Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An alternative injection technique for performing MR ankle arthrography: the lateral mortise approach

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study evaluates whether the recently described lateral mortise (LM) approach to therapeutic ankle injections can also be used to inject the ankle prior to magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) without impairing the evaluation of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL).

Materials and methods

An IRB-approved, retrospective review of ankle MRAs performed using the LM approach between April 2009 and April 2011 was conducted. The MRAs were independently evaluated by three musculoskeletal radiologists for: ATFL assessment (well assessed, limited or unable to assess), amount of fluid in the anterolateral soft tissues (none to large), and capsular distention (underdistended to overdistended). Patient age, gender, fluoroscopy time, injection location, degree of ankle arthritis, and ankle joint narrowing on radiographs were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using exact binomial confidence limits.

Results

Fifteen MRAs were successfully performed on 13 patients (mean age: 27 years, 11 male, 2 female). Mean fluoroscopic time was 39 s (range 9–108) and mean volume injected was 7 mL (range 5–9 mL). The ATFL was well assessed on all MRAs. A moderate to large amount of fluid was noted in the anterolateral soft tissues on 5 out of 15 MRAs. No ankle joints were underdistended, but 3 out of 15 were overdistended.

Conclusion

Since the ATFL is inferior to the location used for the LM injection, the interpretation of the ankle MRA, specifically ATFL evaluation, was not compromised in any patient. Therefore, the LM approach can be used as an alternative to the anteromedial approach for ankle MRA without sacrificing diagnostic quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Helgason JW, Chandnani VP. Magnetic resonance imaging arthrography of the ankle. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;9:286–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haage H. Die Arthrographie des Sprunggelenkes. Radiologe. 1967;7(5):137–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ala-Ketola L, Puranen J, Koivisto E, Puupera M. Arthrography in the diagnosis of ligament injuries and classification of ankle injuries. Radiology. 1977;125:63–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandnani VP, Harper MT, Ficke JR, et al. Chronic ankle instability: evaluation with MR arthrography, MR imaging, and stress radiography. Radiology. 1994;192:189–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spiegel PK, Staples OS. Arthrography of the ankle joint: problems in diagnosis of acute lateral ligament injuries. Radiology. 1975;114:587–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session: MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2002;22:1223–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J, Vienne P, Zanetti M. Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32:259–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox MG, Wright PR, Alford B, Patrie JT, Anderson MW. The lateral mortise approach for therapeutic ankle injections: an alternative to the anteromedial approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(5):1096–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodler J. Technical errors in MR arthrography. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:9–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moon J, Shim J, Suh J, Lee W. Radiographic predictability of cartilage damage in medial ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2188–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koivikko MP, Koskinen SK. Is subcutaneous local anesthesia in shoulder magnetic resonance arthrography necessary? Acta Radiol. 2007;48(7):741–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shortt CP, Morrison WB, Roberts CC, Deely DM, Gopez AG, Zoga AC. Shoulder, hip, and knee arthrography needle placement using fluoroscopic guidance: practice patterns of musculoskeletal radiologists in North America. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:377–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Depelteau H, Bureau N, Cardinal E, Aubin B, Brassard P. Arthrography of the shoulder: a simple fluoroscopically guided approach for targeting the rotator cuff interval. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:329–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Catalano O, Manfredi R, Vanzulli A, Tomei E, Napolitano M, Esposito A, et al. MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: modified posterior approach without imaging guidance. Radiology. 2007;242:550–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lohman M, Borrero C, Casagranda B, Rafiee B, Towers J. The posterior transtriceps approach for elbow arthrography: a forgotten technique? Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:513–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

No grants or conflict of interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael G. Fox.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, P.R., Fox, M.G., Alford, B. et al. An alternative injection technique for performing MR ankle arthrography: the lateral mortise approach. Skeletal Radiol 43, 27–33 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1740-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1740-2

Keywords

Navigation