Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

FDG PET/CT for monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Berriolo-Riedinger A, Touzery C, Riedlinger JM, Toubeau M, Coudert B, Arnould L, et al. [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34(12):1915–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Duch J, Fuster D, Muñoz M, Fernández PL, Paredes P, Fontanillas M, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36(10):1551–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rousseau C, Devillers A, Sagan C, Ferrer L, Bridji B, Campion L, et al. Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(34):5366–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwarz-Dose J, Untch M, Tiling R, Sassen S, Mahner S, Kahlert S, et al. Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(4):535–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92(3):205–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Honkoop AH, van Diest PJ, de Jong JS, Linn SC, Giaccone G, Hoekman K, et al. Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1998;77(4):621–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Machiavelli MR, Romero AO, Pérez JE, Lacava JA, Domínguez ME, Rodríguez R, et al. Prognostic significance of pathological response of primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer J Sci Am 1998;4(2):125–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Langer I, Guller U, Viehl CT, Moch H, Wight E, Harder F, et al. Axillary lymph node dissection for sentinel lymph node micrometastases may be safely omitted in early-stage breast cancer patients: long-term outcomes of a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16(12):3366–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gundula Rendl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalus, K., Rendl, G., Rettenbacher, L. et al. FDG PET/CT for monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37, 1992–1993 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1585-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1585-z

Keywords

Navigation