Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of 2D radiography and a semi-automatic CT-based 3D method for measuring change in dorsal angulation over time in distal radius fractures

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the present study was to compare the reliability and agreement between a computer tomography-based method (CT) and digitalised 2D radiographs (XR) when measuring change in dorsal angulation over time in distal radius fractures.

Materials and methods

Radiographs from 33 distal radius fractures treated with external fixation were retrospectively analysed. All fractures had been examined using both XR and CT at six times over 6 months postoperatively. The changes in dorsal angulation between the first reference images and the following examinations in every patient were calculated from 133 follow-up measurements by two assessors and repeated at two different time points. The measurements were analysed using Bland–Altman plots, comparing intra- and inter-observer agreement within and between XR and CT.

Results

The mean differences in intra- and inter-observer measurements for XR, CT, and between XR and CT were close to zero, implying equal validity. The average intra- and inter-observer limits of agreement for XR, CT, and between XR and CT were ± 4.4°, ± 1.9° and ± 6.8° respectively.

Conclusions

For scientific purpose, the reliability of XR seems unacceptably low when measuring changes in dorsal angulation in distal radius fractures, whereas the reliability for the semi-automatic CT-based method was higher and is therefore preferable when a more precise method is requested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keats TE, Teeslink R, Diamond AE, Williams JH. Normal axial relationships of the major joints. Radiology. 1966;87(5):904–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Linden W, Ericson R. Colles' fracture. How should its displacement be measured and how should it be immobilized? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(8):1285–8.

  3. Kreder HJ, Hanel DP, McKee M, Jupiter J, McGillivary G, Swiontkowski MF. X-ray film measurements for healed distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg. 1996;21(1):31–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson PG, Szabo RM. Angle measurements of the distal radius: a cadaver study. Skeletal Radiol. 1993;22(4):243–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Friberg S, Lundstrom B. Radiographic measurements of the radio-carpal joint in normal adults. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1976;17(2):249–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Medoff RJ. Essential radiographic evaluation for distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2005;21(3):279–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thomason K, Smith KL. The reliability of measurements taken from computer-stored digitalised x-rays of acute distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008;33(3):369–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bozentka DJ, Beredjiklian PK, Westawski D, Steinberg DR. Digital radiographs in the assessment of distal radius fracture parameters. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:409–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grainger AJ, Duryea J, Elliott JM, Genant HK. The evaluation of a new digital semi-automated system for the radiological assessment of distal radial fractures. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31(8):457–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyake J, Murase T, Yamanaka Y, Moritomo H, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H. Comparison of three dimensional and radiographic measurements in the analysis of distal radius malunion. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013;38(2):133–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;232:1–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Bruin PW, Kaptein BL, Stoel BC, Reiber JH, Rozing PM, Valstar ER. Imaged-based RSA: roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis based on 2D–3D image registration. J Biomech. 2008;41(1):155–64.

  14. Nysjö J, Christersson A, Malmberg F, Sintorn I-M, Nyström I. Towards user-guided quantitative evaluation of wrist fractures in CT images. In: Bolc L, Tadeusiewicz R, Chmielewski L, Wojciechowski K, editors. Computer vision and graphics. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 2012. p. 204–11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Nysjö J, Christersson A, Sintorn I-M, Nyström I, Larsson S, Malmberg F. Precise 3D angle measurements in CT wrist images. In: Petrosino A, editor. Image analysis and processing – ICIAP 2013. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 479–88.

  16. Christersson A, Sanden B, Larsson S. Prospective randomized feasibility trial to assess the use of rhPDGF-BB in treatment of distal radius fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Canny J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1986;PAMI-8(6):679–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph. 1987;21(4):163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lai Y-K, Hu S-M, Martin RR, Rosin PL. Rapid and effective segmentation of 3D models using random walks. Comput Aided Geom Des. 2009;26(6):665–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1992;14(2):239–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fischler MA, Bolles RC. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun ACM. 1981;24(6):381–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Escaramis G, Ascaso C, Carrasco JL. The total deviation index estimated by tolerance intervals to evaluate the concordance of measurement devices. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Biswas D, Bible JE, Bohan M, Simpson AK, Whang PG, Grauer JN. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(8):1882–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Christersson.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christersson, A., Nysjö, J., Berglund, L. et al. Comparison of 2D radiography and a semi-automatic CT-based 3D method for measuring change in dorsal angulation over time in distal radius fractures. Skeletal Radiol 45, 763–769 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2350-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2350-6

Keywords

Navigation