Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Twenty-degree-tilt radiography for evaluation of lateral humeral condylar fracture in children

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of ‘20°-tilt anteroposterior (A-P) radiography’ in the assessment of lateral condylar fractures of the distal humerus.

Materials and methods

Eighteen children with lateral humeral condylar fractures were studied. Every child underwent conventional A-P and lateral radiography, and six children underwent multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). For the investigation of 20°-tilt radiography, ten children with lateral humeral condylar fractures had conventional and 20°-tilt A-P and lateral radiography both preoperatively and postoperatively. Fragment dislocation was measured at the lateral and medial margins of the fracture on both the conventional A-P and 20°-tilt A-P radiographs.

Results

The lateral condylar fragment was triangular and was most prominent posteriorly. The fracture line was typically tilted approximately 20° to a reference line perpendicular to the long axis of the humerus in the lateral view. The extent of dislocation at the lateral and medial margins of the fracture site by 20°-tilt A-P radiography (9.3 ± 3.6 mm and 5.6 ± 2.5 mm) was significantly wider than that measured by the conventional method (6.8 ± 4.1 mm and 2.0 ± 1.5 mm ), which may influence treatment.

Conclusion

Twenty-degree-tilt A-P radiography may more precisely demonstrate fragment dislocation than standard radiographs and may influence patient treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blount WP. The treatment of elbow injuries in children. Trauma 1963; 7: 1–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Conner AN, Smith MGH. Displaced fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1963; 45: 722–726.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flynn JC, Richards JF. Non-union of minimally displaced fractures of the lateral condyle of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971; 53: 1096–1111.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bast SC, Hoffer MM, Aval S. Nonoperative treatment for minimally and nondisplaced lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1998; 18: 448–450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Finnbogason T, Karlsson G, Lindberg L, Mortensson W. Nondisplaced and minimally displaced fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children: a prospective radiographic investigation of fracture stability. J Pediatr Orthop 1995; 15: 422–425.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Flynn JC, Richards JF, Saltzman RI. Prevention and treatment of non-union of slightly displaced fractures of the lateral humeral condyle in children. An end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975; 57: 1087–1092.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mintzer CM, Water PM, Brown DJ, Kasser JR. Percutaneous pinning in the treatment of displaced lateral condyle fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1994; 14: 462–465.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamegaya M, Shinohara Y, Kurokawa M, Ogata S. Assessment of stability in children’s minimally displaced lateral humeral condyle fracture by magnetic resonance imaging. J Pediatr Orthop 1999; 19: 570–572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideaki Imada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Imada, H., Tanaka, R., Itoh, Y. et al. Twenty-degree-tilt radiography for evaluation of lateral humeral condylar fracture in children. Skeletal Radiol 39, 267–272 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0708-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0708-8

Keywords

Navigation