Skip to main content

Fast MR arthrography using VIBE sequences to evaluate the rotator cuff

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate if short volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences can be used as a substitute for T1-weighted with fat saturation (T1-FS) sequences when performing magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography to diagnose rotator cuff tears.

Materials and methods

Eighty-two patients underwent direct MR arthrography of the shoulder joint using VIBE (acquisition time of 13 s) and T1-FS (acquisition time of 5 min) sequences in the axial and paracoronal plane on a 1.0-T MR unit. Two radiologists scored rotator cuff tendons on VIBE and T1-FS images separately as normal, small/large partial thickness and full thickness tears with or without geyser sign. T1-FS sequences were considered the gold standard. Surgical correlation was available in a small sample.

Results

Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of VIBE were greater than 92% for large articular-sided partial thickness and full thickness tears. For detecting fraying and articular-sided small partial thickness tears, these parameters were 55%, 94%, 94%, and 57%, respectively. The simple kappa value was 0.76, and the weighted kappa value was 0.86 for agreement between T1-FS and VIBE scores. All large partial and full thickness tears at surgery were correctly diagnosed using VIBE or T1-FS MR images.

Conclusion

Fast MR arthrography of the shoulder joint using VIBE sequences showed good concordance with the classically used T1-FS sequences for the appearance of the rotator cuff, in particular for large articular-sided partial thickness tears and for full thickness tears. Due to its very short acquisition time, VIBE may be especially useful when performing MR arthrography in claustrophobic patients or patients with a painful shoulder.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Chung CB, Corrente L, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the shoulder. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004;2: 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meister K, Thesing J, Montgomery WJ, Indelicato PA, Walczak S, Fontenot W. MR arthrography of partial thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33: 136–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vanhoenacker P, Vanhoenacker F, Crevits I, Simons P, Van Dyck P. MR arthrography of the rotator cuff and capsulolabral complex. JBR-BTR 2000;83: 313–318.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sahin G, Demirtas M. An overview of MR arthrography with emphasis on the current technique and applicational hints and tips. Eur J Radiol 2006;6: 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Rotator cuff: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR arthrography. Radiology 1993;9: 683–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morag Y, Jacobson JA, Miller B, De Maeseneer M, Girish G, Jamadar D. MR imaging of rotator cuff injury: what the clinician needs to know. Radiographics 2006;26: 1045–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Magee T, Williams D, Mani N. Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most? Am J Roentgenol 2004;183: 969–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Andreisek G, Froehlich JM, Hodler J, et al. Direct MR arthrography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Signal dependence on gadolinium and iodine concentrations—Phantom Study. Radiology 2008;247: 706–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waldt S, Bruegel M, Mueller D, et al. Rotator cuff tears: assessment with MR arthrography in 275 patients with arthroscopic correlation. Eur Radiol 2007;17: 491–498.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellman H. Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop 1990;254: 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33: 159–174.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 1973;33: 613–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999;212: 876–884.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kataoka M, Ueda H, Koyama T, et al. Contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination compared with spin-echo T1-weighted imaging of head and neck tumors. AJR 2005;184: 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wetzel SG, Johnson G, Tan AG, et al. Three-dimensional, T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the brain with a volumetric interpolated examination. AJNR 2002;6/7: 995–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU, et al. Three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold MR imaging for whole-body tumor staging in less than 15 minutes: a feasibility study. AJR 2002;179: 445–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mermuys KP, Vanhoenacker PK, Chappel P, Van Hoe L. Three-dimensional venography of the brain with a volumetric interpolated sequence. Radiology 2005;234: 901–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82: 498–504.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lecouvet FE, Simoni P, Koutaïssoff S, Vande Berg BC, Malgehm J, Dubuc JE. Multidetector spiral CT arthrography of the shoulder. Clinical applications and limits, with MR arthrography and arthroscopic correlations. Eur J Radiol 2008;68: 120–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ganguly A, Gold GE, Butts Pauly K, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the relaxivity effects of iodine on GD-DTPA enhanced MR arthrography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25: 1219–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jacobson JA, Lin J, Jamadar DA, Hayes CW. Aids to successful shoulder arthrography performed with a fluoroscopically guided anterior approach. Radiographics 2003;23: 373–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsen FA 3rd. Clinical practice. Rotator-cuff failure. N Engl J Med 2008;358: 2138–2147.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saleem AM, Lee JK, Novak LM. Usefulness of the abduction and external rotation views in shoulder MR arthrography. AJR 2008;191: 1024–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Magee T. Can isotropic fast gradient echo imaging be substituted for conventional T1-weighted sequences in shoulder MR arthrography at 3 Tesla? J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26: 118–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee MJ, Motamedi K, Chow K, Seeger LL. Gradient-recalled echo sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating the labrum. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37: 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, Schmid M, Hilfiker PR, Hodler J, Debatin JF. Virtual MR arthroscopy: new insights into joint morphology. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;6: 757–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan E. Vandevenne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vandevenne, J.E., Vanhoenacker, F., Mahachie John, J.M. et al. Fast MR arthrography using VIBE sequences to evaluate the rotator cuff. Skeletal Radiol 38, 669–674 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0677-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0677-y

Keywords

  • MR arthrography
  • Shoulder joint
  • Rotator cuff
  • Gradient echo sequence