Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of cartilage thickness with radiologic grade of knee osteoarthritis

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare joint space width (JSW) measurements obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a semi-automated computer algorithm to the Kellgren and Lawrence grading of osteoarthritis (OA).

Materials and methods

Three hundred and six patients (234 female, 72 male) with a mean age of 56.7 years (range 31–81 years) underwent MRI of their knees with a fast oblique spiral spoiled gradient (SPGR) sequence. A board-certified musculoskeletal radiologist graded the OA of all the patients in accordance with the Kellgren and Lawrence OA scale. A previously validated computer algorithm was used to determine the minimum JSW for both the tibiofemoral joint and the patellofemoral joint. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Student–Newman–Kuels post-hoc test was used to determine if there were differences in JSW as a function of OA grade.

Results

The radiologic grade of OA was inversely associated with the JSW. In the medial compartment the JSW did not change significantly between grade 1 and grade 2, but there was a significant decrease in JSW between grade 0 (normal) and grade 1 and for each OA grade above grade 2. In the lateral compartment no statistical differences were found till grade 2, while grade 3 was found to be statistically different from the previous one. The number of patients with a grade 4 patellofemoral OA was too low for the statistical significance to be assessed. In the patellofemoral joint the JSW did not change significantly until grade 2, while a statistically significant reduction was found for both grade 3 and grade 4.

Conclusion

This study showed that an inverse non-linear relationship exists between radiologic grade and JSW. The relationship differs for the tibiofemoral and the patellofemoral joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kellgren J, Lawrence J. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957; 16: 494–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. 1961. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 389: 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunther KP, Sun T. Reliability of radiographic assessment in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 239–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Agnesi F, Amrami KK, Frigo C, Kaufman KR. Semiautomated digital analysis of knee joint space width using MRI images. Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36: 437–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buckland-Wright JC, MacFarlane DG, Williams SA, Ward RJ. Accuracy and precision of joint space width measurements in standard and macro-radiographs of osteoarthritic knees. Ann Rheum Dis 1995; 54: 872–880.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Setton LA, Mow VC, Muller FJ, Pita JC, Howell DS. Mechanical properties of canine articular cartilage are significantly altered following transection of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res 1994; 12: 451–463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baysal O, Baysal T, Alkan A, Altay Z, Yologlu S. Comparison of MRI graded cartilage and MRI based volume measurement in knee osteoarthritis. Swiss Med Wkly 2004; 134: 283–288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Forbes A, Wolfe R. Comparison of tibial cartilage volume and radiologic grade of the tibiofemoral joint. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 682–688.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dashtu M, Wulka AE, Geso M, Davis SR, Stuckley S, Cicuttini FM. Relationship between the area of the cartilage shown on the magnetic resonance imaging middle-slice image of the medial and lateral tibial cartilage volume and grade of osteoarthritis over time. Scand J Rheumatol 2004; 33: 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schipplein OD, Andriacchi T. Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. J Orthop Res 1991; 9: 113–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Uri DS, Dalinka MK. Imaging of arthropathies. Crystal disease. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 34: 359–374.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Preidler KW, Resnick D. Imaging of osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 34: 259–271.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uebelhart D, Thonar EJ, Delmas PD, Chantraine A, Vignon E. Effects of oral chondroitin sulfate on the progression of knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998; 6 [Suppl A]: 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter DH, Lo GH, Gale D, Grainger AJ, Guermazi A, Conaghan PG. The development and reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI: BLOKS (Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 206–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S et al. Whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004; 12: 177–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Kathie Bernhardt and Christine Hughes for their work on this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenton R. Kaufman.

Additional information

This study was supported by National Institutes Of Health (NIH) grant R01 AR48768.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agnesi, F., Amrami, K.K., Frigo, C.A. et al. Comparison of cartilage thickness with radiologic grade of knee osteoarthritis. Skeletal Radiol 37, 639–643 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0483-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0483-y

Keywords

Navigation