Abstract
Background
Computed tomography (CT)-guided cervical nerve injections are broadly being used in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy; however, catastrophic complications have been reported. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of a novel CT-guided cervical injection technique.
Materials and methods
We prospectively performed cervical injections in 28 patients with cervical radiculopathies using a novel CT-guided cervical transforaminal injection technique; lateral peri-isthmic approach in which the tip of the needle advanced to the lateral cortex of the isthmus instead of the foraminal area. Patients’ pain reduction rates were evaluated using visual analog scores (VAS) at pre-treatment, immediately after treatment, at 3 weeks and 6 months after the treatment. Intra-vascular contrast medium injections and distribution of the contrast material into the foraminal, epidural or extraforaminal area during the procedure were noted.
Results
Pre-treatment pain scores were reduced by 4.2 ± 1.4 (p < 0.001), 3.9 ± 1.37 (p < 0.001) and 3.25 ± 1.53 (p < 0.001) immediately after the treatment, 3 weeks and 6 months after the treatment respectively. The number of patients with >50% pain relief as measured by VAS were 21 (75%) immediately after the procedure, 19 (67.8%) at 3 weeks and 17 (60%) at 6 months after the procedure. The injected contrast material was dispersed into the neural foramen in 9 cases (32.1%), the foraminal and epidural area in 14 cases (50%) and the extraforaminal area in 5 cases (17.9%).
Conclusion
The CT-guided lateral peri-isthmic approach seems to be a secure and feasible method for cervical injections with satisfactory pain reduction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, Kurland L. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy: a population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994;117:325–35.
Silbergleit R, Mehta BA, Sanders WP, Talati SJ. Imaging-guided injection techniques with fluoroscopy and CT for spinal pain management. Radiographics. 2001;21:927–39.
Palmer WE. Spinal injections for pain management. Radiology. 2016;281:669–88.
Brunner P, Amoretti N, Soares F, Brunner E, Cazaux E, Brocq O. Approaches in injections for radicular pain: the transforaminal, epidural and transfacet approaches. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2012;93:711–22.
Rathmell JP, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Cervical transforaminal injection of steroids. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1595–600.
McMillan MR, Crumpton C. Cortical blindness and neurologic injury complicating cervical transforaminal injection for cervical radiculopathy. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:509–11.
Tiso RL, Cutler T, Catania JA, Whalen K. Adverse central nervous system sequelae after selective transforaminal block: the role of corticosteroids. Spine J. 2004;4:468–74.
Ludwig MA, Burns SP. Spinal cord infarction following cervical transforaminal epidural injection: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:266–8.
Beckman WA, Mendez RJ, Paine GF, Mazzilli MA. Cerebellar herniation after cervical transforaminal epidural injection. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:282–5.
Muro K, O’Shaughnessy B, Ganju A. Infarction of the cervical spinal cord following multilevel transforaminal epidural steroid injection: case report and review of the literature. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30:385–8.
Hoang JK, Massoglia DP, Apostol MA, Lascola CD, Eastwood JD, Kranz P. CT-guided cervical transforaminal steroid injections: where should the needle tip be located? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:688–92.
Cyteval C, Thomas E, Decoux EP, Sarrabere MP, Cottin A, Blotman F, et al. Cervical radiculopathy: open study on percutaneous periradicular foraminal steroid infiltration performed under CT control in 30 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:441–5.
Suresh S, Berman J, Connell DA. Cerebellar and brainstem infarction as a complication of CT-guided transforaminal cervical nerve root block. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:449–52.
Rosenkranz M, Grzyska U, Niesen W, Fuchs K, Schummer W, Weiller C, et al. Anterior spinal artery syndrome following periradicular cervical nerve root therapy. J Neurol. 2004;251:229–31.
Kranz PG, Raduazo PA. Technique for CT fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar steroid injections. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;198:675–7.
Bose B. Quadriparesis following cervical epidural steroid injections: case report and review of the literature. Spine J. 2005;5:558–63.
Kranz PG, Amrhein TJ, Gray L. Incidence of inadvertent intravascular injection during CT fluoroscopy-guided epidural steroid injections. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1000–7.
Wolter T, Mohadjer M, Berlis A, Knoeller S. Cervical CT-guided, selective nerve root blocks: improved safety by dorsal approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:336–7.
Lagemann GM, Yannes MP, Ghodadra A, Rothfus WE, Agarwal V. CT-fluoroscopic cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections: extraforaminal needle tip position decreases risk of intravascular injection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:766–72.
Robinson KY, Lagemann GM, Ghodadra A, Agarwal V. Extraforaminal needle tip position reduces risk of intravascular injection in CT-fluoroscopic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. J Spine Surg. 2016;24:246.
Hoeft MA, Rathmell JP, Monsey RD, Fonda BJ. Cervical transforaminal injection and the radicular artery: variation in anatomical location within the cervical intervertebral foramina. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:270–4.
Cho CH. Cervical nerve injection: computed tomography guidance with intravenous contrast and extraforaminal needle placement. Series of seven consecutive case reports. Spine J. 2010;10:1–6.
Wagner AL. CT fluoroscopic-guided cervical nerve root blocks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:43–4.
Wald JT, Maus TP, Geske JR, Carter RE, Diehn FE, Kaufmann TJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of CT-guided transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections using a posterior approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:415–9.
Bureau NJ, Moser T, Dagher JH, Shedid D, Li M, Brassard P, et al. Transforaminal versus intra-articular facet corticosteroid injections for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:1467–74.
Dietrich TJ, Sutter R, Froehlich JM, Pfirrmann CW. Particulate versus non-particulate steroids for lumbar transforaminal or interlaminar epidural steroid injections: an update. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:149–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The local ethics committee approved this prospective study and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ulusoy, O.L., Alis, D., Mutlu, A. et al. The preliminary results of a new CT-guided periradicular cervical steroid injection technique: safety and feasibility of the lateral peri-isthmic approach in 28 patients. Skeletal Radiol 47, 1607–1613 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2986-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2986-5