Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 42, Issue 9, pp 1209–1214 | Cite as

Ultrasound of talocalcaneal coalition: retrospective study of 11 patients

  • Stefano BianchiEmail author
  • Douglas Hoffman
Article

Abstract

Objective

To present the ultrasound appearance of talocalcaneal coalitions (TCC).

Materials and methods

We present a retrospective review of 11 patients (8 women and 3 men, age range 17–58 years, mean age 35.3 years) in which ultrasound, the first imaging study carried out, detected a TCC that was not known or suspected clinically. Patients were subsequently examined by standard radiographs, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results

In 9 patients with fibrous coalition ultrasound showed a reduced joint space of the medial aspect of the anterior talocalcaneal joint associated with an irregular, pointed appearance of its outline. In 2 patients with osseous coalitions ultrasound revealed a smooth continuity of the hyperechoic bone surface between the medial talus and the substentaculum tali. The diagnosis was confirmed in 4 patients with CT and in 3 with MRI. In the remaining 4 patients standard radiographs were consistent with TCC.

Conclusion

Owing to its tomographic capabilities ultrasound can detect TCC. We suggest that study of the anterior subtalar joint should be a part of every ankle ultrasound examination as it can show a clinically unsuspected TCC. Confirmation of the coalition by CT or MRI is required in the preoperative assessment to better assess the type and extent of the congenital anomaly as well as the adjacent joints.

Keywords

Ultrasound Talocalcaneal coalition Ankle Sonography 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Newman JS, Newberg AH. Congenital tarsal coalition: multimodality evaluation with emphasis on CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 2000;20:321–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bianchi S, Martinoli C, Gaignot C, De Gautard R, Meyer JM. Ultrasound of the ankle: anatomy of the tendons, bursae, and ligaments. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2005;9:243–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Maeseneer M, Marcelis S, Jager T, et al. Sonography of the normal ankle: a target approach using skeletal reference points. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:487–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee MF, Chan PT, Chau LF, Yu KS. Tarsal tunnel syndrome caused by talocalcaneal coalition. J Clin Imaging. 2002;26:140–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morvan G, Brasseur J, Sans N. Superficial US of superficial bones. J Radiol. 2005;86:1892–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nagaoka M, Matsuzaki H. Ultrasonography in tarsal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1035–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Linklater J, Hayter CL, Vu D, Tse K. Anatomy of the subtalar joint and imaging of talo-calcaneal coalition. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:437–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stormont DM, Peterson HA. The relative incidence of tarsal coalition. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;181:28–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nalaboff KM, Schweitzer ME. MRI of tarsal coalition: frequency, distribution, and innovative signs. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66:14–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Staser J, Karmazyn B, Lubicky J. Radiographic diagnosis of posterior facet talocalcaneal coalition. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:79–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cass AD, Camasta CA. A review of tarsal coalition and pes planovalgus: clinical examination, diagnostic imaging, and surgical planning. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49:274–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korvin H. Coalitio talocalcaneal. Zeitschr Orthop Chir. 1934;60:105–10.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar SJ, Guille JT, Lee MS, Couto JC. Osseous and non-osseous coalition of the middle fact of the talocalcaneal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:529–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crim JR, Kjeldsberg KM. Radiographic diagnosis of tarsal coalition. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:323–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lateur LM, Van Hoe LR, Van Ghillewe KV, Gryspeerdt SS, Baert AL, Dereymaeker GE. Subtalar coalition: diagnosis with the C sign on lateral radiographs of the ankle. Radiology. 1994;193:847–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taniguchi A, Tanaka Y, Kadono K, Takakura Y, Kurumatani N. C sign for diagnosis of talocalcaneal coalition. Radiology. 2003;228:501–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown RR, Rosenberg ZS, Thornhill BA. The C sign: more specific for flatfoot deformity than subtalar coalition. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:84–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rozansky A, Varley E, Moor M, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ. A radiologic classification of talocalcaneal coalitions based on 3D reconstruction. J Child Orthop. 2010;4:129–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIM SA, Cabinet Imagerie MédicaleGenèveSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedics and Sports MedicineEssentia HealthDuluthUSA

Personalised recommendations