.
Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, Ishiwata K, Tamahashi N, Ido T. Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography. J Nucl Med 1992;33:1972–80.
Zhuang H, Alavi A. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging in the detection and monitoring of infection and inflammation. Semin Nucl Med 2002;32:47–59.
Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:181–200.
Spier BJ, Perlman SB, Jaskowiak CJ, Reichelderfer M. PET/CT in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: studies in patients before and after treatment. Mol Imaging Biol 2010;12:85–8.
Caillot D, Casasnovas O, Bernard A, Couaillier JF, Durand C, Cuisenier B, et al. Improved management of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic patients using early thoracic computed tomographic scan and surgery. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:139–47.
Barloon TJ, Galvin JR, Mori M, Stanford W, Gingrich RD. High-resolution ultrafast chest CT in the clinical management of febrile bone marrow transplant patients with normal or nonspecific chest roentgenograms. Chest 1991;99:928–33.
Heussel CP, Kauczor HU, Heussel G, Fischer B, Mildenberger P, Thelen M. Early detection of pneumonia in febrile neutropenic patients: use of thin-section CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1347–53.
Miceli MH, Jones Jackson LB, Walker RC, Talamo G, Barlogie B, Anaissie EJ. Diagnosis of infection of implantable central venous catheters by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Nucl Med Commun 2004;25:813–8.
Crenn P, Vahedi K, Lavergne-Slove A, Cynober L, Matuchansky C, Messing B. Plasma citrulline: a marker of enterocyte mass in villous atrophy-associated small bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2003;124:1210–9.
van der Velden WJ, Herbers AH, Feuth T, Schaap NP, Donnelly JP, Blijlevens NM. Intestinal damage determines the inflammatory response and early complications in patients receiving conditioning for a stem cell transplantation. PLoS One 2010;5:e15156.
Salaun PY, Gastinne T, Bodet-Milin C, Campion L, Cambefort P, Moreau A, et al. Analysis of 18F-FDG PET diffuse bone marrow uptake and splenic uptake in staging of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a reflection of disease infiltration or just inflammation? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:1813–21.
Mahfouz T, Miceli MH, Saghafifar F, Stroud S, Jones-Jackson L, Walker R, et al. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography contributes to the diagnosis and management of infections in patients with multiple myeloma: a study of 165 infectious episodes. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7857–63.
Miceli M, Atoui R, Walker R, Mahfouz T, Mirza N, Diaz J, et al. Diagnosis of deep septic thrombophlebitis in cancer patients by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning: a preliminary report. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1949–56.
de Groot M, Meeuwis AP, Kok PJ, Corstens FH, Oyen WJ. Influence of blood glucose level, age and fasting period on non-pathological FDG uptake in heart and gut. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:98–101.
Bybel B, Greenberg ID, Paterson J, Ducharme J, Leslie WD. Increased F-18 FDG intestinal uptake in diabetic patients on metformin: a matched case-control analysis. Clin Nucl Med 2011;36:452–6.
Lemberg DA, Issenman RM, Cawdron R, Green T, Mernagh J, Skehan SJ, et al. Positron emission tomography in the investigation of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2005;11:733–8.
O’Brien SN, Blijlevens NM, Mahfouz TH, Anaissie EJ. Infections in patients with hematological cancer: recent developments. Hematology 2003;438–72.
Blijlevens NM, Donnelly JP, Yakar D, van Die CE, de Witte T. Determining mucosal barrier injury to the oesophagus using CT scan. Support Care Cancer 2007;15:1105–8.
van der Velden WJ, Blijlevens NM, Feuth T, Donnelly JP. Febrile mucositis in haematopoietic SCT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009;43:55–60.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Vos, F.J., Donnelly, J.P., Oyen, W.J.G. et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing infectious complications in patients with severe neutropenia after intensive chemotherapy for haematological malignancy or stem cell transplantation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39, 120–128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1939-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-1939-1