Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Osteoma of long bone: an expanding spectrum of imaging findings

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteoma of long bone is an extremely rare, benign bone-forming surface lesion with the largest published case series consisting of only 14 patients. The most important and often most difficult lesion to differentiate from osteoma of long bone radiographically is parosteal osteosarcoma, which is a rare, low-grade surface osteosarcoma with the potential for dedifferentiation. Reports of imaging studies of osteoma of long bone depict a well-defined ossified mass arising from the surface of the diaphysis or metadiaphysis of a long bone. A characteristic feature is the homogeneity of the mass, with uniform density near or equal to that of cortical bone from the base of the lesion to its periphery. The 45-year-old female in this case presented with left hip fullness and was subsequently found to have a proximal femoral osteoma, which was unique in that it contained large fatty marrow spaces that corresponded to bands of relatively low density on plain radiography and computed tomography, giving it a heterogeneous appearance atypical of osteoma of long bone. Furthermore, the osteoma reported here was associated with a small but separate nodular focus of ossification in the adjacent soft tissue. These findings led to a presumptive diagnosis of parosteal osteosarcoma with a local soft tissue metastasis or satellite nodule resulting in radical resection of the tumor. Definitive diagnosis of osteoma was made on histology of both the parent lesion and ossified nodule as no neoplastic spindle cell proliferation was present to establish a diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcoma. This represents, to the best of our knowledge, the first such presentation of osteoma of long bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F (Eds): World Health Organization classification of tumours. pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. IARC Press: Lyon 2002.

  2. Geschickter CF, Copeland MM. Parosteal osteoma of bone: a new entity. Ann Surg. 1951;133:790–807C.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meltzer CC, Scott Jr WW, McCarthy EF. Case report 698: osteoma of the clavicle. Skelet Radiol. 1991;20:555–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cervilla V, Haghighi P, Resnick D, Sartoris DJ. Case report 596: parosteal osteoma of the acetabulum. Skelet Radiol. 1990;19:135–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baum PA, Nelson MC, Lack EE, Bogumill GP. Case report 560: parosteal osteoma of the tibia. Skelet Radiol. 1989;18:406–09.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chikuda H, Goto T, Ishida T, Iijima T, Nakamura K. Juxtacortical osteoma of the ulna. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7:721–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bertoni F, Unni KK, Beabout JW, Sim FH. Parosteal osteoma of bones other than the skull and face. Cancer. 1995;75:2466–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sundaram M, Falbo S, McDonald D, Janney C. Surface osteomas of the appendicular skeleton. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:1529–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Houghton MJ, Heiner JP, De Smet AA. Osteoma of the innominate bone with intraosseous and parosteal involvement. Skelet Radiol. 1995;24:455–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehara S. Parosteal osteoma of the iliac bone. Skelet Radiol. 1998;27:650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soler Rich R, Martinez S, de Marcos JA, Salas A, Lluc P, Granados J. Parosteal osteoma of the iliac bone. Skelet Radiol. 1998;27:161–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lambiase RE, Levine SM, Terek RM, Wyman JJ. Long bone surface osteomas: imaging features that may help avoid unnecessary biopsies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:775–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connell JX, Rosenthal DI, Mankin HJ, Rosenberg AE. Solitary osteoma of a long bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1830–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seeger LL, Yao L, Eckardt JJ. Surface lesions of the bone. Radiology. 1998;206:17–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yun S, Jin W, Park YK, et al. Simultaneously detected parosteal osteoma and osteochondroma in the distal femur of a single patient. Clin Imaging. 2013;37:950–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphey MD, Robbin MR, McRae GA, Flemming DJ, Temple HT, Kransdorf MJ. The many faces of osteosarcoma. Radiographics. 1997;17:1205–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okada K, Frassica FJ, Sim FH, Beabout JW, Bond JR, Unni KK. Parosteal osteosarcoma. A clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:366–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Staals EL, Davidovitz P. Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma: the experience of the Rizzoli Institute. Cancer. 2005;103:2373–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murashkovskii MA. Parosteal osteosarcoma with soft tissue metastasis. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 1977;3:86–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takeuchi K, Morii T, Yabe H, Morioka H, Mukai M, Toyama Y. Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma with well-differentiated metastases. Skelet Radiol. 2006;35:778–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding Y, Cai YB, Zhang Q. Parosteal osteosarcoma: a clinical study of 48 cases. Zhongua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2003;41:832–36.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wolf R, Wolf RF, Hoekstra HJ. Recurrent, multiple, calcified soft tissue metastases from osteogenic sarcoma without pulmonary involvement. Skelet Radiol. 1999;28:710–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Papathanassiou ZG, Alberghini M, Thiesse P, et al. Parosteal osteosarcoma mimicking osteochondroma: a radio-histologic approach on two cases. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2011;1:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Donmez FY, Tuzun U, Basaran C, Tunaci M, Bilgic B, Acunas G. MRI findings in parosteal osteosarcoma: correlation with histopathology. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2008;14:142–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH. Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2000;20:1407–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McCarthy EF, Sundaram M. Heterotopic ossification. A review. Skelet Radiol. 2005;34:609–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry Glenn Hansford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hansford, B.G., Pytel, P., Moore, D.D. et al. Osteoma of long bone: an expanding spectrum of imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol 44, 755–761 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2046-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2046-8

Keywords

Navigation