Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy of CT-guided joint aspiration in patients with suspected infection status post-total hip arthroplasty

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the accuracy of guided computed tomography aspiration in the detection of septic hip prosthesis before surgery.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-three patients (35 women and 28 men; age range, 29–86 years; mean age, 71 years) with clinically suspected septic hip prosthesis were prospectively studied with independent review board (IRB) approval. Volume and microbiological cultures of aspirated fluid and several computed tomography imaging findings such as periprosthetic fluid collections, prosthetic acetabular malposition, and heterotopic ossification were analyzed. All patients underwent revision surgery and infection was finally diagnosed in 33 patients.

Results

Statistical comparative analysis was performed comparing computed tomography aspiration and surgical findings (95% CI; level of significance at P = 0.05 two-sided) with 70% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 84% accuracy, 100% positive predictive value, and 75% negative predictive value. Using Fisher’s exact test, the presence of periprosthetic fluid collections (P = 0.001), prosthetic acetabular malposition (P = 0.025) and aspirated fluid volume (P = 0.009) were significantly higher in infected than in non-infected prostheses, whereas heterotopic ossification was not (P = 0.429).

Conclusion

Computed tomography aspiration is accurate to preoperatively diagnose septic hip prosthesis on the basis of volume and bacterial cultures of aspirated joint fluid. Furthermore, imaging findings such as periprosthetic fluid collections and prosthetic acetabular malposition strongly suggest infected prosthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, et al. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1619–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jover Sáenz A, Barcenilla Gaite F, Torres Puig Gros J, Mas Atance J, Garrido Calvo S, Porcel Pérez JM. Total prosthetic knee and hip joint infection. Descriptive epidemiology, therapeutics and evolution in a secondary hospital during ten years. An Med Interna. 2007;24:19–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton H, Jamieson J. Deep infection in total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2008;51:111–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tigges S, Stiles RG, Roberson JR. Appearance of septic hip prostheses on plain radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:377–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levitsky KA, Hozack WJ, Balderston RA, et al. Evaluation of the painful prosthetic joint. Relative value of bone scan, sedimentation rate, and joint aspiration. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:237–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrack RL, Harris WH. The value of aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:66–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tigges S, Stiles RG, Meli RJ, Roberson JR. Hip aspiration: a cost-effective and accurate method of evaluating the potentially infected hip prosthesis. Radiology. 1993;189:485–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lachiewicz PF, Rogers GD, Thomason HC. Aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty. Clinical and laboratory factors influencing attainment of a positive culture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:749–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fehring TK, Cohen B. Aspiration as a guide to sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:543–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX, Duncan CP. Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:672–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schweitzer ME, Deely DM, Beavis K, Gannon F. Does the use of lidocaine affect the culture of percutaneous bone biopsy specimens obtained to diagnose osteomyelitis? An in vitro and in vivo study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1201–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali F, Wilkinson JM, Cooper JR, et al. Accuracy of joint aspiration for the preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chew FS, Brown JH, Palmer WE, Kattapuram SV. CT-guided aspiration in potentially infected total hip replacements complicated by heterotopic bone. Eur J Radiol. 1995;20:72–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cyteval C, Hamm V, Sarrabère MP, Lopez FM, Maury P, Taourel P. Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis: CT imaging. Radiology. 2002;224:477–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacquier A, Champsaur P, Vidal V, et al. CT evaluation of total hip prosthesis infection. J Radiol. 2004;85:2005–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blake MP, Halasz SJ. The effects of X-ray contrast media on bacterial growth. Australas Radiol. 1995;39:10–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips WC, Kattapuram SV. Efficacy of preoperative hip aspiration performed in the radiology department. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(179):141–6.

  18. Mulcahy DM, Fenelon GC, McInerney DP. Aspiration arthrography of the hip joint. Its uses and limitations in revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:64–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Viceconti M, Lattanzi R, Antonietti B, et al. CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25:371–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sodemann B, Persson PE, Nilsson OS. Periarticular heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty for primary coxarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;(237):150–7.

  21. Maloney WJ, Krushell RJ, Jasty M, Harris WH. Incidence of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement: effect of the type of fixation of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:191–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martini F, Leichtle U, Lebherz C, et al. Postsurgical computed tomography of uncemented hip arthroplasty. Rofo. 2003;175:1413–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eisler T, Svensson O, Engström CF, et al. Ultrasound for diagnosis of infection in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:1010–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Holsbeeck MT, Eyler WR, Sherman LS, et al. Detection of infection in loosened hip prostheses: efficacy of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:381–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M, et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology. 2000;215:254–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sugimoto H, Hirose I, Miyaoka E, et al. Low-field-strength MR imaging of failed hip arthroplasty: association of femoral periprosthetic signal intensity with radiographic, surgical, and pathologic findings. Radiology. 2003;229:718–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Enrique Jorcano, Ernesto Espinoso, and Alex Budoy, TER/ATS, of the CT, Radiology Department. To Ines Villagrasa, for her assistance with CT coordination. To Donna Pringle and Jennifer Brickman, for their help with English proof-reading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier Tomas.

Additional information

This study won the Tecres Award attributed to the Best Poster at the 27th Annual Meeting of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society, 2008

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomas, X., Bori, G., Garcia, S. et al. Accuracy of CT-guided joint aspiration in patients with suspected infection status post-total hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 40, 57–64 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0940-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0940-2

Keywords

Navigation