Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sentinel node detection in pre-operative axillary staging

  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery is based on the fact that the tumour drains in a logical way via the lymphatic system, from the first to upper levels. Since axillary node dissection does not improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy might replace complete axillary dissection for staging of the axilla in clinically N0 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy would represent a significant advantage as a minimally invasive procedure, considering that about 70% of patients are found to be free from metastatic disease, yet axillary node dissection can lead to significant morbidity. Subdermal or peritumoural injection of small aliquots (and very low activity) of radiotracer is preferred to intratumoural administration, and 99mTc-labelled colloids with most of the particles in the 100–200 nm size range would be ideal for radioguided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. The success rate of radioguidance in localising the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer surgery is about 97% in institutions where a high number of procedures are performed, and the success rate of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node detection is about 100%. The sentinel lymph node should be processed for intraoperative frozen section examination in its entirety, based on conventional histopathology and, when necessary, immune staining with anti-cytokeratin antibody. Nowadays, lymphoscintigraphy is a useful procedure in patients with different clinical evidence of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 1992; 127:392–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman RR. Sentinel lymphadenectomy and breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:2345–2350.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Bryant J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Twenty-five-year follow up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med 2002; 22:567–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Veronesi U, Luini A, Galimberti V, Marchini S, Sacchini V, Rilke F. Extent of axillary involvement in 1446 cases of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 1990; 16:127–133.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zurrida S, Morabito A, Galimberti V, et al. Importance of the level of axillary involvement in relation to traditional variables in the prognosis of breast cancer. Int J Oncol 1999; 15:475–480.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid AD in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 1997; 349:1864–1867.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paganelli G, De Cicco C, Cremonesi M, et al. Optimized sentinel node scintigraphy in breast cancer. Q J Nucl Med 1998; 42:49–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. De Cicco C, Cremonesi M, Luini A, Bartolomei M, Grana C, Prisco G, Galimberti V, Calza P, Viale G, Veronesi U, Paganelli G. Lymphoscintigraphy and radioguided biopsy of the sentinel axillary node in breast cancer. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:2080–2084.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill AD, Tran KN, Yeung H, Yeh SD, Borgen PI, Cody HS 3rd. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: unfiltered radioisotope is superior to filtered. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188:377–381.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cody HS 3rd, Borgen PI. State-of-the-art approaches to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: study design, patient selection, technique, and quality control at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Surg Oncol 1999; 8:85–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma-probe. Surg Oncol 1993; 2:335–340.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilhelm AJ, Mijnhout GS, Franssen EJF. Radiopharmaceuticals in sentinel lymph-node detection—an overview. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26 (Suppl):S36–S42.

  13. Mariani G, Moresco L, Viale G, Villa G, Bagnasco M, Canavese G, Buscombe J, Strauss HW, Paganelli G. Radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery. J Nucl Med 2001; 42:1198–1215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanis PJ, Valdes Olmos RA, Muller SH, Nieweg OE. Lymphatic mapping in patients with breast carcinoma: reproducibility and lymphoscintigraphic results. Radiology 2003; 228:313–315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roumen RM, Geuskens LM, Valkenburg JG. In search of the true sentinel node by different injection techniques in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25:347–351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Klimberg VS, Rubio IT, Henry R, Cowan C, Colvert M, Korourian S. Subareolar versus peritumoural injection for location of the sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg 1999; 229:860–864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spratt JS, Schieber W, Dillard B. Anatomy and surgical technique of groin dissection. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1965.

  18. Alazraki NP, Styblo T, Grant SF, Cohen C, Larsen T, Aarsvold JN. Sentinel node staging of early breast cancer using lymphoscintigraphy and the intraoperative gamma-detecting probe. Semin Nucl Med 2000; 30:56–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Trifirò G, Travaini L, De Cicco C, Mazzarol G, Intra M, Rocca P, Prisco G, Veronesi U. Internal mammary node lymphoscintigraphy and biopsy in breast cancer. Q J Nucl Med 2002; 46:138–144.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. De Cicco C, Baio SM, Veronesi P, Trifirò G, Ciprian A, Prisco G, Vento A, Rososchansky J, Viale G, Paganelli G. Sentinel node biopsy in male breast cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2004:in press.

  21. Luini A, Gatti G, Frasson A, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed with local anesthesia in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. Arch Surg 2002; 137:1157–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186:275–283.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Borgstein PJ, Meijr S, Pijpers R. Intradermal blue dye to identify sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Lancet 1997; 349:1668–1669.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Borgstein PJ, Meijer S, Pijpers RJ, van Diest PJ. Functional lymphatic anatomy in breast cancer: echoes from the past and the periareolar blue method. Ann Surg 2000; 232:81–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roumen RM, Geuskens LM, Valkenburg JG. In search of the true sentinel node by different injection techniques in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999; 25:347–351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Borgstein P, Meijier S. Historical perspective of lymphatic tumour spread and the emergence of the sentinel node concept. Eur J Surg Oncol 1998; 24:85–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Keshtgar MRS, Ell PJ. Sentinel lymph node detection and imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26:57–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morton DL, Chan AD. The concept of sentinel node localization: how it started. Semin Nucl Med 2000; 30:4–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Handley RS, Trackray AC. Invasion of internal mammary lymph nodes in carcinoma of the breast. Br Med J 1954; 1:61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Noguchi M, Tsugawa K, Miwa K. Internal mammary chain sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer patient. J Surg Oncol 2000; 73:75–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cox CE, Bass SS, Reintgen DS. Techniques for lymphatic mapping in breast carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1999; 8:447–468.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:546–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220:391–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Krag DN, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer—a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:941–946.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilke LG, Giuliano AE. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: status of the National Clinical Trials. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:901–910.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ross MI. Sentinel lymph node dissection in early-stage breast cancer: ongoing prospective randomized trials in the USA. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:778–818.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Krag DN, Julian T. Expert perspectives: update on NSABP B-32, a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection for clinically node-negative breast cancer. Breast Dis Year Book Q 2002; 13:113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Grube BJ, Giuliano AE. Observation of the breast cancer patient with a tumor-positive sentinel node: implications of the ASOCOG Z0011 trial. Semin Surg Oncol 2001; 20:230–237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Breast Study announcements. Durham, N.C.: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group, 2003. (Accessed July 18, 2003 at www.asocog.org/studies/organ_site/breast/.)

  40. Hurkmans CW, Borger JH, Rutgers EJ, et al. Quality assurance of axillary radiotherapy in the EORTC AMAROS trial 10981/22023. Radiother Oncol 2003; 68:233–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Clarke D, Khonji NI, Mansel ER. Sentinel node biopsy in breats cancer: ALMANAC trial. World J Surg 2001; 25:819–822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schwartz GF, Giuliano AE, Veronesi U. Consensus Conference Committee. Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast, April 19–22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cancer 2002; May 15; 94:2542–2551.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bedrosian I, Reynolds C, Mick R, et al. Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with large primary breast tumors. Cancer 2000; 88:2540–2545.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cohen LF, Breslin TM, Kuerer HM, Ross MI, Hunt KK, Sahin AA. Identification and evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24:1266–1272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nason KS, Anderson BO, Byrd DR, et al. Increased false negative sentinel node biopsy rates after preoperative chemotherapy for invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89:2187–2194.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brady EW. Sentinel lymph node mapping following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast J 2002; 8:97–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Breslin TM, Cohen L, Sahin A, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18:3480–3486.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Stearns V, Ewing CA, Slack R, Penannen MF, Hayes DF, Tsangaris TN. Sentinel lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer may reliably represent the axilla except for inflammatory breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9:235–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mamounas EP. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant systemic therapy [review]. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:931–942.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schwartz GF, Meltzer AJ. Accuracy of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy following neoadjuvant (induction) chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast. Breast J 2003; 9:374–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sabel MS, Schott AF, Kleer CG, et al. Sentinel node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg 2003; 186:102–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:2483–2493.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Andea AA, Wallis T, Newman LA, Bouwman D, Dey J, Visscher D. Pathologic analysis of tumor size and lymph node status in multifocal/multicentric breast carcinoma. Cancer 2002; 94:1383–1390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Anderson BO. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer: an update on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Natl Compr Cancer Network 2003; 1:S64–S70.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Reintgen D, Giuliano R, Cox G. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. Cancer J 2002; 8:S15–S21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ozmen V, Muslumanoglu M, Cabioglu N, et al. Increased false negative rates in sentinel lymph node biopsies in patients with multifocal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002; 76:237–244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Grant RN, Tabah EJ, Adair FE. The surgical significance of the subareolar plexus in cancer of the breast. Surgery 1959; 33:71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Schrenk P, Wayand W. Sentinel-node biopsy in axillary lymph-node staging for patients with multicentric breast cancer. Lancet 2001; 357:122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kim HJ, Heerdt AS, Cody HS III, Van Zee KJ. Sentinel node drainage in multicentric breast cancers. Breast J 2002; 8:356–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tousimis E, Van Zee KJ, Fey JV, et al. The accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in multicentric and multifocal invasive breast cancers. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197:529–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kumar R, Jana S, Heiba SI, et al. Retrospective analysis of sentinel node localization in multifocal, multicentric, palpable, or nonpalpable breast cancer. J Nucl Med 2003; 44:7–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. McMaster KM, Giuliano AE, Ross MI, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for breast cancer—not yet the standard of care. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:990–995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ollila DW, Giuliano AE. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy using isosulfan blue dye. Breast Dis 1998; 8:297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C, et al. The effect of prior breast biopsy method and concurrent definitive breast procedure on success and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 9:272–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Miner TJ, Shriver CD, Jaques DP, Maniscalco-Theberge ME, Krag DN. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: the role of previous biopsy on patients eligibility. Am Surg 1999; 65:493–499.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Schnitt SJ, Silen W, Sadowsky NL, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:898–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pendas S, Dauway E, Giuliano R, Ku NN, Cow CE. Sentinel node biopsy in DCIS patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7:15–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Klauber-DeMore N, Tan LK, Liberman L, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy: is it indicated in patients with high-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ and ductal carcinoma-in-situ with microinvasion? Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7:636–642.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Cox CE, Nguyen K, Gray RJ, et al. Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): why map DCIS? Am J Surg 2001; 67:513–519.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Intra M, Veronesi P, Mazzarol G, et al. Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Arch Surg 2003; 138:309–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Carter BA, Jensesn RA, Simpson JF, Page DL. Benign transport of breast epithelium into axillary lymph nodes after biopsy. Am J Pathol 2000; 113:259–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics 2000. CA Cancer J Nlin 2000; 50:7–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Salvadori B, Saccozzi R, Manzari A, Andreola S, Conti RA, Cusumano F, Grassi M. Prognosis in breast cancer in males: an analysis of 170 cases. Eur J Cancer 1994; 7:930–935.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Maijer-van Gelder ME, Look MP, Bolt-de Vries J, Peters HA, Kijn JGM, Foekens JA. Clinical relevance of biologic factors in male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 68:249–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Rush Port E, Fey JV, Cody HS, Borgen PI. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with male breast cancer. Cancer 2001; 91:319–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gennari R, Renne G, Travaini L, Bassi F, Zurrida S. Sentinel node biopsy in male breast cancer: future standard treatment? Eur J Surg 2001; 167:461–462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Woo JC, Yu T, Hurd TC. Breast cancer in pregnancy: a literature review. Arch Surg 2003; 138:91–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Nicklas A, Baker M. Imaging strategies in pregnant cancer patients. Semin Oncol 2000; 27:623–632.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Morita ET, Chang J, Leong SP. Principles and controversies in lymphoscintigraphy with emphasis on breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2000; 80:1721–1739.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Fenaroli P, Tondini C, Motta T, Virotta G, Personenin A. Axillary sentinel node biopsy under local anesthesia in early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2000; 11:1617–1618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Viale G, Bosari S, Mazzarol G, Galimberti V, Luini A, Veronesi P, Paganelli G, Bedoni M, Orvieto E. Intraoperative examination of axillary sentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma patients. Cancer 1999; 85:2433–2438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Chilosi M, Lestani M, Pedron S, Montagna L, Benedetti A, Pizzolo G, Menestrina F. A rapid immunostaining method for frozen sections. Biotech Histochem 1994; 69:235–239.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Hermanek P, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH, Wittekind C. International Union Against Cancer. Classification of isolated tumour cells and micrometastasis. Cancer 1999; 86:2668–2673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. Prognostic importance of occult axillary lymph node micrometastases from breast cancer. Lancet 1990; 335:1565–1568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Dowlatshahi K, Fan M, Snider HC, Habib FA. Lymph node micrometastases from breast carcinoma. Reviewing the dilemma. Cancer 1997; 80:1188–1197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Cote RJ, Peterson HF, Chaiwun B, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gusterson B, Neville AM. Role of immunohistochemical detection of lymph-node metastases in management of breast cancer. Lancet 1999; 354:896–900.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Chu KU, Turner RR, Hansen NM, Brennan MB, Bilchik A, Giuliano AE. Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection? Ann Surg 1999; 229:536–541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Reynolds C, Mick R, Donohue JH, Grant CS, Farley DR, Callans LS, Orel SG, Keeney GL, Lawton TJ, Czerniecki BJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with metastasis: can AD be avoided in some patients with breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:1720–1726.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Viale G, Maiorano E, Mazzarol G, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Luini A, Renne G, Pruneri G, Maisonneuve P, Veronesi U. Histologic detection and clinical implications of micrometastases in axillary sentinel lymph nodes for patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 2001; 92:1378–1384.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Turner RR, Chu KU, Qi K, Botnick LE, Hansen NM, Glass EC, Giuliano AE. Pathologic features associated with nonsentinel lymph node metastases in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma in a sentinel lymph node. Cancer 2000; 89:574–581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Masuda N, Tamaki Y, Sakita I, Ooka M, Ohnishi T, Kadota M, Aritake N, Okubo K, Monden M. Clinical significance of micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes assessed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:4176–4185.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Bostick PJ, Chatteriee S, Chi DD, Huynh KT, Giuliano AE, Cote R, Hoon DS. Limitations of specific reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction markers in the detection of metastases in the lymph nodes and blood of breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:2632–2640.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Bostick PJ, Huynh KT, Sarantou T, Turner RR, Qi K, Giuliano AE, Hoon DS. Detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients by multiple-marker RT-PCR. Int J Cancer 1998; 79:645–651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Kataoka A, Mori M, Sadanaga N, Ueo H, Tsuji K, Ray Y, Barnard GF, Sugimachi K. RT-PCR detection of breast cancer cells in sentinel lymph nodes. Int J Oncol 2000; 16:1147–1152.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Manzotti M, Dell’Orto P, Maisonneuve P, Zurrida S, Mazzarol G, Viale G. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for multiple mRNA markers in the detection of breast cancer metastases in sentinel lymph nodes. Int J Cancer 2001; 95:307–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

    Giuseppe Trifirò, Laura Lavinia Travaini & Giovanni Paganelli

  2. Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Via G. Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy

    Giuseppe Viale

  3. Division of Senology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

    Oreste Gentilini

Authors
  1. Giuseppe Trifirò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giuseppe Viale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oreste Gentilini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura Lavinia Travaini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giovanni Paganelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Paganelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trifirò, G., Viale, G., Gentilini, O. et al. Sentinel node detection in pre-operative axillary staging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31 (Suppl 1), S46–S55 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-004-1526-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-004-1526-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation