Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to assess the utility of MRI in diagnosing injury to the first interosseous cuneometatarsal (Lisfranc) ligament and to additionally determine the associated patterns of traumatic soft tissue and osseous injury.
Materials and methods
Fifteen patients (16 feet) who were referred for MRI evaluation of the Lisfranc ligament, and had operative exploration or examination under anesthesia, were included for analysis. Standard non-contrast MRI foot imaging was performed in all cases. Evaluation of the following components was performed: the dorsal and plantar bundles of the Lisfranc ligament, the plantar tarsal metatarsal ligaments, soft tissue edema and fluid, and bone marrow edema and fractures. Surgical reports were regarded as the reference standard in all cases.
Results
Seven of 10 cases of grade 3 Lisfranc ligament injuries at surgery were correctly graded at MRI. No cases of surgically proven complete Lisfranc ligament tears (grade 3) were interpreted as normal at MRI. All Lisfranc ligament sprains (grade 2 or 3) at surgery were detected at MRI. Two of six cases reported as grade 1 injuries at MRI were normal at surgery. No cases of surgically proven normal or sprained Lisfranc ligaments were interpreted as grade 3 tears on MRI. Four of six of our cases of normal or sprained Lisfranc ligaments demonstrated fractures; while the minority of complete Lisfranc ligament tears (3/10) contained fractures.
Conclusion
MRI is reasonably accurate at detecting traumatic injury to the Lisfranc ligament. However, in clinically suspected cases of traumatic Lisfranc ligament injury, true positive rate for sprain is low.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vuori JP, Aro HT. Lisfranc joint injuries: trauma mechanisms and associated injuries. The Journal of Trauma. 1993; 35(1): 40–45.
Aronow MS. Treatment of the missed Lisfranc injury. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006; 11(1): 127–142. ix.
Peicha G, Labovitz J, Seibert FJ, Grechenig W, Weiglein A, Preidler KW, et al. The anatomy of the joint as a risk factor for Lisfranc dislocation and fracture-dislocation. An anatomical and radiological case control study. The J Bone Jt Surg 2002; 84(7): 981–985.
Nunley JA, Vertullo CJ. Classification, investigation, and management of midfoot sprains: Lisfranc injuries in the athlete. The Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30(6): 871–878.
Norfray JF, Geline RA, Steinberg RI, Galinski AW, Gilula LA. Subtleties of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations. Ajr. 1981; 137(6): 1151–1156.
Preidler KW, Wang YC, Brossmann J, Trudell D, Daenen B, Resnick D. Tarsometatarsal joint: anatomic details on MR images. Radiology. 1996; 199(3): 733–736.
Hunt SA, Ropiak C, Tejwani NC. Lisfranc joint injuries: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthop. (Belle Mead, NJ. 2006; 35(8): 376–385.
Coss HS, Manos RE, Buoncristiani A, Mills WJ. Abduction stress and AP weightbearing radiography of purely ligamentous injury in the tarsometatarsal joint. Foot Ankle Int. 1998; 19(8): 537–541.
Potter HG, Deland JT, Gusmer PB, Carson E, Warren RF. Magnetic resonance imaging of the Lisfranc ligament of the foot. Foot Ankle Int/American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [and] Swiss Foot and Ankle Society. 1998; 19(7): 438–446.
Preidler KW, Brossmann J, Daenen B, Goodwin D, Schweitzer M, Resnick D. MR imaging of the tarsometatarsal joint: analysis of injuries in 11 patients. Ajr. 1996; 167(5): 1217–1222.
Shapiro MS, Wascher DC, Finerman GA. Rupture of Lisfranc's ligament in athletes. The Am J Sports Med. 1994; 22(5): 687–691.
Lee CA, Birkedal JP, Dickerson EA, Vieta PA Jr., Webb LX, Teasdall RD. Stabilization of Lisfranc joint injuries: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int/American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [and] Swiss Foot and Ankle Society. 2004; 25(5): 365–370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacMahon, P.J., Dheer, S., Raikin, S.M. et al. MRI of injuries to the first interosseous cuneometatarsal (Lisfranc) ligament. Skeletal Radiol 38, 255–260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0613-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0613-6