Abstract
Objective
With digital radiography development, information technology (IT) companies have developed specific software for templating procedures, requiring individual magnification assessments for each patient. The aim of this study was to determine the mean magnification factor of digital radiographs and to evaluate the possibility of using the mean magnification factor or clinical information in templating.
Materials and methods
We retrospectively evaluated 100 primary total hip arthroplasty digital radiographs using the femoral head prosthesis as a calliper to determinate the mean magnification factor. Working on the assumption that altitude of the hip during radiograph is decisive in modification of magnification factors, we also looked for a correlation between weight, body mass index (BMI), altitude and magnification factor.
Results
The magnification factor was 126% (121–130%). A relationship was found between magnification factor (Mf) and weight (Mf = 7.10−4× weight (kg) + 1.21), but not BMI. In 98% of cases, if the weight-correlated formula is used, the sizing is correct or the error is ± 1 mm. With the mean method the sizing is correct or within 1 mm in only 78.2% of cases.
Conclusion
Levels of accuracy for the mean magnification factor and the weight-correlated formula are not as high as individual assessments using a calliper; however, they could be used in everyday practice where individual magnification factors have not been calculated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bould M, Barnard S, Learmonth ID, Cunningham JL, Hardy JR. Digital image analysis: improving accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic measurement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999;14:434–7.
Oddy MJ, Jones MJ, Pendegrass CJ, Pilling JR, Wimhurst JA. Assessment of reproducibility and accuracy in templating hybrid total hip arthroplasty using digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:581–5.
Bono JV. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86 (Suppl 2):118–22.
Della Valle AG, Padgett DE, Salvati EA. Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty (review). J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13:455–62.
Davila JA, Kransdorf MJ, Duffy GP. Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:390–3.
The B, Diercks RL, van Ooijen PM, van Horn JR. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:78–84.
Wimsey S, Pickard R, Shaw G. Accurate scaling of digital radiographs of the pelvis. A prospective trial of two methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1508–12.
Conn KS, Clarke MT, Hallett JP. A simple guide to determine the magnification of radiographs and to improve the accuracy of preoperative templating. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:269–72.
The B, Diercks RL, Stewart RE, van Ooijen PM, van Horn JR. Digital correction of magnification in pelvic x rays for preoperative planning of hip joint replacements: theoretical development and clinical results of a new protocol. Med Phys. 2005;32:2580–9.
Knight JL, Atwater RD. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty. 1992;7 (Suppl):403–9.
Linclau L, Dokter G, Peene P. Radiological aspects in preoperative planning and postoperative assessment of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 1993;59:163–7.
The B, Kootstra JW, Hosman AH, Verdonschot N, Gerritsma CL, Diercks RL. Comparison of techniques for correction of magnification of pelvic X-rays for hip surgery planning. J Digit Imaging. 2007;20:329–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Descamps, S., Livesey, C. & Learmonth, I. Determination of digitised radiograph magnification factors for pre-operative templating in hip prosthesis surgery. Skeletal Radiol 39, 273–277 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0732-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0732-8