Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The development and implementation of an outcomes database for imaging-guided therapeutic musculoskeletal injections

  • Technical Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To present the process of creating an imaging-guided injections outcomes database and to reflect on how this database has affected the scientific activities of the radiology department.

Materials and methods

The literature was searched to identify studies on the effectiveness of musculoskeletal therapeutic injections, areas where research is lacking, and relevant outcome measures. Validated outcome measures were chosen and tested in a pilot study. Data collection time points of 1 day, 1 week and 1 month post-injection were determined and the post-pilot study postal questionnaires were created. The data collection process began and has been ongoing for over 4 years. Critical reflection on the process and outcomes from the database occurred.

Results

The 9 steps to creating this outcomes database are presented. The numerical rating scale for pain (NRS) and the Patient’s Global Impression of Change (PGIC) were identified as the most valid, reliable, and time-effective outcome measures. At most, 50 % of patients return their postal questionnaire. The database has facilitated the publication of numerous research projects.

Conclusions

Setting up an outcomes database is straightforward and productive. The NRS and PGIC were considered the most useful outcome measures. This database facilitated critical reflection on current practice and provides the foundation for several research studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Brien JM, Corrigan J, Reitzner JB, et al. Will performance measurement lead to better patient outcomes? What are the roles of the National Quality Forum and Medical Specialty Societies? Chest. 2012;141:300–7. doi:10.1378/Chest.11-1942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spencer A. The white papers, quality indicators and clinical responsibility. Clin Med. 2012;12:19–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. The world health report 2000. Health systems: improving performance. Geneva: WHO; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou YL, Thompson S. Quality assurance for interventional pain management procedures in private practice. Pain Physician. 2008;11:43–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryan A, Blustein J. Making the best of hospital pay for performance. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1557–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1202563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou YL, Furgang FA, Zhang YP. Quality assurance for interventional pain management procedures. Pain Physician. 2006;9:107–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine. 2011;36(21 Suppl):S54–68. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peterson C, Hodler J. Evidence-based radiology. I. Is there sufficient research to support the use of therapeutic injections for the spine and sacroiliac joints? Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39:5–9. doi:10.1007/s00256-009-0783-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peterson C, Hodler J. Evidence-based radiology. II. Is there sufficient research to support the use of therapeutic injections into the peripheral joints? Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39:11–8. doi:10.1007/s00256-009-0784-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peterson C, Hodler J. Adverse events from diagnostic and therapeutic joint injections: a literature review. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:5–12. doi:10.1007/s00256-009-0839-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sutter R, Pfirrmann CWA, Hodler J, Zanetti M, Peterson C. CT-guided cervical nerve root injections: comparing the immediate post injection anesthetic-related effects of the transforaminal injection to a new indirect technique. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:1603–8. doi:10.1007/s00256-011-1288-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buck FM, Pfirrmann CWA, Brunner F, Hodler J, Peterson C. The posterolateral fluoroscopy-guided injection technique into the subtalar joints: description of the procedure and pilot study on patient outcomes. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:699–705. doi:10.1007/s00256-011-1278-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peterson C, Buck F, Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Fluoroscopically guided diagnostic and therapeutic injections into the foot articulations. Report of short-term patient responses and comparison of outcomes between various injection sites. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:949–53. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterson CK, Saupe N, Buck F, Pfirrmann CWA, Zanetti M, Hodler J. CT-guided sternoclavicular joint injections: description of the procedure, reliability of imaging diagnosis and short-term patient responses. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:W435–9. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, Lorig K, Laurent D, Holman H. Capturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA. 1999;282:1157–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Newell D, Bolton J. Responsiveness of the Bournemouth questionnaire in determining minimal clinically important change in subgroups of low back pain patients. Spine. 2010;35:1801–6. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc0066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dietrich T, Peterson CK, Brunner F, Hodler J, Pfirrmann CW. Imaging-guided subacromial therapeutic injections: prospective study comparing abnormalities on conventional radiographs with patient outcomes. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:865–7. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Humphreys BK, Peterson C. Comparison of outcomes in neck pain patients with and without dizziness undergoing chiropractic treatment: a prospective cohort study with 6 month follow-up. BMC Chiropr Man Ther. 2013;21:13. doi:10.1186/2045-709X-21-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peterson CK, Bolton J, Humphreys BK. Predictors of outcome in neck pain patients undergoing chiropractic care: comparison of acute and chronic patients. Chiropr Man Ther. 2012;20:27. doi:10.1186/2045-709X-20-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peterson C, Bolton J, Humphreys BK. Predictors of improvement in acute and chronic low back pain patients undergoing chiropractic treatment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35:525–33. doi:10.1016/jmpt.2012.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kremer S, Pfirrmann CWA, Hodler J, Peterson CK. Imaging-guided lumbar facet injections: is there a difference in outcomes between low back pain patients who remember to return a postal questionnaire and those who do not? Insights Imaging. 2012;3:411–8. doi:10.1007/s13244-012-0178-8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peterson CK, Pfirrmann CWA, Hodler J, Humphreys BK. Gender differences in pain levels before and after treatment: a prospective outcomes study on 3,900 Swiss patients with musculoskeletal complaints. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:241. doi:10.1186/1471-2472-13-241.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peterson CK, Leemann S, Lechmann M, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J, Humphreys BK. Symptomatic magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed lumbar disk herniation patients: a comparative effectiveness prospective observational study of 2 age- and sex-matched cohorts treated with either high-velocity, low- amplitude spinal manipulative therapy or imaging-guided lumbar nerve root injections. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013;36:218–25. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lechmann M, Peterson C, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J. Lumbar nerve root injections: a prospective cohort outcomes study comparing age and gender matched patients who returned an outcomes-based postal questionnaire with patients who did not return the postal questionnaire. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:1429–35. doi:10.1007/s00256-013-1673-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Soklic M, Peterson C, Humphreys BK. Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire for neck pain. BMC Chiropr Man Ther. 2012;20:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blum-Fowler C, Peterson C, Forrer-McChurch J, LeClech Y, Humphreys BK. Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth Questionnaire for low back pain. BMC Chiropr Man Ther. 2013;21:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Axén I, Bodin L, Bergström G. The use of weekly text messaging over 6 months was a feasible method for monitoring the clinical course of low back pain in patients seeking chiropractic care. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:454–61. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jka AK, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1606–15. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1112351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for the development of the database was provided by the Vontobel-Stiftung, Tödistrasse 17, 8002 Zürich, Switzerland.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia K. Peterson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peterson, C.K., Pfirrmann, C.W.A. & Hodler, J. The development and implementation of an outcomes database for imaging-guided therapeutic musculoskeletal injections. Skeletal Radiol 43, 979–984 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1881-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-1881-y

Keywords

Navigation