Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MDCT arthrography assessment of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse: distribution of cartilage damage and relationship with scaphoid nonunion features

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Our primary aim was to evaluate the distribution and severity of cartilage damage in a sample of patients with scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC), assessed on MDCT arthrography, with regard to two well-known SNAC staging systems. Secondarily, we wanted to see if the degree of cartilage damage varied with the location of the nonunion.

Methods

We retrospectively included 35 patients with a history of SNAC who had undergone MDCT arthrography. The location of the fracture was defined as the proximal, middle, or distal third of the scaphoid. Cartilage damage was assessed in 14 distinct regions of the wrist using a modified Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) system. Staging of SNAC for each patient was based on the distribution of cartilage damage seen on MDCT arthrography. The one-way ANOVA test was used to evaluate whether global cartilage damage scores differed between patients with proximal vs middle and distal nonunion.

Results

The radial styloid-scaphoid (85.7%), the scaphoid-trapezium-trapezoid (60%), the scapho-capitate (57.1%), and the proximal radio-scaphoid joints (42.9%) were most commonly affected by degenerative cartilage damage. A substantial number of patients could not be classified according to the two SNAC staging systems. Patients with proximal nonunion exhibited a higher mean score of global cartilage damage than patients with middle or distal nonunion: 14.3 ± 9.5 (95% CI 9.8, 18.7) vs 8.6 ± 6.9 (95% CI 4.7, 12.4); p < 0.0001.

Conclusion

The distribution of cartilage damage does not always follow the pattern of progressive osteoarthritis widely described in SNAC. Proximal scaphoid nonunion is related to greater severity of global cartilage damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah CM, Stern PJ. Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist arthritis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Moritomo H, Tada K, Yoshida T, Masatomi T. The relationship between the site of nonunion of the scaphoid and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC). J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1999;81:871–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrington RH, Lichtman DM, Brockmole DM. Common pathways of degenerative arthritis of the wrist. Hand Clin. 1987;3:507–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vender MI, Watson HK, Wiener BD, Black DM. Degenerative change in symptomatic scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1987;12:514–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson HK, Ballet FL. The SLAC wrist: scapholunate advanced collapse pattern of degenerative arthritis. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9:358–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watson HK, Ryu J. Evolution of arthritis of the wrist. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(202)57–67.

  7. Strauch RJ. Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse arthritis—update on evaluation and treatment. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2011;36:729–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guermazi A, Niu J, Hayashi D, et al. Prevalence of abnormalities in knees detected by MRI in adults without knee osteoarthritis: population based observational study (Framingham osteoarthritis study). BMJ. 2012;345:e5339.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Crema MD, Zentner J, Guermazi A, Jomaah N, Marra MD, Roemer FW. Scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse: MDCT arthrography features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:W202–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moser T, Dosch JC, Moussaoui A, Buy X, Gangi A, Dietemann JL. Multidetector CT arthrography of the wrist joint: how to do it. Radiographics. 2008;28:787–800. quiz 911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hannemann PF, Brouwers L, van der Zee D, et al. Multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography for diagnosis of scaphoid waist fracture union: a prospective cohort analysis of accuracy and precision. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:1377–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterfy C, Guermazi A, Zaim S, et al. Whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12:177–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eaton RG, Lane LB, Littler JW, et al. Ligament reconstruction for the painful thumb carpometacarpal joint: a long-term assessment. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9:692–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolf JM. Treatment of scaphotrapezio-trapezoid arthritis. Hand Clin. 2008;24:301–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buijze GA, Ochtman L, Ring D. Management of scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2012;37:1095–100; quiz 101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel D. Crema.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Author MDC is VP musculoskeletal and shareholder of Boston Imaging Core Lab (BICL), LLC. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crema, M.D., Phan, C., Miquel, A. et al. MDCT arthrography assessment of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse: distribution of cartilage damage and relationship with scaphoid nonunion features. Skeletal Radiol 47, 1157–1165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2907-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-2907-7

Keywords

Navigation