Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study is to assess the elastic and anisotropic properties of normal calcaneal tendon in vivo by transient shear wave elastography (SWE).
Materials and methods
This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee. Eighty healthy subjects over 18 years of age were prospectively included. Data on the patients’ height, weight, sporting activities, and take-off foot were assessed. The thickness, width, and cross-sectional area of the calcaneal tendons were measured. The shear wave propagation velocity (Vmean) was measured by three radiologists on axial and sagittal SWE images at four different degrees of ankle flexion, enabling to calculate elasticity modulus (Emean), and relative anisotropy coefficient (A) values.
Results
In complete plantar flexion, Vmean was 6.8 ± 1.4 m.s−1 and 5.1 ± 0.8 m.s−1, respectively, on the sagittal and axial SWE image, resulting in an elastographic anisotropy A of 0.24 ± 0.16. The best interobserver correlation coefficient of Emean and Vmean was 0.43 and 0.46, respectively, in the sagittal SWE for complete plantar flexion. Vmean and Emean significantly increase when the tendon is stretched by ankle dorsiflexion. The maximal values in sagittal SWE were Vmean = 16.1 ± 0.7 m.s−1, Emean = 779.5 ± 57.1kPa and A = 0.63 ± 0.07.
Conclusions
SWE allows the elastic properties of the calcaneal tendon to be evaluated quantitatively in vivo, but interobserver reproducibility is questionable. It confirms the tendinous elastographic anisotropy and stiffness augmentation of stretched tendon.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Reeves ND. Adaptation of the tendon to mechanical usage. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2006;6(2):174–80.
Narici MV, Maganaris CN. Adaptability of elderly human muscles and tendons to increased loading. J Anat. 2006;208(4):433–43.
Jarvinen TA, Kannus P, Paavola M, Jarvinen TL, Jozsa L, Jarvinen M. Achilles tendon injuries. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13(2):150–5.
Jarvinen TA, Kannus P, Maffulli N, Khan KM. Achilles tendon disorders: etiology and epidemiology. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005;10(2):255–66.
Hess GW. Achilles tendon rupture: a review of etiology, population, anatomy, risk factors, and injury prevention. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010;3(1):29–32.
Jung HJ, Fisher MB, Woo SL. Role of biomechanics in the understanding of normal, injured, and healing ligaments and tendons. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2009;1(1):9.
Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Slauterbeck J. The mechanical properties of the human patellar tendon are correlated to its mass density and are independent of sex. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20(6):645–52.
Reeves ND, Maganaris CN, Narici MV. Effect of strength training on human patella tendon mechanical properties of older individuals. J Physiol. 2003;548(Pt 3):971–81.
Maganaris CN, Paul JP. In vivo human tendon mechanical properties. J Physiol. 1999;521(Pt 1):307–13.
Maganaris CN. Tensile properties of in vivo human tendinous tissue. J Biomech. 2002;35(8):1019–27.
Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Effects of different duration isometric contractions on tendon elasticity in human quadriceps muscles. J Physiol. 2001;536(Pt 2):649–55.
Sandrin L, Tanter M, Catheline S, Fink M. Shear modulus imaging with 2-D transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2002;49(4):426–35.
Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004;51(4):396–409.
Gennisson JL, Renier M, Catheline S, Barriere C, Bercoff J, Tanter M, et al. Acoustoelasticity in soft solids: assessment of the nonlinear shear modulus with the acoustic radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;122(6):3211–9.
Boisserie-Lacroix M. Elastography: an old concept for a new tool. J Radiol. 2007;88(5 Pt 1):625–6.
Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, Sigal-Zafrani B, Bercoff J, Deffieux T, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging–preliminary results. Radiology. 2010;256(1):297–303.
Bavu E, Gennisson JL, Couade M, Bercoff J, Mallet V, Fink M, et al. Noninvasive in vivo liver fibrosis evaluation using supersonic shear imaging: a clinical study on 113 hepatitis C virus patients. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(9):1361–73.
Aubry S, Risson JR, Barbier-Brion B, Tatu L, Vidal C, Kastler B. Transient elastography of calcaneal tendon: preliminary results and future prospects. J Radiol. 2011;92(5):421–7.
Arda K, Ciledag N, Aktas E, Aribas BK, Kose K. Quantitative assessment of normal soft-tissue elasticity using shear-wave ultrasound elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(3):532–6.
Abate M, Gravare Silbernagel K, Siljeholm C, Di Iorio A, De Amicis D, Salini V, et al. Pathogenesis of tendinopathies: inflammation or degeneration? Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(3):235.
Holmes GB, Lin J. Etiologic factors associated with symptomatic Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(11):952–9.
De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Smekal V, Reindl M, Klauser AS. Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy Achilles tendons. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(2):W134–138.
De Zordo T, Chhem R, Smekal V, Feuchtner G, Reindl M. Fink C, et al. Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic Achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Med; 2009.
Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description. Clin Radiol. 2009;64(12):1196–202.
Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Cimmino MA. Sonoelastography in the evaluation of painful Achilles tendon in amateur athletes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(3):373–8.
Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS. In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(3):427–35.
Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13(2):111–34.
Zimmer JE, Cost JR. Determination of the elastic constants of an unidirectional fiber composite using ultrasonic velocity measurements. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970;47:795–803.
Kuo PL, Li PC, Li ML. Elastic properties of tendon measured by two different approaches. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27(9):1275–84.
Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Mace E, Montaldo G, Fink M, Tanter M. Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36(5):789–801.
Maganaris CN, Narici MV, Maffulli N. Biomechanics of the Achilles tendon. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(20–22):1542–7.
Smith CW, Young IS, Kearney JN. Mechanical properties of tendons: changes with sterilization and preservation. J Biomech Eng. 1996;118(1):56–61.
Haut RC, Lancaster RL, DeCamp CE. Mechanical properties of the canine patellar tendon: some correlations with age and the content of collagen. J Biomech. 1992;25(2):163–73.
Woo SL, Ritter MA, Amiel D, Sanders TM, Gomez MA, Kuei SC, et al. The biomechanical and biochemical properties of swine tendons–long term effects of exercise on the digital extensors. Connect Tissue Res. 1980;7(3):177–83.
Tallon C, Maffulli N, Ewen SW. Ruptured Achilles tendons are significantly more degenerated than tendinopathic tendons. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(12):1983–90.
Khoury V, Cardinal E. "Tenomalacia": a new sonographic sign of tendinopathy? Eur Radiol. 2009;19(1):144–6.
Acknowledgments
We thank Frances Sheppard (Clinical Investigation Center of Besançon, Inserm CIT 808) for translating the manuscript into English, and Philippe Manzoni (University Hospital of Besançon) for technical support.
Conflict of interest declaration
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments of funding and grants
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aubry, S., Risson, JR., Kastler, A. et al. Biomechanical properties of the calcaneal tendon in vivo assessed by transient shear wave elastography. Skeletal Radiol 42, 1143–1150 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1649-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1649-9