Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of post-arthrography high-resolution computed tomography in wrist ligament injuries.
Design and patients: Thirty-six consecutive patients who had a history and clinical findings suggestive of ligamentous injuries of the wrist were prospectively studied. The findings of three-compartment arthrography and post-arthrography computed tomography (arthro-CT) were compared with those of arthroscopy. The evaluation concentrates on the detection and precise localization of ligament lesions in the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC), the scapholunate ligament (SLL) and the lunotriquetral ligament (LTL).
Results: For TFC, SLL and LTL lesions, standard arthrography responded with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 100%, 85% and 100%, 80% and 100% respectively, while arthro-CT showed a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 100%, 100% and 100%, 80% and 100% respectively. The precise localization of the lesions was possible only with arthro-CT.
Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of standard arthrography and arthro-CT are similar, although the latter shows the site of tears or perforation with greater precision, while conventional arthrography demonstrates them indirectly. This precision is essential and may have clinical implications for the success of treatment procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 12 April 2000 Revision requested: 10 July 2000 Revision received: 30 August 2000 Accepted: 29 September 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Theumann, N., Favarger, N., Schnyder, P. et al. Wrist ligament injuries: value of post-arthrography computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 30, 88–93 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560000302
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560000302