Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 195–201 | Cite as

Prediction of hip osteoporotic fractures from composite indices of femoral neck strength

  • Guan-Wu Li
  • Shi-Xin ChangEmail author
  • Zheng Xu
  • Yao Chen
  • Hong Bao
  • Xiao Shi
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

To clarify whether composite hip strength indices improve predictive ability for hip osteoporotic fractures independent of conventional bone mineral density (BMD).

Subjects and methods

Three hundred and eighty-two health controls and 43 women with hip fractures (aged 28.2–87.7 years, mean age 59.5±9.2 years) were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for femoral neck bone mineral density (FN_BMD) and proximal femur geometry parameters of hip, and composite hip strength indices (Compression strength index, Bending strength index, and Impact strength index). The association between the studied parameters and the fractures was modelled using multiple logistic regression, including age, height, weight, and menopausal status. Fracture-predicted probability was calculated for each predictor tested. ROC curve areas (AUCs) were calculated for the fracture status, having the calculated fracture-predicted probability as a test variable. AUCs were compared by the Hanley–McNeil test.

Results

Women with hip fractures had lower FN_BMD, composite hip strength indices, and longer hip axis length than controls, and no significant difference in femoral neck width. Logistic regression showed composite hip strength indices could predict hip fractures risk. To the same extent as FN BMD, Compression Strength Index (CSI) best predicted the risk for each fracture (AUC = 0.787 ± 0.028). When CSI was added to FN_BMD, there was a small but not statistically significant increase in AUC to 0.796 ± 0.027 (P = 0.9018).

Conclusion

Composite indices of femoral neck strength may be valuable in the assessment of the biomechanics of bone fragility; however, they do not appear to add diagnostic value to the simple measurement of BMD.

Keywords

Bone mineral density Bone strength Hip fracture Hip structural geometry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grant from the Foundation of Shanghai education commission, China (NO. 2010JW53). The authors would like to express their great appreciation to Zi-Ming Zhou, Qing-Jiao Zhang for their assistance in the recruitment of participants and editing help and Lei Zhou for hers advisory function in the statistical analysis. We wish to thank anonymous reviewers for comments that help us to improve the quality of our manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of Interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lyles KW, Schenck AP, Colón-Emeric CS. Hip and other osteoporotic fractures increase the risk of subsequent fractures in nursing home residents. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:1225–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xia WB, He SL, Xu L, et al. Rapidly increasing rates of hip fracture in Beijing, China. J Bone Miner Res. 2011. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.519.
  3. 3.
    Paschalis EP, Mendelsohn R, Boskey AL. Infrared assessment of bone quality: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2170–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li GW, Tang GY, Liu Y, Tang RB, Peng YF, Li W. MR spectroscopy and micro-CT in evaluation of osteoporosis model in rabbits: comparison with histopathology. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:923–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ishii S, Cauley JA, Greendale GA, Danielson ME, Safaei NN, Karlamangla A. Ethnic differences in composite indices of femoral neck strength. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:1381–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang H, Hu YQ, Zhang ZL. Age trends for hip geometry in Chinese men and women and the association with femoral neck fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:2513–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tuck SP, Rawlings DJ, Scane AC, et al. Femoral neck shaft angle in men with fragility fractures. J Osteoporos. 2011;2011:903726.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gao G, Zhang ZL, Zhang H, et al. Hip axis length changes in 10,554 males and females and the association with femoral neck fracture. J Clin Densitom. 2008;11:360–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karlamangla AS, Barrett-Connor E, Young J, Greendale GA. Hip fracture risk assessment using composite indices of femoral neck strength: the Rancho Bernardo study. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:62–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khalil N, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Strotmeyer ES, Greendale GA, et al. Menopausal bone changes and incident fractures in diabetic women: a cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:1367–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faulkner KG, Wacker WK, Barden HS, et al. Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:593–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang L, Peel N, Clowes JA, McCloskey EV, Eastell R. Use of DXA-based structural engineering models of the proximal femur to discriminate hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:33–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leslie WD, Pahlavan PS, Tsang JF, Lix LM. Prediction of hip and other osteoporotic fractures from hip geometry in a large clinical cohort. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1767–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu N, Liu YJ, Pei Y, et al. Evaluation of compressive strength index of the femoral neck in Caucasians and chinese. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010;87:324–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seeman E, Duan Y, Fong C, Edmonds J. Fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:120–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alonso CG, Curiel MD, Carranza FH, Cano RP, Peréz AD. Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:714–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jules J, Ashley JW, Feng X. Selective targeting of RANK signaling pathways as new therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2010;14:923–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dong SS, Liu XG, Chen Y, et al. Association analyses of RANKL/RANK/OPG gene polymorphisms with femoral neck compression strength index variation in Caucasians. Calcif Tissue Int. 2009;85:104–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jørgensen L, Crabtree NJ, Reeve J, Jacobsen BK. Ambulatory level and asymmetrical weight bearing after stroke affects bone loss in the upper and lower part of the femoral neck differently: bone adaptation after decreased mechanical loading. Bone. 2000;27:701–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nilsson M, Ohlsson C, Odén A, Mellström D, Lorentzon M. Increased physical activity is associated with enhanced development of peak bone mass in men: a five year longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res. 2012. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1549.

Copyright information

© ISS 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guan-Wu Li
    • 1
  • Shi-Xin Chang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zheng Xu
    • 2
  • Yao Chen
    • 1
  • Hong Bao
    • 1
  • Xiao Shi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyYueyang Hospital affiliated to ShangHai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Medical technologyXinzhuang Community Health Service CenterShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Department of GeriatricsYueyang Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations