Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Percutaneous spine biopsy: reaching those hard-to-reach places

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

 Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death, with the spine being the most common site for skeletal metastasis. The spine is also a site for primary malignancy, such as sarcoma and chordoma, as well as non-neoplastic pathologies. An accurate diagnosis of spinal neoplastic diseases is crucial in determining appropriate management. With the advent of personalised oncology, the need to establish a definitive histopathologic diagnosis to guide management is more important than ever. Percutaneous biopsy has proven to be safe and efficient in establishing a reliable histopathologic diagnosis. The spine, however, can be a challenging site to biopsy, due to the proximity of critical neurovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal structures. Successful spine biopsy depends on several factors: suspected diagnosis, size of the lesion, location within the spine, modality for best imaging guidance, operator experience, technical equipment considerations, and desired approach and associated limitations. The specimen must also be obtained with a biopsy route amenable to any future surgical intervention, with surgical input often sought, frequently in a multidisciplinary setting, to confirm procedure-specific goals and expectations. Knowledge of the requisite local anatomy, procedural and patient-specific indications, and contraindications and various approaches that may be used to access different segments of the spine, potential complications, and how to address these are keys to a successful percutaneous spinal biopsy, even in the most challenging of circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris L, Rajashekar D, Sharma P, David KM. Performance of computed-tomography-guided spine biopsy for the diagnosis of malignancy and infection. Oper Neurosurg. 2021;21:126–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang SY, Oh E, Kwon JW, Kim HS. Percutaneous image-guided spinal lesion biopsies: factors affecting higher diagnostic yield. AJR. 2018;211:1068–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Filippiadis D, Moschovaki-Zeiger O, Kelekis A. Percutaneous bone and soft tissue biopsies: an illustrative approach. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;24(3):10077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rehm J, Veith S, Akbar M, Kauczor HU, Weber MA. CT-guided percutaneous spine biopsy in suspected infection or malignancy: a study of 214 patients. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2016;188:1156–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh DK, Kumar N, Nayak BK, et al. Approach-based techniques of CT-guided percutaneous vertebral biopsy. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020;26:143–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tehranzadeh J, Tao C, Browning CA. Percutaneous needle biopsy of the spine. Acta Radiol. 2007;8:860–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peh WCG. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of spinal lesions. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2006;2(3):e25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC, et al. Society of interventional radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions – Part II: Recommendations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30:1168–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu M, Xiao L, Liu H, et al. PET/CT-guided versus CT-guided percutaneous core biopsies in the diagnosis of bone tumors and tumor-like lesions: which is the better choice? Cancer Imaging. 2019;19:69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Aithala JP. Role of percutaneous image guided biopsy in spinal lesions: adequacy and correlation with MRI findings. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10(8):RC11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gul SB, Polat AV, Bekci T, Selcuk MB. Accuracy of percutaneous CT-guided spine biopsy and determinants of biopsy success. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2016;100(1): 62,pp1–7

  12. Mireles-Cano JN, Gonzalez AM, Garcia-Gonzalea OM, Perez RM. Effectiveness of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous vertebral biopsy. Rev Bras Ortop. 2021;56(4):453–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pierot L, Boulin A. Percutaneous biopsy of the thoracic and lumbar spine: transpedicular approach under fluoroscopic guidance. AJNR. 1999;20:23–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leschka AC, Drazenko B, El Shikh S, Wossmann C, Schumacher M, Taschner CA. C-arm cone beam computed tomography needle path overlay for image-guided procedures of the spine and pelvis. Neuroradiology. 2012;54:215–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rimondi E, Staals EL, Errani C, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of the spine: results of 430 biopsies. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:975–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lis E, Bilsky MH, Pisinski L, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of osseous lesion of the spine in patients with known or suspected malignancy. AJNR. 2004;25:1583–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF. CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology. 1999;212(3):673–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu M, Sequeiros RB, Xu Y, He X. MRI-guided percutaneous transpedicular biopsy of thoracic and lumbar spine using a 0.23T scanner with optical instrument tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42:1740–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nourbakhsh A, Hanson ZC. Percutaneous spine biopsy: a review of the current literature. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(14):e681–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yaffe D, Greenberg G, Leitner J, Gipstein R, Shapiro M, Bachar GN. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of thoracic and lumbar spine: a new coaxial technique. AJNR. 2003;24:2111–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kattapuram SV, Khurana JS, Rosenthal DI. Percutaneous needle biopsy of the spine. Spine. 1992;17(5):561–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nourbakhsh A, Grady JJ, Garges K. Percutaneous spine biopsy: a meta-analysis. JBJS. 2008;90:1722–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wallace A, Pacheco RA, Vyhmeister R, Tomasian A, Chang RO, Jennings JW. Fluoroscopy-guided intervertebral disc biopsy with a coaxial drill system. Skeletal Radiol. 2016;45:273–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brugieres P, Gaston A, Heran F, et al. Percutaneous biopsies of the thoracic spine under CT guidance: transcostovertebral approach. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990;14:446–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heran MKS, Legiehn GM, Munk PL. Current concepts and techniques in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2006;37:409–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sucu HK, Bezircioglu H, Cicek C, Ersahin Y. Computerized tomography – guided percutaneous transforaminodiscal biopsy sampling of vertebral body lesions. J Neurosurg (Spine1). 2003;99:51–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nourbakhsh A. Percutaneous spine biopsy: a literature review. Int J Rad Rad Onc. 2015;1(1):023–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miranda MO, Moser TP. A practical guide for planning pelvic bone percutaneous interventions (biopsy, tumour ablation and cementoplasty). Insights Imaging. 2018;9:275–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Visser H, Motsitsi N. Percutaneous trans ilio-sacral biopsy of the spine in sacral tuberculosis. Int J Orth Surg. 2007;8(1):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W 12th Ave., Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1E9, Canada

    Mayuran Saththianathan, Paul Ian Mallinson, Peter Loren Munk & Manraj Kanwal Singh Heran

Authors
  1. Mayuran Saththianathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Ian Mallinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Loren Munk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manraj Kanwal Singh Heran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manraj Kanwal Singh Heran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saththianathan, M., Mallinson, P.I., Munk, P.L. et al. Percutaneous spine biopsy: reaching those hard-to-reach places. Skeletal Radiol 52, 1803–1814 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04120-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04120-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation