Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing tophaceous spinal gout treatment response using dual-energy CT as a point-of-care imaging modality: case report

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a case of chronic tophaceous gout affecting the spine, hands, elbows, feet, and knees in a 67-year-old man with serum urate levels at 549 µmol/L whose response to treatment was successfully mapped using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). The patient presented with exacerbation of acute-on-chronic lumbar back pain. He had received a diagnosis of gout 3 years prior to this presentation yet was not on any urate-lowering therapy. The patient received febuxostat 80 mg and colchicine 0.3 mg once daily and underwent DECT to assess baseline monosodium urate (MSU) burden. At baseline, MSU deposits were seen in the hands, elbows, feet, knees, and lumbar spine including the left L5–S1 facet joint encroaching onto the neural foramen. After 2.5 years of treatment, serum urate level was within the target range (< 360 µmol/L), and the patient underwent a follow-up DECT that revealed almost full resolution of MSU deposition in the spine, including the MSU-burdened facet joint and neural foramen in the lumbar spine, in addition to all the affected peripheral joints. This case is the first report of radiological evidence of nearly complete resolution of MSU deposits in spinal gout on DECT after urate-lowering therapy treatment, which demonstrates the utility of this imaging modality as a non-invasive investigational point-of-care imaging modality for mapping treatment response and identifying the etiology of back pain in a patient with chronic tophaceous spinal gout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Authors can confirm that all relevant data are included in the article.

References

  1. Clebak KT, Morrison A, Croad JR. Gout: rapid evidence review. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102:533–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajan A, Aati O, Kalluru R, Gamble GD, Horne A, Doyle AJ, et al. Lack of change in urate deposition by dual-energy computed tomography among clinically stable patients with long-standing tophaceous gout: a prospective longitudinal study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bădulescu M, Macovei L, Rezuş E. Acute gout attack with normal serum uric acid levels. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2014;118:942–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jayakumar D, Sehra ST, Anand S, Stallings GW, Danve A. Role of dual energy computed tomography imaging in the diagnosis of gout. Cureus. 2017;9:e985.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdellatif W, Ding J, Khorshed D, Shojania K, Nicolaou S. Unravelling the mysteries of gout by multimodality imaging. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50:S17-23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Neogi T, Jansen TLTA, Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Schumacher HR, Berendsen D, et al. 2015 Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:1789–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicolaou S, Liang T, Murphy DT, Korzan JR, Ouellette H, Munk P. Dual-energy CT: a promising new technique for assessment of the musculoskeletal system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:S78-86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun Y, Chen H, Zhang Z, Ma L, Zhou J, Zhou Y, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for monitoring the effect of urate-lowering therapy in gouty arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015;18:880–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weaver JS, Vina ER, Munk PL, Klauser AS, Elifritz JM, Taljanovic MS. Gouty arthropathy: review of clinical manifestations and treatment, with emphasis on imaging. J Clin Med. 2021;11:166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalbeth N, Becce F, Botson JK, Zhao L, Kumar A. Dual-energy CT assessment of rapid monosodium urate depletion and bone erosion remodelling during pegloticase plus methotrexate co-therapy. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2022;61:4898–904.

  11. Araujo EG, Bayat S, Petsch C, Englbrecht M, Faustini F, Kleyer A, et al. Tophus resolution with pegloticase: a prospective dual-energy CT study. RMD Open. 2015;1:e000075.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Desai MA, Peterson JJ, Garner HW, Kransdorf MJ. Clinical utility of dual-energy CT for evaluation of tophaceous gout. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2011;31(5):1365–75.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bacani AK, McCollough CH, Glazebrook KN, Bond JR, Michet CJ, Milks J, et al. Dual energy computed tomography for quantification of tissue urate deposits in tophaceous gout: help from modern physics in the management of an ancient disease. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:235–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chowalloor PV, Siew TK, Keen HI. Imaging in gout: a review of the recent developments. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2014;6:131–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicolaou S, Yong-Hing CJ, Galea-Soler S, Hou DJ, Louis L, Munk P. Dual-energy CT as a potential new diagnostic tool in the management of gout in the acute setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1072–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu Z, Mao T, Xu Y, Li T, Wang Y, Gao F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47:1587–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, Strobl S, Gruber J, Feuchtner G, Bellmann-Weiler R, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography detection of cardiovascular monosodium urate deposits in patients with gout. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:1019–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, Dzyubak OP, Lieske JC, Jackson ME, et al. Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:1441–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu S, Li F, Xie X. Identification of gout in unusual sites by dual energy computed tomography. Ann Saudi Med. 2016;36:367–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Brahmbhatt P, Vibhute P, Gupta V, Murray J, Desai A, Agarwal A. Spinal gout diagnosed by dual-energy CT: a case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2022;17:4135–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng W, Sin CH, Wong CH, Chiu WF, Chung OM. Unusual presentation of spinal gout: 2 cases report and literature review. J Orthop Case Rep. 2017;7:50–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gong B, Shojania K, Khosa F, Nicolaou S. Referral Patterns for dual-energy computed tomography in diagnosis and management of gout: ten-year experience at a Canadian institution. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69:430–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Uhlig T, Eskild T, Karoliussen LF, Sexton J, Kvien TK, Haavardsholm EA, et al. Two-year reduction of dual-energy CT urate depositions during a treat-to-target strategy in gout in the NOR-Gout longitudinal study. Rheumatol. 2022;61:SI81-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu H, Xue J, Ye L, Zhou Q, Shi D, Xu R. The application of dual-energy computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute gouty arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:975–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Becker MA, Schumacher HR, Wortmann RL, MacDonald PA, Palo WA, Eustace D, et al. Febuxostat, a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase: a twenty-eight-day, multicenter, phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response clinical trial examining safety and efficacy in patients with gout. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:916–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi HK, Al-Arfaj AM, Eftekhari A, Munk PL, Shojania K, Reid G, et al. Dual energy computed tomography in tophaceous gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1609–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualization of this manuscript and to the content. Mohammadali Saffarzadeh and Dr. Syed M.A. Haydar took the lead in drafting the manuscript, analyzing figures, and providing radiological details of the included case. Dr. Kamran Shojania provided clinical correlation of the radiological findings and provided expertise and details on the medical management of the case. Dr. Hugue Ouellette, Dr. Savvas Nicolaou, and Dr. Nicolas Murray took a main part in refining the idea of the manuscript and were the senior radiologists. All authors provided input at every stage of development and approved the final draft and its submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammadali Saffarzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from the subject described in this report.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saffarzadeh, M., Haydar, S.M.A., Shojania, K. et al. Assessing tophaceous spinal gout treatment response using dual-energy CT as a point-of-care imaging modality: case report. Skeletal Radiol 52, 1599–1604 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04260-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04260-w

Keywords

Navigation