Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 38, Issue 11, pp 1055–1062 | Cite as

The application of T1 and T2 relaxation time and magnetization transfer ratios to the early diagnosis of patellar cartilage osteoarthritis

Scientific Article

Abstract

Objectives

We compare the T1 and T2 relaxation times and magnetization transfer ratios (MTRs) of normal subjects and patients with osteoarthritis (OA) to evaluate the ability of these techniques to aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of OA.

Materials and methods

The knee joints in 11 normal volunteers and 40 patients with OA were prospectively evaluated using T1 relaxation times as measured using delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T2 relaxation times (multiple spin-echo sequence, T2 mapping), and MTRs. The OA patients were further categorized into mild, moderate, and severe OA.

Results

The mean T1 relaxation times of the four groups (normal, mild OA, moderate OA, and severe OA) were: 487.3 ± 27.7, 458.0 ± 55.9, 405.9 ± 57.3, and 357.9 ± 36.7 respectively (p <0.001). The mean T2 relaxation times of the four groups were: 37.8 ± 3.3, 44.0 ± 8.5, 50.9 ± 9.5, and 57.4 ± 4.8 respectively (p < 0.001). T1 relaxation time decreased and T2 relaxation time increased with worsening degeneration of patellar cartilage. The result of the covariance analysis showed that the covariate age had a significant influence on T2 relaxation time (p < 0.001). No significant differences between the normal and OA groups using MTR were noted.

Conclusion

T1 and T2 relaxation times are relatively sensitive to early degenerative changes in the patellar cartilage, whereas the MTR may have some limitations with regard to early detection of OA. In addition, The T1 and T2 relaxation times negatively correlate with each other, which is a novel finding.

Keywords

Osteoarthritis Knee patellar cartilage Magnetic resonance imaging 

References

  1. 1.
    Grushko G, Schneiderman R, Maroudas A. Some biochemical and biophysical parameters for the study of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: a comparison between the processes of ageing and degeneration in human hip cartilage. Connect Tiss Res. 1989;19:149–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lohmander LS. Articular cartilage and osteoarthrosis. The role of molecular markers to monitor breakdown, repair and disease. J Anat. 1994;184:477–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buckwalter JA, Martin J. Degenerative joint disease. Clin Symp. 1995;47:1–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bashir A, Gray ML, Burstein D. Gd-DTPA2- as a measure of cartilage degradation. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36(5):665–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bashir A, Gray ML, Hartke J, et al. Nondestructive imaging of human cartilage glycosaminoglycan concentration by MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41(5):857–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nieminen MT, Rieppo J, Toyras J, et al. T2 relaxation time reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: a comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46(3):487–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith HE, Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ, et al. Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14(1):50–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15(12):1833–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dardzinski BJ, Mosher TJ, Li S, et al. Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology. 1997;205(2):546–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xia Y. Magic-angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: a review. Invest Radiol. 2000;35(10):602–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lusse S, Claassen H, Gehrke T, et al. Evaluation of water content by spatially resolved transverse relaxation times of human articular cartilage. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;18(4):423–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mosher TJ, Chen Q, Smith MB. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of nanomelic chicken cartilage: effect of aggrecan depletion on cartilage T2. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11(10):709–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fragonas E, Mlynarik V, Jellus V, et al. Correlation between biochemical composition and magnetic resonance appearance of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998;6(1):24–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ, Smith MB. Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2—preliminary findings at 3 T. Radiology. 2000;214(1):259–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Watson PJ, Carpenter TA, Hall LD, et al. Cartilage swelling and loss in a spontaneous model of osteoarthritis visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1996;4(3):197–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gahunia HK, Lemaire C, Babyn PS, et al. Osteoarthritis in rhesus macaque knee joint: quantitative magnetic resonance imaging tissue characterization of articular cartilage. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(9):1747–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dunn TC, Lu Y, Jin H, et al. T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. Radiology. 2004;232(2):592–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Regatte RR, Akella SV, Lonner JH, et al. T1rho relaxation mapping in human osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage: comparison of T1rho with T2. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23(4):547–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bashir A, Gray ML, Burstein RD, et al. Glycosaminoglycan in articular cartilage: in vivo assessment with delayed Gd(DTPA)2-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1997;205(2):551–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mlynárik V, Trattnig S, Huber M, et al. The role of relaxation times in monitoring proteoglycan depletion in articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(4):497–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burstein D, Velyvis J, Scott KT, et al. Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)2-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45(1):36–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Breuseghem I. Ultrastructural MR imaging techniques of the knee articular cartilage: problems for routine clinical application. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(2):184–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lammentausta E, Kiviranta P, Nissi MJ, et al. T2 relaxation time and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human patellar cartilage at 1.5 T and 9.4 T: relationships with tissue mechanical properties. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(3):366–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tiderius CJ, Olsson LE, de Verdier H, et al. Gd-DTPA2-enhanced MRI of femoral knee cartilage: a dose-response study in healthy volunteers. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46(6):1067–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nissi MJ, Töyräs J, Laasanen MS, et al. Proteoglycan and collagen sensitive MRI evaluation of normal and degenerated articular cartilage. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(3):557–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Palmieri F, De Keyzer F, Maes F, et al. Magnetization transfer analysis of cartilage repair tissue: a preliminary study. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35(12):903–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stanisz GJ, Odrobina EE, Pun J, et al. T1, T2 relaxation time and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3 T. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54(3):507–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martirosian P, Boss A, Deimling M. Systematic variation of off-resonance prepulses for clinical magnetization transfer contrast imaging at 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 tesla. Invest Radiol. 2008;43(1):16–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Regatte RR, Akella SV, Reddy R. Depth-dependent proton magnetization transfer in articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22(2):318–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Petersen EF, Fishbein KW, Laouar L, et al. Ex vivo magnetic resonance microscopy of an osteochondral transfer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:603–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Laurent D, Wasvary J, Yin Jin, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of articular cartilage in the goat knee with magnetization transfer imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;19(10):1279–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyShanghai No.6 People’s Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations