Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sonography of chondral print on humeral head

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of sonography in order to identify the chondral print on the humeral head.

Materials and methods

In total, 44 patients who had already been candidates for arthroscopic surgery were prospectively studied with ultrasound to assess the presence of humeral subchondral erosion at the level of the biceps pulley; no patient had undergone previous surgery or radiographic calcification of rotator cuff tendons. Using arthroscopy as the reference standard the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, negative predictive and diagnostic accuracy values were calculated.

Results

Of the 44 patients, arthroscopy showed the humeral chondral print in 30 patients. Of the 30 arthroscopy proven humeral chondral prints, ultrasound identified 28 subchondral erosions at the same level, with two false negatives. One of the 14 patients without arthroscopic humeral chondral print was positive for subchondral erosion at ultrasound. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, negative predictive, and diagnostic accuracy values of ultrasound were respectively of 93, 93, 96, 87 and 93 %.

Conclusion

Ultrasound has a good diagnostic accuracy in identifying the chondral print sign.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beltran J, Jbara M, Maimon R. Shoulder: labrum and bicipital tendon. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;14:35–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vangsness Jr CT, Jorgenson SS, Watson T, Johnson DL. The origin of the long head of the biceps from the scapula and glenoid labrum: an anatomical study of 100 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1994;76:951–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Levigne C, Renaud E. Tears of the supraspinatus tendon associated with “hidden” lesions of the rotator interval. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3:353–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castagna A, Mouhsine E, Conti M, Vinci E, Borroni M, Giardella A, et al. Chondral print on humeral head: an indirect sign of long head biceps tendon instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(5):645–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Prato N, et al. US of the shoulder: non–rotator cuff disorders. RadioGraphics. 2003;23:381–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Pritsch M, Scheibel MT, Lichtenberg S. Anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder as a result of pulley lesions: a prospective arthroscopic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(1):5–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett WF. Visualization of the anatomy of the rotator interval and bicipital sheath. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(1):107–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerber C, Sebesta A. Impingement of the deep surface of the subscapularis tendon and the reflection pulley on the anterosuperior glenoid rim: a preliminary report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9(6):483–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baumann B, Genning K, Böhm D, Rolf O, Gohlke F. Arthroscopic prevalence of pulley lesions in 1007 consecutive patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):14–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rowe CR, Zarins B. Recurrent transient subluxation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:863–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zappia M, Reginelli A, Russo A, et al. Long head of the biceps tendon and rotator interval. Musculoskelet Surg. 2013;97:S99–S108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chung CB, Dwek JR, Cho GJ, Lektrakul N, Trudell D, Resnick D. Rotator cuff interval: evaluation with MR imaging and MR arthrography of the shoulder in 32 cadavers. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24:738–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho CP. MR. Imaging of rotator interval, long biceps and associated injuries in the overhead-throwing athlete. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1999;7:23–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakata W, Katou S, Fujita A, Nakata M, Lefor AT, Sugimoto H. Biceps pulley: normal anatomy and associated lesions at MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2011;31(3):791–810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JC, Guy S, Connell D, Saifuddin A, Lambert S. MRI of the rotator interval of the shoulder. Clin Radiol. 2007;62(5):416–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chandnani VP, Gagliardi JA, Murnane TG, et al. Glenohumeral ligaments and shoulder capsular mechanism: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology. 1995;196(1):27–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barile A, Lanni G, Conti L, et al. Lesions of the biceps pulley as cause of anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder in the athlete: potentials and limits of MR arthrography compared with arthroscopy. Radiol Med. 2013;118(1):112–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tuijthof GJ, Kok AC, Terra MP, Aaftink JF, Streekstra GJ, van Dijk CN, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in detecting (osteo)chondral defects: a cadaveric study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(8):1368–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Zappia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zappia, M., Carfora, M., Romano, A.M. et al. Sonography of chondral print on humeral head. Skeletal Radiol 45, 35–40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2238-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2238-x

Keywords

Navigation