Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship of specific MRI findings to treatment outcomes in patients receiving transforaminal epidural steroid injections

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether specific MRI findings are related to outcomes after lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) and to assess the inter-rater reliability of imaging diagnosis.

Materials and methods

A prospective outcomes study on 156 consecutive patients with 1-month follow-up outcomes data and MRI within 3 months of TFESI was conducted. Pain levels (numerical rating scale) (NRS) were recorded prior to injection. Overall ‘improvement’ was determined using the Patients Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale and NRS data were collected at three time points post injection. Two radiologists independently evaluated all images blinded to treatment outcome for reliability of diagnosis. The Chi-square test compared MRI findings for the senior radiologist to ‘improvement’. NRS change scores were compared to MRI findings with the unpaired t-test or ANOVA. Kappa and percent agreement assessed inter-rater agreement of diagnosis.

Results

The only abnormality linked to ‘improvement’ (p = 0.03) and higher NRS change scores (p = 0.0001) at 1 month was the disc herniation morphology ‘protrusion + sequestration’. Patients with degeneration by osteophytes (p = 0.034), grade 3 foraminal nerve root compression (p = 0.01) and foraminal/extraforaminal location of herniation (p = 0.014) also had higher 1 month NRS change scores. Reliability of diagnosis was ‘fair’ to ‘substantial’ depending on MRI findings.

Conclusions

Patients with disc protrusion plus sequestration were significantly more likely to report overall improvement and more pain reduction at 1 month. Higher pain reduction was noted in patients with degeneration by osteophytes, grade 3 foraminal nerve root compression, or foraminal/extraforaminal disc herniation location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gore M, Sadosky A, Stacey BR, Tai KS, Leslie D. The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings. Spine. 2012;37:E668-77.

  2. van Tulder M, Koes B, Bombardier C. Low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002;16:761–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burton AK, Balagué F, Cardon G, et al. Chapter 2. European guidelines for prevention in low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl)2:S136–68.

  4. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R. Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. JAMA. 2003;290:2443–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wieser S, Horisberger B, Schmidhauser S, et al. Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12:455–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ricci JA, Stewart WF, Chee E, Leotta C, Foley K, Hochberg MC. Back pain exacerbations and lost productive time costs in United States workers. Spine. 2006;31:3052–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wassenaar M, van Rijn RM, van Tulder MW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:220–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Balagué F, Dudler J. An overview of conservative treatment for lower back pain. Int J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;6:281–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manchikanti L, Buenaventura RM, Manchikanti KN, et al. Effectiveness of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in managing lumbar spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2012;15:E199–245.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manchikanti L, Nampiaparampil D, Manchikanti K, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of saline, local anesthetics, and steroids in epidural and facet joint injections for the management of spinal pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:S194–235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson C, Hodler J. Evidence-based radiology (part 1): is there sufficient research to support the use of therapeutic injections for the spine and sacroiliac joints? Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39:5–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JW, Choi SW, Park SH, Lee GY, Kang HS. MR-based outcome predictors of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection for lumbar radiculopathy caused by herniated intervertebral disc. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi SJ, Song JS, Kim C, et al. The use of magnetic resonance imaging to predict the clinical outcome of non-surgical treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Korean J Radiol. 2007;8:156–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghahreman A, Bogduk N. Predictors of a favorable response to transforaminal injection of steroids in patients with lumbar radicular pain due to disc herniation. Pain Med. 2011;12:871–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fardon DF, Milette PC. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine. 2001;26:E93–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfirrmann CW, Dora C, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. MR image-based grading of lumbar nerve root compromise due to disk herniation: reliability study with surgical correlation. Radiology. 2004;230:583–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, et al. A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1095–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine. 2010;35:1919–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lechmann M, Peterson CK, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J. Lumbar nerve root injections: a prospective cohort outcomes study comparing age- and gender-matched patients who returned an outcomes-based postal questionnaire with patients who did not return the postal questionnaire. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:1429–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:1331–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Newell D, Bolton JE. Responsiveness of the Bournemouth questionnaire in determining minimal clinically important change in subgroups of low back pain patients. Spine. 2010;35:1801–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J. 2014;14:2525–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Janardhana AP, Rajagopal, Rao S, Kamath A. Correlation between clinical features and magnetic resonance imaging findings in lumbar disc prolapse. Indian J Orthop. 2010;44:263–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rehman IU, Hamid RS, Akhtar W, Naqi R, Shamim MS. Observer variation in MRI evaluation of patients with suspected lumbar disc herniation and nerve root compression: comparison of Neuroradiologist and Neurosurgeon’s interpretations. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012;62:826–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fu MC, Buerba RA, Long WD, et al. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions. Spine J. 2015;14:2442–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bensler S, Sutter R, Pfirrmann CW, Peterson CK. Long term outcome from CT-guided indirect cervical nerve root blocks and their relationship to the MRI findings: a prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3405–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland

    Marco Lechmann, Andrea Rosskopf, Christine Ehrmann, Reto Sutter, Christian W. A. Pfirrmann & Cynthia K. Peterson

Authors
  1. Marco Lechmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Rosskopf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine Ehrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Reto Sutter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christian W. A. Pfirrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cynthia K. Peterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia K. Peterson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lechmann, M., Rosskopf, A., Ehrmann, C. et al. Relationship of specific MRI findings to treatment outcomes in patients receiving transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Skeletal Radiol 45, 1677–1685 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2487-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2487-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation