Is the immediate effect of marathon running on novice runners’ knee joints sustained within 6 months after the run? A follow-up 3.0 T MRI study



To evaluate changes in the knee joints of asymptomatic first-time marathon runners, using 3.0 T MRI, 6 months after finishing marathon training and run.

Materials and methods

Six months after their participation in a baseline study regarding their knee joints, 44 asymptomatic novice marathoners (17 males, 27 females, mean age 46 years old) agreed to participate in a repeat MRI investigation: 37 completed both a standardized 4-month-long training programme and the marathon (marathon runners); and 7 dropped out during training (pre-race dropouts). The participants already underwent bilateral 3.0 T MRIs: 6 months before and 2 weeks after their first marathon, the London Marathon 2017. This study was a follow-up assessment of their knee joints. Each knee structure was assessed using validated scoring/grading systems at all time points.


Two weeks after the marathon, 3 pre-marathon bone marrow lesions and 2 cartilage lesions showed decrease in radiological score on MRI, and the improvement was sustained at the 6-month follow-up. New improvements were observed on MRI at follow-up: 5 pre-existing bone marrow lesions and 3 cartilage lesions that remained unchanged immediately after the marathon reduced in their extent 6 months later.

No further lesions appeared at follow-up, and the 2-week post-marathon lesions showed signs of reversibility: 10 of 18 bone marrow oedema-like signals and 3 of 21 cartilage lesions decreased on MRI.


The knees of novice runners achieved sustained improvement, for at least 6 months post-marathon, in the condition of their bone marrow and articular cartilage.


So far, previous studies have only found few subtle short-term abnormalities, i.e. non-acute lesions, of low grade of severity; on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the knees of regular long-distance runners (minutes to few weeks after the marathon); this was where no significant pre-existing injuries were reported in the first place [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Limited peer-reviewed data on the impact of marathon running over a longer period of time (medium-term, 2–3-month follow-up; long-term, one study 10-year follow-up) has shown that any immediate post-marathon alterations in MRI signal return to baseline in runners within 3 months [5,6,7,8]. All follow-up studies up to this point were conducted with a very small population of regular long-distance runners (up to 13 participants; one knee scanned only) [5,6,7,8,9], and none studied the incidence and status of running-related lesions over time in novice runners participating in their first marathon.

To better understand the implications of long-distance running for the knees of novice runners, we aimed to evaluate changes in the knee joints of first-time marathon runners using 3.0 T MRI 6 months after finishing marathon training and run.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

The study received ethical approval by the UK National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee and informed consent was obtained from all participants. The volunteers were recruited from the group of runners who were successful in the ballot for the Virgin Money London Marathon 2017. Virgin sent emails to all successful marathon entrants and then a call centre was organized to recruit eligible volunteers for the study.

Only those who had participated in the previous study (study 1 [10]) were included in the follow-up investigation (study 2). Forty-four out of the previous cohort of 82 participants returned for study 2. The reasons for dropping out were not linked to their knee condition but to issues of availability to attend the specific MRI scanning days, i.e. the participants were located across the country.

This was a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of 44 healthy asymptomatic volunteers (17 males, 27 females, median age: 45 years), specifically novice runners who signed up for their first marathon. The main inclusion criteria were as follows: volunteers with no previous running experience and physically inactive before the training for their first marathon, i.e. not meeting physical activity requirements of 30 min of moderate-intensity physical activity, 5 days/week, or 20 min of more intense physical activities, 3 days/week, based on existing health recommendations [11,12,13]; with no present/previous knee injuries or cardiac abnormalities and no contraindications for undergoing MRI. Exclusion criteria included the following: pregnant women, regular long-distance runners, experienced marathon runners, aged < 18 years, with body mass index (BMI) > 30 OR < 18, with known knee problems, previous knee surgeries or poor cardiovascular health. The participants completed The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire [14] to ensure good joint function and no symptoms of knee injury.

All participants took part in a standardized 4-month beginner training plan for the marathon developed by Virgin London Marathon (with gradual increase in mileage, freely accessible online). Out of these 44 participants, 37 completed both the training for/and the marathon run (marathon runners), and 7 dropped-out during training (pre-race dropouts) and did not run the marathon, due to various reasons not linked directly to their pre-training health status: bradycardia (n = 1), bronchitis (n = 1), calf issue (n = 1), and personal (n = 4) (see Table 1 for participant characteristics).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants. BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation

Magnetic resonance imaging

The 44 participants were assessed at all 3 time points: (1) 6 months before the race (and therefore before the training programme; MRI 1), (2) 2 weeks after running the marathon (and post-training; MRI 2), and (3) approximately 6 months later (MRI 3). Both marathon runners and pre-race dropouts were scanned at the same 3 time points. Both knees of all participants were scanned and analyzed independently (88 knee MRI scans). At each time point, measurements were performed with the same 3.0 T MR scanner (Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and dedicated 15 channel knee coil for the analysis, and identical parameters of the MRI unit were used in order to achieve optimal comparability. The imaging protocol included proton density–weighted fat suppressed (PD FS) sequences in axial (repetition time msec/echo time in msec; 4630/37), sagittal (4200/41 msec) and coronal planes (5240/41 msec). All slices were 3 mm thick, with an image size/acquisition matrix of 320 × 320 pixels. The total acquisition time per bilateral scan was 25 min and average field of view was 16 cm.

The participants were asked to complete KOOS questionnaires on each MRI scanning day to assess their perceived knee condition including symptoms of functional limitation.

Radiological reporting

The assessment of all the MRI data was made by a musculoskeletal radiologist with 10-year experience at consultant level (264 MRI scans, 88 knees × 3 time points). The images from half of the cohort (randomly selected participants) were also evaluated independently by a second fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist with 9-year experience at consultant level. Images of each time point were analyzed separately.

Validated scoring/grading systems [15,16,17,18,19,20] were used to evaluate the MRI findings. Any signal changes/lesions of various grades of severity were quantified for the following knee structures: meniscus [15, 16], cartilage [17], bone marrow [18], tendons [19] and ligaments [16]. All structural subdivisions were assessed. The presence of other findings was specified [20, 21]. All abnormalities were recorded including grade 1 abnormalities (all scores/grades different from 0 will be defined as ‘lesions’ throughout the text). The main three knee compartments (larger units) include the following: patellofemoral joint; lateral tibiofemoral joint; medial tibiofemoral joint. Full details are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Knee scoring/grading systems. BLOKS, Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Score; ACLOAS, Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score; KOSS, Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System; MOAKS, MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score; WORMS, Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score

In case of discrepancies between the radiologists’ reports concerning the findings, agreement (consensus scores) was achieved with a consensus reading in a second MRI reporting session.

Statistical analysis

Both knees of the same participant were examined and each knee was treated independently in the statistical analysis. Unpaired t test was used to assess any significant differences between the two groups (marathon runners versus pre-race dropouts) with regard to age, BMI and height. Chi-square test was used for comparison of gender differences between the two groups, and of differences between the prevalence of lesions in these groups between MRI 1 and MRI 2, and between MRI 2 and MRI 3, respectively. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test and paired t test were used to assess significant differences between the KOOS results recorded at different time points. Statistical significance for analysis was defined as p < 0.05 (GraphPad Prism, version 6.0c).


Participant characteristics

There were no significant differences between the two groups of volunteers (marathon runners and pre-race dropouts) with regard to age (p = 0.922), BMI at the beginning of the study (p = 0.238), height (0.060) and gender (0.273).

All marathon runners completed the marathon and the mean finishing time was 5 h 18 min. The physical activity varied among participants in the period of time leading to the 6-month follow-up: marathon runners (mean 3 h/week [0–10]); pre-race dropouts (mean: 2 h/week [0–7]).

No significant differences were found between marathon runners and pre-race dropouts in terms of the prevalence and types of changes between MRI scans, in each of the assessed knee structures (p > 0.005). No associations could be made between the participants with sustained lesions at follow-up and other known participant characteristics. There were no significant differences in the participants’ symptoms/perceived knee condition (KOOS scores) over time, throughout the MRI scanning sessions (p > 0.05).


Improvement of pre-marathon cartilage lesions

Two pre-marathon cartilage lesions improved in severity grade (2 runners) from MRI 1 to MRI 2: one in the patellofemoral compartment and one in the tibiofemoral one. The improvement was sustained in both cases at MRI 3 (Table 3).

Table 3 Prevalence and types of improved pre-marathon lesions at MRI 2, with sustained improvement at MRI 3 (by score/grade of severity), in the cartilage and bone marrow. ‘Improvement’ was defined as reduction in the extent of lesion (score/grade) between MRI scans. The scoring systems were defined in Table 2. BME, bone marrow oedema

Six months post-marathon, new improvements in the patellofemoral compartment were seen in 2 runners: 3 pre-marathon lesions which were unchanged from MRI 1 to MRI 2 showed improved state at MRI 3. Similarly, in the pre-race dropouts’ group, 3 pre-marathon lesions (in 2 people) improved at MRI 3 (Table 4).

Table 4 Prevalence and types of newly improved pre-marathon lesions at MRI 3 (by score/grade of severity), in the cartilage and bone marrow. ‘Improvement’ was defined as reduction in the extent of lesion (score/grade) between MRI scans. The scoring systems were defined in Table 2. BME, bone marrow oedema

No further lesions appeared at the 6-month follow-up.

Reversibility of post-marathon cartilage lesions

Twenty-one cartilage lesions were found in 13 marathon runners at MRI 2, out of which 13 were new lesions and 8 progressed in extent from the pre-existing lesions at MRI 1; the majority were located in the patellofemoral compartment (17/21; 81%—half were new). Only 4 lesions were observed in the pre-race dropouts’ group (3 participants), mostly in the patellofemoral compartment (3/4; 75%). These lesions were not new but progressed from MRI 1 to MRI 2.

In the marathon group, 3/21 (14%) cartilage lesions reversed over time, returning to baseline grading status at MRI 3 (Fig. 1; Table 5).

Fig. 1

Axial proton-density fat-saturated MR images of two different knees with changes in the extent of chondral lesions of the patella: A) resolution at 6-month follow-up (MRI 3) of a lesion that previously developed from the pre-marathon scan to the 2 weeks post-marathon scan (MRI 1 to MRI 2), in the right knee of a 67-year-old woman; B) smaller lesion at MRI 3 in comparison to MRI 2. The extent of lesion falls within the same grade parameters; however, it is slightly smaller showing signs of reversibility, in the right knee of a 51-year-old woman. Cartilage abnormalities are indicated by arrows and the lesion grade (G) is included in the left bottom corner and is defined in the modified Noyes scoring system [17] (see Table 2)

Table 5 Prevalence and types of reversible lesions (by score/grade of severity) from MRI 1 through to MRI 2 to MRI 3, in the cartilage and bone marrow. ‘Reversibility’ was defined as resolution/reduction in the extent of those lesions that appeared/progressed at MRI 2 from MRI 1, and then reversed or showed signs of reduction back to MRI 1 grade/score at MRI 3. The scoring systems were defined in Table 2. BME, bone marrow oedema

Bone marrow

Improvement of pre-marathon oedema-like signal

Three cases of pre-marathon bone marrow oedema-like signal showed improved condition (reduction in extent) in 2 runners at MRI 2. The improvement was sustained at MRI 3, so it did not reverse back to MRI 1 condition (Fig. 2a). One pre-race dropout also showed improvement of pre-marathon oedema at MRI 2 and this was maintained at MRI 3. All these were seen in the tibiofemoral knee compartment (Table 3).

Fig. 2

Coronal and axial proton-density fat-saturated MR images of two different knees with changes in the extent of subchondral bone marrow oedema-like signal: A) sustained improvement at 6-month follow-up (MRI 3) of a previous pre-marathon lesion (MRI 1) that reduced in extent 2 weeks after the marathon (MRI 2), in the femur of the left knee of a 54-year-old man; B) new improvement at MRI 3 in a pre-marathon lesion that remained unchanged from MRI 1 to MRI 2, in the patella of the right knee of a 48-year-old woman. Bone marrow oedema-like signal is indicated by arrows and the lesion grade (G) is included in the left bottom corner and is defined in the KOSS scoring system [18] (see Table 2); KOSS, Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System

At MRI 3, new improvements were identified in the patellofemoral compartment in 4 runners: 4 pre-marathon lesions which were maintained from MRI 1 to MRI 2 reduced in extent at MRI 3 (Fig. 2b); and another one that improved was in the tibiofemoral compartment (Table 4).

No further lesions appeared at the 6-month follow-up.

Reversibility of post-marathon oedema-like signal

Eighteen bone marrow oedema-like signals were identified in 10 marathon runners at MRI 2: 16 were new and 2 worsened from MRI 1, with the patellofemoral compartment being most affected (15/18; 83%—13 were new lesions). There were 3 new lesions in the pre-race dropouts’ group (2 participants), all in the patellofemoral compartment.

Six months later, 10/18 (56%) bone marrow lesions showed reversibility over time, with 8 of them returning to the pre-marathon state (Fig. 3; Table 5). In the pre-race dropouts’ group, 1/3 (33%) lesions discovered at MRI 2 showed reversibility.

Fig. 3

Axial proton-density fat-saturated MR images of two different knees that showed reversibility at 6-month follow-up (MRI 3) in the extent of subchondral bone marrow oedema-like signal of the patella that previously developed from the pre-marathon scan to the 2 weeks post-marathon scan (MRI 1 to MRI 2): A) reversibility but not to the MRI 1 grading status, in the right knee of a 31-year old woman; B) complete resolution to the MRI 1 grading status, in the left knee of a 34-year-old woman. Bone marrow oedema-like signal is indicated by arrows and the lesion grade (G) is included in the left bottom corner and is defined in the KOSS scoring system [18] (see Table 2); KOSS, Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System

Other findings

Four cases of semimembranosus tendon signal hyperintensity were seen at MRI 2 and one of them showed reversibility at MRI 3. Two ligamentous lesions were discovered in 2 marathon runners at MRI 2 and both reversed at MRI 3. No further development of other lesions was observed.


Our study demonstrated that both the training for/and the marathon run may be linked with sustained improvement/regression of pre-marathon bone marrow oedema-like signal and cartilage lesions in novice runners within 6 months after the run. No further lesion acquisition was observed at follow-up, and the few immediate post-marathon lesions showed signs of reversibility. There were no significant differences between marathon runners and pre-race dropouts in terms of results, suggesting that MRI changes may not be attributed to the marathon run alone but to the training as well. This is the first study to show sustained beneficial effect of marathon running on MRI at a 6-month follow-up.

The data adds to the existing literature for the following reasons: (1) the study is the largest to date to assess the effect of marathon running over time using 3.0 T MRI, with the longest medium-term follow-up. Previous MRI studies involved ≤ 13 runners, follow-ups of up to 3 months and none suggested permanent running-related damage or any sustained beneficial effect on knees [5,6,7,8]; (2) our cohort included first-time marathoners, with no running experience before the marathon training, whereas the runners in previous studies had long-distance running experience; (3) the impact of both the training for and the marathon run was assessed, while most previous work studied the knee joints shortly before and after the marathon day, not before training.

We acknowledge the following study limitations: (1) the activity levels of all participants at the beginning of the study and at follow-up were self-reported. The participants could have varied their activity levels and this might have affected the recovery of some lesions more than others; (2) non-runner controls were not involved; however, we included the dropouts from training who did not run the marathon in our analysis; (3) the exact times of dropping out from training by pre-race dropouts were unavailable and could not be commented on; (3) longer term follow-up studies are still needed to clarify the fate of improved lesions in relation to participant characteristics over time, as well as whether complete resolution of remaining lesions occurs later on.

The sustained beneficial effect of running on knees at 6 months after the marathon implies that running may help in reducing the chances of osteoarthritis in the long term. Few other (non-MRI) studies suggested running may protect the knee joint from osteoarthritis [22,23,24,25]. Any remaining bone marrow oedema-like signal appearing post-marathon is expected to resolve within 2 years [16, 26,27,28,29,30]. The cartilage may be able to adapt to loads caused by repeated loading during running but recovery time may vary [3, 31].

In conclusion, the knees of first-time marathoners achieved sustained improvement, for at least 6 months post-marathon, in the condition of the bone marrow and articular cartilage.


  1. 1.

    Hohmann E, Wortler K, Imhoff AB. MR imaging of the hip and knee before and after Marathon running. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:55–9.

  2. 2.

    Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schueller G, Uffmann M, Bader TR. Does marathon running cause acute lesions of the knee? Evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2179–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kessler MA, Glaser C, Tittel S, Reiser M, Imhoff AB. Recovery of the menisci and articular cartilage of runners after cessation of exercise: additional aspects of in vivo investigation based on 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:966–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Stahl R, Luke A, Ma CB, Krug R, Steinbach L, Majumdar S, et al. Prevalence of pathologic findings in asymptomatic knees of marathon runners before and after a competition in comparison with physically active subjects - a 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging study. Skelet Radiol. 2008;37:627–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Luke AC, Stehling C, Stahl R, Xiaojuan L, Kay T, Takamoto S, et al. High-field magnetic resonance imaging assessment of articular cartilage before and after marathon running: does long-distance running lead to cartilage damage? Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stehling C, Luke A, Stahl R, Baum T, Joseph G, Pan J, et al. Meniscal T1rho and T2 measured with 3.0T MRI increases directly after running a marathon. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:725–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Krampla W, Mayrhofer R, Malcher J, Kristen KH, Urban M, Hruby W. MR imaging of the knee in marathon runners before and after competition. Skelet Radiol. 2001;30:72–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hesper T, Miese FR, Hosalkar HS, Behringer M, Zilkens C, Antoch G, et al. Quantitative T2∗ assessment of knee joint cartilage after running a marathon. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:284–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Krampla WW, Newrkla SP, Kroener AH, Hruby WF. Changes on magnetic resonance tomography in the knee joints of marathon runners: a 10-year longitudinal study. Skelet Radiol. 2008;37:619–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Horga LM, Henckel J, Fotiadou A, et al. Can marathon running improve knee damage of middle-aged adults? A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine 2019;5:e000586.

  11. 11.

    Haskell WL, Lee I-M, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1423–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva World Heal Organ. 2010;

  13. 13.

    Knight JA. Physical inactivity: associated diseases and disorders. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2012.

  14. 14.

    Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003.

  15. 15.

    Hunter DJ, Lo GH, Gale D, Grainger AJ, Guermazi A, Conaghan PG. The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston-Leeds osteoarthritis knee score). Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:206–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Roemer FW, Frobell R, Lohmander LS, Niu J, Guermazi A. Anterior cruciate ligament osteoarthritis score (ACLOAS): longitudinal MRI-based whole joint assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014;22:668–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobek GH. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology. 1996;198:209–12.

  18. 18.

    Kornaat PR, Ceulemans RYT, Kroon HM, Riyazi N, Kloppenburg M, Carter WO, et al. MRI assessment of knee osteoarthritis: knee osteoarthritis scoring system (KOSS) - inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of a compartment-based scoring system. Skelet Radiol. 2005;34:95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Johnson DP, Wakeley CJ, Watt I. Magnetic resonance imaging of patellar tendonitis. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B. 1996.

  20. 20.

    Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Lo GH, Grainger AJ, Conaghan PG, Boudreau RM, et al. Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI osteoarthritis knee score). Osteoarthr Cartil. 2011;19:990–1002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S, Tirman PFJ, Miaux Y, White D, et al. Whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2004;12:177–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lo GH, Driban JB, Kriska A, Storki K, McAlindon TE, Souza R, et al. Habitual running any time in life is not detrimental and may be protective of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014.

  23. 23.

    Lane NE, Michel B, Bjorkengren A, Oehlert J, Shi H, Bloch DA, et al. The risk of osteoarthritis with running and aging: a 5-year longitudinal study. J Rheumatol. 1993.

  24. 24.

    Cymet TC, Sinkov V. Does long-distance running cause osteoarthritis? J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006.

  25. 25.

    Sohn RS, Micheli LJ. The effect of running on the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the hips and knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985.

  26. 26.

    Mandalia V, Henson JHL. Traumatic bone bruising-a review article. Eur J Radiol. 2008.

  27. 27.

    Lin E. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: clinical significance of common findings. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2010.

  28. 28.

    Boks SS, Vroegindeweij D, Koes BW, RMD B, MGM H, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA. MRI follow-up of posttraumatic bone bruises of the knee in general practice. Am J Roentgenol. 2007.

  29. 29.

    Bretlau T, Tuxøe J, Larsen L, Jørgensen U, Thomsen HS, Lausten GS. Bone bruise in the acutely injured knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002.

  30. 30.

    Miller MD, Osborne JR, Gordon WT, Hinkin DT, Brinker MR. The natural history of bone bruises. A prospective study of magnetic resonance imaging-detected trabecular microfractures in patients with isolated medial collateral ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1998.

  31. 31.

    Hinterwimmer S, Feucht MJ, Steinbrech C, Graichen H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R. The effect of a six-month training program followed by a marathon run on knee joint cartilage volume and thickness in marathon beginners. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:1353–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge Tim Hardman for his contribution in reviewing the manuscript. We thank all the study participants who allowed their clinical details to be used for research and educational purposes. We also thank the investigators and institutions: University College London, the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, St George’s University Hospitals, Barts Health NHS Trust, the London Implant Retrieval Centre; for their involvement in the research.


This research study was funded by patient donations and supported by researchers at the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. The authors are also grateful to The Maurice Hatter Foundation, the RNOH Charity and the Rosetrees Trust for their support.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Maria Horga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

The study was approved by NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC Reference Number 15/LO/0086). All participants gave informed consent before taking part.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horga, L.M., Henckel, J., Fotiadou, A. et al. Is the immediate effect of marathon running on novice runners’ knee joints sustained within 6 months after the run? A follow-up 3.0 T MRI study. Skeletal Radiol 49, 1221–1229 (2020).

Download citation


  • Marathon running
  • Knee
  • MRI
  • Bone
  • Cartilage