Skip to main content

Acro-osteolysis: imaging, differential diagnosis, and disposition review

Abstract   

Acro-osteolysis is the osseous destruction of the hand or foot distal phalanges. The categories of the disease include terminal tuft, midshaft, or mixed types. Recognition of acro-osteolysis is straightforward on radiographs, but providing an accurate differential diagnosis and appropriately recommending advanced imaging or invasive tissue diagnosis can be more elusive. A radiologist’s ability to provide advanced assessment can greatly aid clinicians in expedient diagnosis and management of the array of diseases presenting with acro-osteolysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4 
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. Botou A, Bangeas A, Alexiou I, Sakkas LI. Acro-osteolysis. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(1):9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kemp SS, Dalinka MK, Schumacher HR. Acro-osteolysis Etiologic and radiological considerations. JAMA. 1986;255(15):2058–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanikawa T, Okada Y, Azuma T, Fukushima A, Kawahara C, Tanaka Y. Adult-onset idiopathic progressive acro-osteolysis with proximal symphalangism. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(1):165–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Todd G, Saxe N. Idiopathic phalangeal osteolysis. Arch Dermatol. 1994;130(6):759–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Freire V, Bazeli R, Elhai M, et al. Hand and wrist involvement in systemic sclerosis: US features. Radiology. 2013;269:824–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rajiah P, Sundaram M, Subhas N. Dual-energy CT in musculoskeletal imaging: what is the role beyond gout? AJR. 2019;213(3):493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koutaissoff S, Vanthuyne M, Smith V, et al. Hand radiological damage in systemic sclerosis: comparison with a control group and clinical and functional correlations. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;40(5):455–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnstone EM, Hutchinson CE, Vail A, Chevance A, Herrick AL. Acro-osteolysis in systemic sclerosis is associated with digital ischaemia and severe calcinosis. Rheumatology. 2012;51(12):2234–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Braun-Moscovici Y, Furst DE, Markovits D, et al. Vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and acroosteolysis in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(11):2201–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shmerling RH, Stern SH, Gravallese EM, Kantrowitz FG. Tophaceous deposition in the finger pads without gouty arthritis. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148(8):1830–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carter JD, Kedar RP, Anderson SR, et al. An analysis of MRI and ultrasound imaging in patients with gout who have normal plain radiographs. Rheumatology. 2009;48:1442–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Girish G, Glazebrook KN, Jacobson JA. Advanced imaging in gout. AJR. 2013;201(3):515–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thiele RG, Schlesinger N. Diagnosis of gout by ultrasound. Rheumatology. 2007;46:1116–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barnes CL, Helms CA. MRI of Gout: A Pictorial Review. Int J Clin Rheumatol. 2012;7(3):281–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Destouet JM, Murphy WA. Guitar player acro-osteolysis. Skeletal Radiol. 1981;6(4):275–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller MN, Close JD. A unique incidental finding in two young dancers: a case series. Sports Health. 2015;7(5):421–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Millet JD, Brown RK, Levi B, et al. Frostbite: spectrum of imaging findings and guidelines for management. Radiographics. 2016;36(7):2154–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Golant A, Nord RM, Paksima N, Posner MA. Cold exposure injuries to the extremities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:704–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pineda C, Espinosa R, Pena A. Radiographic imaging in osteomyelitis: the role of plain radiography, computed tomography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and scintigraphy. Semin Plast Surg. 2009;23(2):80–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meek RD, Mills MK, Hanrahan CJ, et al. Pearls and pitfalls for soft-tissue and bone biopsies: a cross-institutional review. Radiographics. 2020;40(1):266–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwarz GS, Berenyi MR, Siegel MW. Atrophic arthropathy and diabetic neuritis. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1969;106(3):523–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rajakulasingam R, Azzopardi C, Murphy J, et al. Lesions of the distal phalanx: imaging overview. Indian J Musculoskelet Radiol. 2019;1(47):47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slim FJ, Faber WR, Maas M. The role of radiology in nerve function impairment and its musculoskeletal complications in leprosy. Lepr Rev. 2009;80(4):373–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jabeen S, Saini J, Vengalil S, et al. Neuroimaging in leprosy: the nerves and beyond. Radiol Infect Dis. 2020;7(1):12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jain S, Visser LH, Praveen TL, et al. High-resolution sonography: a new technique to detect nerve damage in leprosy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(8): e498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobson JA, Girish G, Jiang Y, Resnick D. Radiographic evaluation of arthritis: inflammatory conditions. Radiology. 2008;248(2):378–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakthiswary R, Naicker AS, Htwe O, Shahrir MS, Sazliyana SS. Severe psoriatic acroosteolysis in the absence of psoriatic arthropathy. BMJ Case Rep. 2011;2011:bcr0920114794.

  28. Bocci EB, Biscontini D, Olivieri I, Gerli R. Acro-osteolysis of the big toe in a patient with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(9):2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ory PA, Gladman DD, Mease PJ. Psoriatic arthritis and imaging. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 Suppl 2:ii55–7.

  30. Pope J. Raynaud’s phenomenon (primary). BMJ Clin Evid. 2013;2013:1119.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Connell DA, Koulouris G, Thorn DA, Potter HG. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the hand. Radiographics. 2002;22(3):583–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferreira IR, Domingues VS. Acro-osteolysis Lancet. 2012;380(9845):916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Smitaman E, Pereira BP, Huang BK, Zakhary MM, Fliszar E, Resnick DL. Abnormal bone marrow signal intensity in the phalanges of the foot as a manifestation of Raynaud phenomenon: a report of six patients. AJR. 2016;207(6):1252–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fardoun MM, Nassif J, Issa K, Baydoun E, Eid AH. Raynaud’s phenomenon: a brief review of the underlying mechanisms. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Baek HJ, Lee SJ, Cho KH, et al. Subungual tumors: clinicopathologic correlation with US and MR imaging findings. Radiographics. 2010;30(6):1621–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miller TT. Bone tumors and tumorlike conditions: analysis with conventional radiography. Radiology. 2008;246(3):662–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee HS, Joo KB, Song HT, et al. Relationship between sonographic and pathologic findings in epidermal inclusion cysts. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29(7):374–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Plate AM, Steiner G, Posner MA. Malignant tumors of the hand and wrist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(12):680–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Theodorou SJ, Theodorou DJ, Bona SJ, Farooki S. Primary squamous cell carcinoma: an incidental toe mass. AJR. 2005;184(3 Suppl):S110–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fornage BD. Glomus tumors in the fingers: diagnosis with US. Radiology. 1988;167(1):183–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Moschilla G, Breidahl W. Sonography of the finger. AJR. 2002;178(6):1451–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Harish S, Lee JC, Ahmad M, Saifuddin A. Soft tissue masses with “cyst-like” appearance on MR imaging: distinction of benign and malignant lesions. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(12):2652–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Theumann NH, Goettmann S, Le Viet D, et al. Recurrent glomus tumors of fingertips: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology. 2002;223(1):143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Baughman RP, Teirstein AS, Judson MA, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients in a case control study of sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:1885–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rubio-Rivas M, Franco J, Corbella X. Sarcoidosis presenting with and without Löfgren’s syndrome: clinical, radiological and behavioral differences observed in a group of 691 patients. Joint Bone Spine. 2020;87(2):141–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Glennås A, Kvien TK, Melby K, et al. Acute sarcoid arthritis: occurrence, seasonal onset, clinical features and outcome. Br J Rheumatol. 1995;34(1):45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sparks JA, McSparron JI, Shah N, et al. Osseous sarcoidosis: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes–experience from a large, academic hospital. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44(3):371–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Anakwenze OA, Kancherla V, Hatch M, Brooks JS, Ogilvie CM. Primary musculoskeletal sarcoidosis. Orthopedics. 2010;33(5):308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein AS. Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2153–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Moore SL, Teirstein AE. Musculoskeletal sarcoidosis: spectrum of appearances at MR imaging. Radiographics. 2003;23(6):1389–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Varki R, Sadowski S, Uitto J, Pfendner E. Epidermolysis bullosa. II. Type VII collagen mutations and phenotype-genotype correlations in the dystrophic subtypes. J Med Genet. 2007;44(3):181–92.

  52. Fine JD, Johnson LB, Weiner M, et al. Pseudosyndactyly and musculoskeletal contractures in inherited epidermolysis bullosa: experience of the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry, 1986–2002. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(1):14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. El Hachem M, Zambruno G, Bourdon-Lanoy E, et al. Multicentre consensus recommendations for skin care in inherited epidermolysis bullosa. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9(1):76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wilkie AO, Slaney SF, Oldridge M, et al. Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome. Nat Genet. 1995;9(2):165–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Cohen MM Jr, Kreiborg S. Hands and feet in the Apert syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1995;57(1):82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mantilla-Capacho JM, Arnaud L, Díaz-Rodriguez M, Barros-Núñez P. Apert syndrome with preaxial polydactyly showing the typical mutation Ser252Trp in the FGFR2 gene. Genet Couns. 2005;16(4):403–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Gray MJ, Kim CA, Bertola DR, et al. Serpentine fibula polycystic kidney syndrome is part of the phenotypic spectrum of Hajdu-Cheney syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(1):122–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zanotti S, Canalis E. Notch and the skeleton. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(4):886–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Nunziata V, di Giovanni G, Ballanti P, Bonucci E. High turnover osteoporosis in acro-osteolysis (Hajdu-Cheney syndrome). J Endocrinol Invest. 1990;13(3):251–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Brennan AM, Pauli RM. Hajdu-Cheney syndrome: evolution of phenotype and clinical problems. Am J Med Genet. 2001;100(4):292–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. McKiernan FE. Integrated anti-remodeling and anabolic therapy for the osteoporosis of Hajdu-Cheney syndrome: 2-year follow-up. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(3):379–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Ihde LL, Forrester DM, Gottsegen CJ, et al. Sclerosing bone dysplasias: review and differentiation from other causes of osteosclerosis. Radiographics. 2011;31(7):1865–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Muthukrishnan N, Shetty MV. Pycnodysostosis Report of a case. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1972;114(2):247–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Stephanie Bernard and Dr. Norman Arbelo-Cruz for their image contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All persons who meet authorship criteria are listed as authors, and all authors certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, writing, or revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher T. Bailey.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official views or policy of the Department of Defense or its Components.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bailey, C.T., Zelaya, R., Kayder, O.O. et al. Acro-osteolysis: imaging, differential diagnosis, and disposition review. Skeletal Radiol 52, 9–22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04145-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04145-y

Keywords

  • Acro-osteolysis
  • Osteolysis
  • Resorption
  • Phalanges