Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the role of weekly neurofibromatosis (NF) multi-disciplinary conferences (MDC) on the diagnostic and therapeutic plan for patients with NF type 1 (NF1) and schwannomatosis (SWN).
Materials and methods
This retrospective study reviewed patients with confirmed or suspected NF1 and SWN discussed in weekly MDC from March to July 2021. Demographic data collected included patient age, sex, pre-conference and post-conference diagnosis, radiological studies reviewed, and provider specialties in attendance. Outcomes reported included changes in imaging interpretation and treatment plans, changes in post-conference diagnosis relative to pre-conference diagnosis, and time to completion of the recommended change in treatment.
Results
Data from 17 MDC “pre-conference” lists included 75 patients (38 female, 37 males, mean age (years): 38 (range: 6–80)) with NF1 (52%, 39/75) and SWN (36%, 27/75) discussed over a total of 91 case reviews. 18.7% (14/75) of all patients had NF2-related SWN, and 17.3% (13/75) of all patients had non-NF2 SWN. The MDC led to changes in imaging interpretation in 18.7% and changes in patient management in 74.7% (diagnostic testing (n = 52), surgical plan (n = 24), medical treatment (n = 9), clinical trial status (n = 4), and radiation treatment (n = 1)) of cases. Among patients for whom a change in management was recorded, 91% (62/68) completed at least one recommendation (mean time to completion (days): 41.4 (range: 0–278)).
Conclusion
Weekly MDC changes the diagnostic and therapeutic management of the majority of patients discussed (74.7%) and promotes a high adherence rate to recommendations (91%).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leo F, Venissac N, Poudenx M, Otto J, Mouroux J, Grouped’OncologieThoraciqueAzuréen. Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer: how to test its efficacy? J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:69–72.
Snyder J, Schultz L, Walbert T. The role of tumor board conferences in neuro-oncology: a nationwide provider survey. J Neurooncol. 2017;133:1–7.
Sidhom MA, Poulsen MG. Multidisciplinary care in oncology: medicolegal implications of group decisions. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(11):951–4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17081921/.
Wheless SA, McKinney KA, Zanation AM. A prospective study of the clinical impact of a multidisciplinary head and neck tumor board. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143:650–4.
Thenappan A, Halaweish I, Mody RJ, Smith EA, Geiger JD, Ehrlich PF, et al. Review at a multidisciplinary tumor board impacts critical management decisions of pediatric patients with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017;64:254–8.
Cohen P, Tan AL, Penman A. The multidisciplinary tumor conference in gynecologic oncology–does it alter management? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:1470–2.
Kurpad R, Kim W, Rathmell WK, Godley P, Whang Y, Fielding J, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of urologic malignancies: does it influence diagnostic and treatment decisions? Urol Oncol. 2011;29:378–82.
Lee B, Kim K, Choi JY, Suh DH, No JH, Lee H-Y, et al. Efficacy of the multidisciplinary tumor board conference in gynecologic oncology. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96: e8089.
Khalafallah AM, Jimenez AE, Romo CG, Kamson DO, Kleinberg L, Weingart J, et al. Quantifying the utility of a multidisciplinary neuro-oncology tumor board. J Neurosurg. 2020;135:87–92.
van Hagen P, Spaander MCW, van der Gaast A, van Rij CM, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJB, et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary tumour board meeting for upper-GI malignancies on clinical decision making: a prospective cohort study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013;18:214–9.
Snelgrove RC, Subendran J, Jhaveri K, Thipphavong S, Cummings B, Brierley J, et al. Effect of multidisciplinary cancer conference on treatment plan for patients with primary rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:653–8.
Quero G, Salvatore L, Fiorillo C, Bagalà C, Menghi R, Maria B, et al. The impact of the multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) on the management of pancreatic diseases in a tertiary referral center. ESMO Open. 2021;6:100010.
Lloyd SKW, Evans DGR. Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2): diagnosis and management. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;115:957–67.
Ferner RE, Huson SM, Thomas N, Moss C, Willshaw H, Evans DG, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2007;44:81–8.
Debs P, Fayad LM, Ahlawat S. MR neurography of peripheral nerve tumors and tumor-mimics. Semin Roentgenol. 2022;57:232–40.
Ahlawat S, Blakeley JO, Langmead S, Belzberg AJ, Fayad LM. Current status and recommendations for imaging in neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, and schwannomatosis. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49:199–219.
Kresak JL, Walsh M. Neurofibromatosis: a review of NF1, NF2, and schwannomatosis. J Pediatr Genet. 2016;5:98–104.
Plotkin SR, Messiaen L, Legius E, Pancza P, Avery RA, Blakeley JO, et al. Updated diagnostic criteria and nomenclature for neurofibromatosis type 2 and schwannomatosis: an international consensus recommendation. Genet Med. 2022;24:1967–77.
Hirbe AC, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis type 1: a multidisciplinary approach to care. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:834–43.
Knight SWE, Knight TE, Santiago T, Murphy AJ, Abdelhafeez AH. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors-a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and multidisciplinary management. Children (Basel). 2022;9:38.
Hajiabadi MM, Campos B, Sedlaczek O, Khajeh E, Nikdad M, von Deimling A, et al. Interdisciplinary approach allows minimally invasive, nerve-sparing removal of retroperitoneal peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405:199–205.
Aboukais R, Bonne N-X, Baroncini M, Zairi F, Schapira S, Vincent C, et al. Management of multiple tumors in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients. Neurochirurgie. 2018;64:364–9.
Blay J-Y, Soibinet P, Penel N, Bompas E, Duffaud F, Stoeckle E, et al. Improved survival using specialized multidisciplinary board in sarcoma patients. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2852–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Debs, P., Belzberg, A., Blakeley, J. et al. Multidisciplinary neurofibromatosis conference in the management of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and schwannomatosis in a single tertiary care institution. Skeletal Radiol 53, 909–916 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04511-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04511-4