Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pre-authorization processes have no effect on patients undergoing knee MRI in a pediatric setting when evaluated by specialists

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Pre-authorization processes are often used by medical insurance companies to reduce costs by managing the utilization of advanced diagnostic imaging, and their impact on patient care is unclear. The purpose of our study is to determine if a pre-authorization process increases the rate of surgically significant abnormal knee MRI and surgical referrals compared with patients referred from pediatric orthopedic specialists who do not undergo a pre-authorization process.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study was performed; 124 patients were identified who were referred for knee MRI by a pediatric orthopedist. The study population included patients who underwent an insurance pre-authorization process and the control group consisted of those who did not. The results of the MRI and whether they were deemed surgically significant, in addition to surgical referral, were recorded and compared.

Results

The study and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in outcome with regard to surgically significant findings on MRI (p = 0.92) or whether the patient required surgery (p = 0.6).

Conclusions

In this population, there is no difference in the likelihood of an abnormal knee MRI demonstrating surgically significant findings or referral to surgery in patients who did and those who did not undergo an insurance pre-authorization process when patients are referred from a pediatric orthopedic specialist. The insurance pre-authorization process does not appear to have an impact on patient diagnosis and treatment and may unnecessarily add bureaucracy and costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/preauthorization

  2. Robinson JD, Hippe DS, Hiatt MD. The effect of a no-denial policy on imaging utilization. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10(7):501–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morley CP, Badolato DJ, Hickner J, Epling JW. The impact of prior authorization requirements on primary care physicians’ offices: report of two parallel network studies. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26(1):93–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schneider J, Pinkard S. Prior authorization and overuse of imaging. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(12):2830. .

    Google Scholar 

  5. ACR–SSR practice parameter for the performance and interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee. http://www.acr.org/~/media/4A4471FCA2B449059EFEB2DAB5421EB4.pdf

  6. Munshi M, Davidson M, MacDonald PB, Froese W, Sutherland K. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee injuries. Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10(1):34–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kern LM, Wilcox A, Shapiro J, Dhopeshwarkar RV, Kaushal R. Which components of health information technology will drive financial value? Am J Manag Care. 2012;18(8):438–45.http://www.ajmc.com/publications/issue/2012/2012-8-vol18-n8/Which-Components-of-Health-Information-Technology-Will-Drive-Financial-Value#sthash.vms3iNKy.dpuf. http://www.ajmc.com/publications/issue/2012/2012-8-vol18-n8/A-Technology-Solution-for-the-High-Tech-Diagnostic-Imaging-Conundrum/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Drew Pierce.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimers

The opinions expressed in this article belong to the authors alone and not to any institution or source of funding.

Sources of support

This manuscript required no outside support, aside from the time spent by the authors in compiling and analyzing data and preparing this manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial interests to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pierce, D., Kan, J.H., May, M. et al. Pre-authorization processes have no effect on patients undergoing knee MRI in a pediatric setting when evaluated by specialists. Skeletal Radiol 46, 171–175 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2509-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2509-1

Keywords

Navigation