Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A study of radiological features of healing in long bone fractures among infants less than a year

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To create a timetable for dating long bone fractures in infants aged less than 1 year using previously defined radiographic signs of fracture healing.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cross-sectional time series of long bone fractures in infants aged less than 1 year was conducted from 2006 to 2013. After exclusion criteria were applied 59 digital image series were available for review from 40 infants. Utilizing published criteria for dating fractures, the presence or absence of four pre-defined features of healing was scored: periosteal reaction, callus, bridging, and remodeling. Three radiologists independently scored radiographs with a 3-point scale, marking each feature as present, absent, or equivocal. The times in days when features were first seen, peaked (feature agreed present in >40% of images), and last seen were noted. Statistical analysis using free marginal kappa was conducted.

Results

The level of agreement among the three radiologists was high (0.64–0.85). The sequence in which the features were seen was: periosteal reaction range 7–130 (present in the majority of cases between 9 and 49 days); callus range 9–130 (present in the majority of cases between days 9–26); bridging range 15–130 (seen in the majority of cases between 15 and 67 days); remodeling range 51–247 days.

Conclusion

This study provides a timetable of radiological features of long bone healing among young infants for the first time. Dating of incomplete long bone fractures is challenging, beyond the presence of periosteal reaction, but a consistent sequence of changes is present in complete fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skellern CY, Wood DO, Murphy A, Crawford M. Non-accidental fractures in infants: risk of further abuse. J Paediatr Child Health. 2000;36:590–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoskote A, Martin K, Hormbrey P, Burns E. Fractures in infants: one in four is non-accidental. Child Abuse Rev. 2003;12:384–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Malone CA, Sauer NJ, Fenton TW. A radiographic assessment of pediatric fracture healing and time since injury. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:1123–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Connor JF, Cohen J. Dating fractures. In: Kleinman P, editor. Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walters MM, Forbes PW, Buonomo C, Kleinman PK. Healing patterns of clavicular birth injuries as a guide to fracture dating in cases of possible infant abuse. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44:1224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleinman P, Walters MM. Dating Fractures. In: Kleinman P, editor. Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2015.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Prosser I, Maguire S, Harrison SK, Mann M, Sibert JR, Kemp AM. How old is this fracture? Radiologic dating of fractures in children: a systematic review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1282–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Islam O, Soboleski D, Symons S, Davidson LK, Ashworth MA, Babyn P. Development and duration of radiographic signs of bone healing in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:75–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prosser I, Lawson Z, Evans A, Harrison S, Morris S, Maguire S, et al. A timetable for the radiologic features of fracture healing in young children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:1014–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cumming WA. Neonatal skeletal fractures. Birth trauma or child abuse. J Assoc Can Radiol. 1979;30:30–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yeo LI, Reed MH. Staging of healing of femoral fractures in children. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1994;45:16–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Halliday KE, Broderick NJ, Somers JM, Hawkes R. Dating fractures in infants. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:1049–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Elizabeth Caroll, Research Assistant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Warner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

This article does not contain identifiable patient data.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Number of agreed periosteal reactions/callus on all, complete and incomplete, fractures and total number of images over time (days)
Table 6 The presence of bridging and remodeling of all, complete and incomplete, fractures and the total number of images over time (days)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warner, C., Maguire, S., Trefan, L. et al. A study of radiological features of healing in long bone fractures among infants less than a year. Skeletal Radiol 46, 333–341 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2563-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2563-8

Keywords

Navigation