Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 40, Issue 11, pp 1427–1434 | Cite as

Defining a reference range of acetabular inclination and center-edge angle of the hip in asymptomatic individuals

  • Lucy A. FowkesEmail author
  • Elia Petridou
  • Christopher Zagorski
  • Amanjot Karuppiah
  • Andoni P. Toms
Scientific Article

Abstract

Purpose

Acetabular morphology is an important predictor of the severity of osteoarthrosis and survival of hip prostheses but there is limited data on the normal range of acetabular measurements on plain radiographs. The aim of this project was to determine the statistically normal ranges of acetabular inclination (AI) and center-edge angle (CEA).

Method

One hundred coronal CT localizers (50 men and 50 women aged 20–30 years) were included in this study. All the patients underwent CT examination for thoracic or intra-abdominal indications. Patients with pelvic disease, fractures, history of serious trauma, or previous pelvic surgery were excluded. One pair of independent observers measured the AI and pelvic tilt (PT), and a further pair measured the center-edge angle (CEA), using electronic calipers on a high-resolution PACS workstation.

Results

AI and CEA measurements were obtained for 200 hips. There was very good intra-class correlation between the observers (r = 0.7–0.8). The mean AI was 38.8° (2SD 32.1–45.5°). That in men was 38.0° (2 SD 31.8–44.1°) and 39.6° (2 SD 32.7–46.8°) in women, which was statistically significantly different (p < 0.001). The mean CEA measurement for all patients was 36.3° (SD 13.8°), for men 37.7° (SD 10.8°) and for women 34.9° (SD 11.4°) with a statistically significant gender difference (p < 0.001). The mean pelvic tilt measurement (sacro-coccygeal-pubic symphysis) was 38.3 mm (2 SD 18.3–58.3 mm) with a significant gender difference (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results of this study define reference ranges of two common measures of acetabular morphology and confirm statistically significant differences between men and women.

Keywords

Acetabular inclination Center-edge angle Pelvic tilt 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1993;75(2):228–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giori NJ, Trousdale RT. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:263–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tönnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1999;81(12):1747–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wagner S, Hofstetter W, Chiquet M, Mainil-Varlet P, Stauffer E, Ganz R, et al. Early osteoarthritic changes of human femoral head cartilage subsequent to femoro-acetabular impingement. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage / OARS. 2003;11(7):508–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leunig M, Beck M, Dora C, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement: trigger for the development of coxarthrosis. Orthopade. 2006;35(1):77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):264–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Werlen S, Siebenrock KA. Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(4):782–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vossinakis IC, Georgiades G, Kafidas D, Hartofilakidis G. Unilateral hip osteoarthritis: can we predict the outcome of the other hip? Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37(10):911–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tannast M, Langlotz U, Siebenrock KA, Wiese M, Bernsmann K, Langlotz F. Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haenle M, Heitner A, Mittelmeier W, Barbano R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, et al. Assessment of cup position from plain radiographs: impact of pelvic tilting. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(1):29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1961;43(2):268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;83:1–132.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;407:241–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nagao Y, Aohi H, Ishii SJ, Masuda T, Beppu M. Radiographic method to measure the inclination angle of the acetabulum. J Orthop Sci Jap Orthop Assoc. 2008;13(1):62–71.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalteis TA, Handel M, Herbst B, Grifka J, Renkawitz T. In vitro investigation of the influence of pelvic tilt on acetabular cup alignment. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(1):152–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stulberg SD, Harris WH. 1974. Acetabular dysplasia and development of osteoarthritis of the hip. In The Hip: Proceeding of the Second Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby, pp. 83–93Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Armbuster TG, Guerra Jr J, Resnick D, Goergen TG, Feingold ML, Niwayama G, et al. The adult hip: an anatomic study. Part I: the bony landmarks. Radiology. 1978;128(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lembeck B, Mueller O, Reize P, Wuelker N. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(4):517–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tannast M, Murphy SB, Langlotz F, Anderson SE, Siebenrock KA. Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays–a comparison of six parameters. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35(3):149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tönnis D. Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop. 1976;119:39–47.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McGraw K, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Meth. 1996;1(1):30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Altman DG, 1990. Practical Statistics for Medical Research 1st ed., Chapman and Hall/CRCGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kojima A, Nakagawa T, Tohkura A. Simulation of acetabular coverage of femoral head using anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117(6–7):330–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sandring S, Healy J, Johnson D, Williams A, Ellis H (eds.) 2004. Pelvic girdle and lower limb. In Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 39th Ed. Churchill Livingstone, p 1430Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pederson DR, Lamb CA, Dolan MA, Ralston BS, Weinstein SL, Morcuende JA. Radiographic measurements in developmental dysplasia of the hip: reliability and validity of a digitizing program. J Ped Orthop. 2004;24(2):156–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Richards PJ, Pattison JM, Belcher J, DeCann RW, Anderson S, Wynn-Jones C. A new tilt on pelvic radiographs: a pilot study. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38(2):113–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, Burckhardt K, Langlotz F, Ganz R, et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:182–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anda S, Svenningsen S, Grontvedt T, Benum P. Pelvic inclination and spatial orientation of the acetabulum. A radiographic, computed tomographic and clinical investigation. Acta Radiol. 1990;31(4):389–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sanders G, Starvakas P. A technique for measuring pelvic tilt. Phys Ther. 1981;61(1):49–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H. Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;411:140–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crawford MB, Toms AP, Shepstone L. Defining normal vertebral angulation at the thoracolumbar junction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(1):W33–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucy A. Fowkes
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Elia Petridou
    • 1
  • Christopher Zagorski
    • 1
  • Amanjot Karuppiah
    • 1
  • Andoni P. Toms
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyNorfolk and Norwich University HospitalNorwich, NorfolkUK
  2. 2.Norwich Radiology AcademyCotman CentreNorfolkUK

Personalised recommendations