Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiographic signs of hook of hamate fracture: evaluation of diagnostic utility

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Hook of hamate fracture, the most common swing-related wrist fracture, is commonly seen in high-level athletes. The fracture is rarely diagnosed on routine wrist radiographs, thus generally requiring CT or MR for diagnosis. Surgical excision has a high success rate, however diagnostic delay contributes to a high complication rate. Radiographic signs of hook of hamate fracture have been published, but uncertainty of the diagnostic accuracy limits application. The purpose of this study is to determine accuracy and interobserver reliability of radiographic signs of hook of hamate.

Materials and methods

This retrospective case-control study evaluated wrist radiographs of 50 patients, including 24 positive and 26 negative, for hook of hamate fracture, each proven by CT or MR. Five reviewers performed blinded, randomized evaluation of radiographs documenting whether the hook of hamate was normal or fractured, and if fractured, the radiographic signs present (ring sign, ghostly shadow, and diffuse sclerosis) and views that contributed to diagnosis.

Results

Radiographic signs demonstrated high sensitivity (85%; 95% CI: 77–91), specificity (92%; 95% CI: 86–96), and accuracy (89%; 95% CI: 84–92) with substantial interobserver reliability (k = 0.652). The ring sign was the most sensitive radiographic sign. Diagnosis was most often supported by the oblique view (38%) and rarely the lateral view (15%).

Conclusions

Radiographic signs of hook of hamate fracture on routine radiographs can accurately and reliably diagnose hook of hamate fractures. Evaluation for discontinuity of the cortical ring will optimize sensitivity, allowing for timely diagnosis and treatment, and a reduction of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mesgarzadeh M, Schneck CD, Bonakdarpour A. Carpal tunnel: MR imaging. Part I. Normal anatomy. Radiology. 1989;171(3):743–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eathorne SW. The wrist: clinical anatomy and physical examination—an update. Primary Care. 2005;32(1):17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Urch EY, Lee SK. Carpal fractures other than scaphoid. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34(1):51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Suh N, Ek ET, Wolfe SW. Carpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(4):785–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Helms CA. Fundamentals of skeletal radiology. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.

  6. Bishop AT, Beckenbaugh RD. Fracture of the hamate hook. J Hand Surg. 1988;13.1:135–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stark HH, Jobe FW, Boyes JH, Ashworth CR. Fracture of the hook of the hamate in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59(5):575–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aldridge JM, Mallon WJ. Hook of the hamate fractures in competitive golfers: results of treatment by excision of the fractured hook of the hamate. Orthopedics. 2003;26(7):717–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Murray PM, Cooney WP. Golf-induced injuries of the wrist. Clin Sports Med. 1996;15(1):85–109.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker RD, Berkowitz MS, Brahms MA, Bohl WR. Hook of the hamate fractures in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14(6):517–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roach JJ. Compound incomplete dislocation of the trapezium and compound fractured hamate hook. J Natl Med Assoc. 1978;70(11):841.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Foucher G, Schuind F, Merle M, Brunelli F. Fractures of the hook of the hamate. J Hand Surg. 1985;10(2):205–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. David TS, Zemel NP, Mathews PV. Symptomatic, partial union of the hook of the hamate fracture in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(1):106–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan EB. Functional & Surgical anatomy of the hand. JP Lippincott; 1965.

  15. Boulas HJ, Milek MA. Hook of the hamate fractures. Diagnosis, treatment, and complications. Orthopaed Rev. 1990;19(6):518–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray WT, Meuller PR, Rosenthal DI, Jauernek RR. Fracture of the hook of the hamate. Am J Roentgenol. 1979;133(5):899–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Futami T, Aoki H, Tsukamoto Y. Fractures of the hook of the hamate in athletes: 8 cases followed for 6 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64(4):469–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stark HH, Chao EK, Zemel NP, Rickard TA, Ashworth CR. Fracture of the hook of the hamate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(8):1202–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bachoura A, Wroblewski A, Jacoby SM, Osterman AL, Culp RW. Hook of hamate fractures in competitive baseball players. Hand. 2013;8(3):302–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Devers BN, Douglas KC, Naik RD, Lee DH, Watson JT, Weikert DR. Outcomes of hook of hamate fracture excision in high-level amateur athletes. J Hand Surg. 2013;38(1):72–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith P, Wright TW, Wallace PF, Dell PC. Excision of the hook of the hamate: a retrospective survey and review of the literature. J Hand Surg. 1988;13(4):612–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheufler O, Andresen R, Radmer S, Erdmann D, Exner K, Germann G. Hook of hamate fractures: critical evaluation of different therapeutic procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(2):488–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Shea K, Weiland AJ. Fractures of the hamate and pisiform bones. Hand Clin. 2012;28(3):287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Norman AL, Nelson JO, Green ST. Fractures of the hook of hamate: radiographic signs. Radiology. 1985;154(1):49–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Papilion JD, DuPuy TE, Aulicino PL, Bergfield TG, Gwathmey FW. Radiographic evaluation of the hook of the hamate: a new technique. J Hand Surg. 1988;13(3):437–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kato H, Nakamura R, Horii E, Nakao E, Yajima H. Diagnostic imaging for fracture of the hook of the hamate. Hand Surg. 2000;5(01):19–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Andresen R, Radmer S, Sparmann M, Bogusch G, Banzer D. Imaging of hamate bone fractures in conventional X-rays and high-resolution computed tomography: an in vitro study. Investig Radiol. 1999;34(1):46–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Masada K, Kanazawa M, Fuji T. Flexor tendon ruptures caused by an intraosseous ganglion of the hook of the hamate. J Hand Surg. 1997;22(3):383–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Foster EJ, Palmer AK, Levinsohn EM. Hamate erosion: an unusual result of ulnar artery constriction. J Hand Surg. 1979;4(6):536–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jackson WJ, Markiewitz AD. Osteoid osteoma of the hamate. Orthopedics. 2008;31(5).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Brian Everist, MD, Douglas Nelson, MD, Gary Hinson, MD, Kevin Brown, MD, and Anders Grinde, MD for contributing their time and expertise to imaging interpretations. Thanks to Lauren Clark, MS and Shelby Bell for their contributions to statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jayden Spencer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spencer, J., Hunt, S.L., Zhang, C. et al. Radiographic signs of hook of hamate fracture: evaluation of diagnostic utility. Skeletal Radiol 48, 1891–1898 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03221-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03221-0

Keywords

Navigation