Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between plain-film radiographic patterns and clinicopathologic variables in AJCC stage II osteosarcoma

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

In this retrospective study, we assessed the plain-film radiographic patterns of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II osteosarcoma and analyzed the relationship between these patterns and clinicopathologic variables.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 347 patients with AJCC stage II osteosarcoma who were treated at our institute. Patients were divided into three groups based on radiographic patterns, i.e., osteoblastic, osteolytic, and mixed. Fisher’s exact chi-square test was performed to analyze correlations between radiographic patterns and clinicopathological variables.

Results

One hundred and eighty-eight patients had an osteoblastic tumor, 101 had an osteolytic tumor, and 58 had a mixed tumor. Tumors with an osteoblastic pattern showed a tendency to have the following characteristics: AJCC stage II-B, osteoblastic or chondroblastic subtype, and no pathologic fracture. Conversely, osteolytic tumors were frequently of AJCC stage II-A, had a fibroblastic or rare subtype, and were associated with a pathologic fracture. Finally, mixed tumors were frequently found in men. No survival difference was found according to radiographic pattern.

Conclusions

Plain-film radiographic patterns were found to be related with clinicopathological features. We believe that it could be used to provide valuable information for treatment decision-making in cases of high-grade extremity osteosarcoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saifuddin A. The accuracy of imaging in the local staging of appendicular osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 2002; 31: 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy WA Jr. Imaging bone tumors in the 1990s. Cancer 1991; 67: 1169–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dahlin DC, Coventry MB. Osteogenic sarcoma. A study of six hundred cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967; 49: 101–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suresh S, Saifuddin A. Radiological appearances of appendicular osteosarcoma: a comprehensive pictorial review. Clin Radiol 2007; 62: 314–323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim MS, Cho WH, Song WS, Lee SY, Jeon DG. Time dependency of prognostic factors in patients with stage II osteosarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 463: 157–165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosen G, Marcove RC, Huvos AG, et al. Primary osteogenic sarcoma: eight-year experience with adjuvant chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1983; 106(Suppl): 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. deSantos LA, Edeiken B. Purely lytic osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 1982; 9: 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sundaram M, Totty WG, Kyriakos M, McDonald DJ, Merkel K. Imaging findings in pseudocystic osteosarcoma. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 783–788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawai A, Huvos AG, Meyers PA, Healey JH. Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. oncologic results of 40 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 348: 196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeon DG, Lee SY, Cho WH, Song WS, Park JH. Primary osteosarcoma in patients older than 40 years of age. J Korean Med Sci 2006; 21: 715–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Donati D, Martini A, Picci P, Campanacci M. Osteoblastoma-like osteosarcoma. The rizzoli institute experience. Mod Pathol 1993; 6: 707–716.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshida H, Yumoto T, Minamizaki T. Osteosarcoma with features mimicking malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1992; 421: 229–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Okada K, Hasegawa T, Nishida J, et al. Osteosarcomas after the age of 50: a clinicopathologic study of 64 cases—an experience in northern Japan. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11: 998–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark JL, Unni KK, Dahlin DC, Devine KD. Osteosarcoma of the jaw. Cancer 1983; 51: 2311–2316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Andresen KJ, Sundaram M, Unni KK, Sim FH. Imaging features of low-grade central osteosarcoma of the long bones and pelvis. Skeletal Radiol 2004; 33: 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphey MD, wan Jaovisidha S, Temple HT, Gannon FH, Jelinek JS, Malawer MM. Telangiectatic osteosarcoma: radiologic–pathologic comparison. Radiology 2003; 229: 545–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Edeiken J, Raymond AK, Ayala AG, Benjamin RS, Murray JA, Carrasco HC. Small-cell osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 1987; 16: 621–628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakajima H, Sim FH, Bond JR, Unni KK. Small cell osteosarcoma of bone. Review of 72 cases. Cancer 1997; 79: 2095–2106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ilaslan H, Sundaram M, Unni KK, Shives TC. Primary vertebral osteosarcoma: Imaging findings. Radiology 2004; 230: 697–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haworth JM, Watt I, Park WM, Roylance J. Diaphyseal osteosarcoma. Br J Radiol 1981; 54: 932–938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dae-Geun Jeon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, M.S., Lee, SY., Cho, W.H. et al. Relationships between plain-film radiographic patterns and clinicopathologic variables in AJCC stage II osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 37, 997–1001 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0536-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0536-2

Keywords

Navigation