Defining a reference range of acetabular inclination and center-edge angle of the hip in asymptomatic individuals
- 406 Downloads
Acetabular morphology is an important predictor of the severity of osteoarthrosis and survival of hip prostheses but there is limited data on the normal range of acetabular measurements on plain radiographs. The aim of this project was to determine the statistically normal ranges of acetabular inclination (AI) and center-edge angle (CEA).
One hundred coronal CT localizers (50 men and 50 women aged 20–30 years) were included in this study. All the patients underwent CT examination for thoracic or intra-abdominal indications. Patients with pelvic disease, fractures, history of serious trauma, or previous pelvic surgery were excluded. One pair of independent observers measured the AI and pelvic tilt (PT), and a further pair measured the center-edge angle (CEA), using electronic calipers on a high-resolution PACS workstation.
AI and CEA measurements were obtained for 200 hips. There was very good intra-class correlation between the observers (r = 0.7–0.8). The mean AI was 38.8° (2SD 32.1–45.5°). That in men was 38.0° (2 SD 31.8–44.1°) and 39.6° (2 SD 32.7–46.8°) in women, which was statistically significantly different (p < 0.001). The mean CEA measurement for all patients was 36.3° (SD 13.8°), for men 37.7° (SD 10.8°) and for women 34.9° (SD 11.4°) with a statistically significant gender difference (p < 0.001). The mean pelvic tilt measurement (sacro-coccygeal-pubic symphysis) was 38.3 mm (2 SD 18.3–58.3 mm) with a significant gender difference (p < 0.001).
The results of this study define reference ranges of two common measures of acetabular morphology and confirm statistically significant differences between men and women.
KeywordsAcetabular inclination Center-edge angle Pelvic tilt
Conflict of interest
- 2.Giori NJ, Trousdale RT. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:263–9.Google Scholar
- 12.Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;83:1–132.Google Scholar
- 15.Nagao Y, Aohi H, Ishii SJ, Masuda T, Beppu M. Radiographic method to measure the inclination angle of the acetabulum. J Orthop Sci Jap Orthop Assoc. 2008;13(1):62–71.Google Scholar
- 17.Stulberg SD, Harris WH. 1974. Acetabular dysplasia and development of osteoarthritis of the hip. In The Hip: Proceeding of the Second Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby, pp. 83–93Google Scholar
- 21.Tönnis D. Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop. 1976;119:39–47.Google Scholar
- 23.Altman DG, 1990. Practical Statistics for Medical Research 1st ed., Chapman and Hall/CRCGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sandring S, Healy J, Johnson D, Williams A, Ellis H (eds.) 2004. Pelvic girdle and lower limb. In Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 39th Ed. Churchill Livingstone, p 1430Google Scholar