Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The incidence of skip metastases on whole bone MRI in high-grade bone sarcomas

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Skip metastases have been described with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and rarely chondrosarcoma. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of skip metastases on whole bone MRI in all primary high-grade sarcomas of the major long bones.

Materials and method

Retrospective review of patients from April 2007 to April 2019 with high-grade primary bone sarcomas of the humerus, radius, ulna, femur, tibia or fibula who had whole bone MRI at initial staging. Data collected included age, sex, tumour type, presence and location of skip metastases based on whole bone MRI and presence of distant metastases (the skeleton and lung).

Results

The study included 216 males and 171 females with mean age 30.6 years (range 4–92 years). Tumour types were as follows: High-grade osteosarcoma n = 202, Ewing sarcoma n = 68, high-grade chondrosarcoma n = 44, dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma n = 37, high-grade spindle cell sarcoma n = 29 and angiosarcoma n = 7. Skip lesions were identified in 63 (16.3%). However, after taking into account the presence of distant skeletal (n = 11) and pulmonary (n = 33) metastases, the overall incidence of skip metastases was 6.5%, occurring in 15 (7.5%) high-grade osteosarcomas, 3 (4.5%) Ewing sarcoma, 1 (2.8%) high-grade chondrosarcoma, 4 (10.8%) dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas, and 2 (6.9%) high-grade spindle cell sarcomas. A false positive MRI diagnosis of skip metastasis was made in 4 cases, 3 enchondromata and one focal nodular marrow hyperplasia.

Conclusion

The current study has documented the incidence of skip metastases in common types of high-grade primary bone sarcoma. The possibility of false positive skip metastases has also been highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Enneking WF, Kagan A. The implications of "skip" metastases in osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;111:33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Enneking WF, Kagan A. “Skip” metastases in osteosarcoma. Cancer. 1975;36(6):2192–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wuisman P, Enneking WF. Prognosis for patients who have osteosarcoma with skip metastasis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(1):60–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sajadi KR, Heck RK, Neel MD, Rao BN, Daw N, Rodriguez-Galindo C, et al. The incidence and prognosis of osteosarcoma skip metastases. Clin Orthop. 2004;426:92–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kager L, Zoubek A, Kastner U, Kempf-Bielack B, Potratz J, Kotz R, et al. Skip metastases in osteosarcoma: experience of the cooperative osteosarcoma study group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(10):1535–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies AM, Makwana NK, Grimer RJ, Carter SR. Skip metastases in Ewing's sarcoma: a report of three cases. Skelet Radiol. 1997;26(6):379–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiya TU, Wuisman PI. Long-term follow-up of 15 patients with non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma and a skip lesion. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(6):899–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Damron TA, Sim FH, Unni KK. Multicentric chondrosarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;328:211–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chow LT, Ng AW, Wong SK. Focal nodular and diffuse haematopoietic marrow hyperplasia in patients with underlying malignancies: a radiological mimic of malignancy in need of recognition. Clin Radiol. 2017;72(3):265.e7–265.e23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brenner W, Bohuslavizki KH, Eary JF. PET imaging of osteosarcoma. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(6):930–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurley C, McCarville MB, Shulkin BL, et al. Comparison of (18) F-FDG-PET-CT and bone scintigraphy for evaluation of osseous metastases in newly diagnosed and recurrent osteosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(8):1381–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Saifuddin A, Sharif B, Gerrand C, Whelan J. The current status of MRI in the pre-operative assessment of intramedullary conventional appendicular osteosarcoma. Skelet Radiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3079-1.

  13. Nascimento D, Suchard G, Hatem M, de Abreu A. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tumours and tumour-like lesions. Insights Imaging. 2014;5(4):419–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0339-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Staals EL, Bacchini P, Bertoni F. Dedifferentiated central chondrosarcoma. Cancer. 2006;106(12):2682–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimer RJ, Gosheger G, Taminiau A, et al. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: prognostic factors and outcome from a European group. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(14):2060–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Strotman PK, Reif TJ, Kliethermes SA, Sandhu JK, Nystrom LM. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: a survival analysis of 159 cases from the SEER database (2001-2011). J Surg Oncol. 2017;116(2):252–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu C, Xi Y, Li M, Jiao Q, Zhang H, Yang Q, et al. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: radiological features, prognostic factors and survival statistics in 23 patients. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173665eCollection 2017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pakos EE, Grimer RJ, Peake D, et al. The 'other' bone sarcomas: prognostic factors and outcomes of spindle cell sarcomas of bone. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2011;93(9):1271–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.27166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Palmerini E, Maki RG, Staals EL, et al. Primary angiosarcoma of bone: a retrospective analysis of 60 patients from 2 institutions. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014;37(6):528–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0b013e31827defal.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Thariat J, Peyrottes I, Chibon F, et al. Primary multicentric angiosarcoma of bone: true entity or metastases from an unknown primary? Value of comparative genomic hybridisation on paraffin embedded tissues. Rare Tumours. 2013;5:e53.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walden MJ, Murphey MD, Vidal JA. Incidental enchondromas of the knee. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(6):1611–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hong ED, Carrino JA, Weber KL, Fayad LM. Prevalence of shoulder enchondromas on routine MR imaging. Clin Imaging. 2011;35(5):378–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pui M, Tan M, Kuan J, Pho R. Haematopoietic marrow hyperplasia simulating transarticular skip metastasis in osteosarcoma. Australas Radiol. 1995;39:303–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. van Vucht N, Santiago R, Lottmann B, et al. The Dixon technique for MRI of the bone marrow. Skelet Radiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03271-4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ban Sharif.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saifuddin, A., Sharif, B., Oliveira, I. et al. The incidence of skip metastases on whole bone MRI in high-grade bone sarcomas. Skeletal Radiol 49, 945–954 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03369-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03369-9

Keywords

Navigation