Abstract
Objective
CT imaging precisely and quantitatively analyzes the kinematics of the carpal bones to evaluate the etiology of related osteoarthritis. Previous studies have investigated the kinematics of the trapeziometacarpal joint using static CT scans of various postures including the pinch position. This study analyzed the in-vivo kinematics of the trapeziometacarpal joint during dynamic pinch motion in young healthy volunteers using four-dimensional CT.
Materials and methods
Twelve healthy young volunteers participated in this study. Each participant held the pinch meter between their thumb and index finger and pinched it with maximum force for a period of 6 s. This series of movement was recorded using a four-dimensional CT. The surface data of the trapezium and first metacarpal of all frames were reconstructed, and bone movement at the trapeziometacarpal joint was calculated using sequential three-dimensional registration. The instantaneous pinch force of each frame was measured using a pointer on a pinch meter that was reconstructed from the CT data.
Results
The first metacarpal was abducted (15.9 ± 8.3°) and flexed (12.2 ± 7.1°) relative to the trapezium, and significantly translated to the volar (0.8 ± 0.6 mm) and ulnar directions (0.9 ± 0.8 mm) with maximum pinch force. This movement consistently increased with the pinch force.
Conclusion
This study successfully employed 4D-CT to precisely demonstrate changes in rotation and translation at the trapeziometacarpal joint during pinch motion for various instantaneous forces.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions imposed by the Ethics Committee.
References
Marshall M, Van der Windt D, Nicholls E, Myers H, Dziedzic K. Radiographic thumb osteoarthritis: frequency, patterns, and associations with pain and clinical assessment findings in a community-dwelling population. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(4):735–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq371.
Cooney WP 3rd, Chao EY. Biomechanical analysis of static forces in the thumb during hand function. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197759010-00004.
Kawanishi Y, Oka K, Tanaka H, Okada K, Sugamoto K, Murase T. In vivo 3-dimensional kinematics of thumb carpometacarpal joint during thumb opposition. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(2):182.e1-182.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.07.028.
Su FC, Lin CJ, Wang CK, et al. In vivo analysis of trapeziometacarpal joint arthrokinematics during multi directional thumb motions. Clin Biomech. 2014;29(9):1009–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.012.
Crisco JJ, Halilaj E, Moore DC, Patel T, Weiss AP, Ladd AL. In vivo kinematics of the trapeziometacarpal joint during thumb extension-flexion and abduction-adduction. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):289–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.062.
Kuo LC, Lin CJ, Chen GP, et al. In vivo analysis of trapeziometacarpal joint kinematics during pinch tasks. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:157295. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/157295.
Halilaj E, Rainbow MJ, Got C, et al. In vivo kinematics of the thumb carpometacarpal joint during three isometric functional tasks. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(4):1114–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3063-y.
Goto A, Leng S, Sugamoto K, Cooney WP 3rd, Kakar S, Zhao K. In vivo pilot study evaluating the thumb carpometacarpal joint during circumduction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(4):1106–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3066-8.
de Roo MGA, Muurling M, Dobbe JGG, Brinkhorst ME, Streekstra GJ, Strackee SD. A four-dimensional-CT study of in vivo scapholunate rotation axes: possible implications for scapholunate ligament reconstruction. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019;44(5):479–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419830924.
Brinkhorst M, Foumani M, Rosmalen J, et al. Quantifying in vivo scaphoid, lunate, and capitate kinematics using four-dimensional computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50(2):351–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03543-4.
Rauch A, Arab WA, Dap F, Dautel G, Blum A, Gondim Teixeira PA. Four-dimensional CT analysis of wrist kinematics during radioulnar deviation. Radiology. 2018;289(3):750–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180640.
Matsumura N, Oki S, Fukasawa N, et al. Glenohumeral translation during active external rotation with the shoulder abducted in cases with glenohumeral instability: a 4-dimensional computed tomography analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(10):1903–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.008.
Oki S, Kaneda K, Yamada Y, et al. Four-dimensional CT analysis using sequential 3D-3D registration. J Vis Exp. 2019;(153). https://doi.org/10.3791/59857.
Wijesooriya K, Weiss E, Dill V, et al. Quantifying the accuracy of automated structure segmentation in 4D CT images using a deformable image registration algorithm. Med Phys. 2008;35(4):1251–60. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2839120.
Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, et al. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1882–9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01199.
Cooney WP 3rd, Lucca MJ, Chao EY, Linscheid RL. The kinesiology of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(9):1371–81. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198163090-00002.
Wu G, Van der Helm FC, Veeger HE, et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion–Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech. 2005;38(5):981–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042.
Cheze L, Dumas R, Comtet JJ, Rumelhart C, Fayet M. A joint coordinate system proposal for the study of the trapeziometacarpal joint kinematics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2009;12(3):277–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840802459404.
Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(3):91–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001.
Cerveri P, De Momi E, Marchente M, et al. Method for the estimation of a double hinge kinematic model for the trapeziometacarpal joint using MR imaging. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2010;13(3):387–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255840903260818.
Tang J, Zhang X, Li ZM. Operational and maximal workspace of the thumb. Ergonomics. 2008;51(7):1109–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130801958667.
Imaeda T, Niebur G, Cooney WP 3rd, Linscheid RL, An KN. Kinematics of the normal trapeziometacarpal joint. J Orthop Res. 1994;12(2):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100120208.
Hollister A, Buford WL, Myers LM, Giurintano DJ, Novick A. The axes of rotation of the thumb carpometacarpal joint. J Orthop Res. 1992;10(3):454–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100100319.
Moulton MJ, Parentis MA, Kelly MJ, Naidu SH, Pellegrini VD Jr. Influence of metacarpophalangeal joint position on basal joint-loading in the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(5):709–16. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200105000-00009.
Edmunds JO. Current concepts of the anatomy of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(1):170–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.10.029.
Wang KK, Zhang X, McCombe D, Ackland DC, Ek ET, Tham SK. Quantitative analysis of in-vivo thumb carpometacarpal joint kinematics using four-dimensional computed tomography. J Hand Surg Eur. 2018;43(10):1088–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418789828.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Taku Suzuki, MD, PhD, and Noboru Matsumura, MD, PhD, from the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, for their clinical advice. The authors would also like to thank the radiology technicians at Keio University Hospital for 4DCT scanning.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or nonprofit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Inaba, N., Oki, S., Nagura, T. et al. In-vivo kinematics of the trapeziometacarpal joint in dynamic pinch motion using four-dimensional computed tomography imaging. Skeletal Radiol 53, 129–140 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04387-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04387-4