Advertisement

Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 535–539 | Cite as

The radiographic acromiohumeral interval is affected by arm and radiographic beam position

  • Edward V. Fehringer
  • Charles E. Rosipal
  • David A. Rhodes
  • Anthony J. Lauder
  • Susan E. Puumala
  • Connie A. Feschuk
  • Matthew A. Mormino
  • David E. Hartigan
Scientific Article

Abstract

Objective

The objective was to determine whether arm and radiographic beam positional changes affect the acromiohumeral interval (AHI) in radiographs of healthy shoulders.

Materials and methods

Controlling for participant’s height and position as well as radiographic beam height and angle, from 30 right shoulders of right-handed males without shoulder problems four antero-posterior (AP) radiographic views each were obtained in defined positions. Three independent, blinded physicians measured the AHI to the nearest millimeter in 120 randomized radiographs. Mean differences between measurements were calculated, along with a 95% confidence interval.

Results

Controlling for observer effect, there was a significant difference between AHI measurements on different views (p < 0.01). All pair-wise differences were statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (all p values < 0.01).

Conclusions

Even in healthy shoulders, small changes in arm position and radiographic beam orientation affect the AHI in radiographs.

Keywords

Shoulder Rotator cuff Acromiohumeral interval Radiographs 

References

  1. 1.
    Lashgari CJ, Yamaguchi K. Natural history and nonsurgical treatment of rotator cuff disorders. In: Norris TR, ed. Orthopaedic knowledge update: shoulder and elbow 2. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lippitt SB, Matsen III FA. Mechanisms of glenohumeral joint stability. Clin Orthop 1993; 291: 20–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weiner D, Macnab I. Superior migration of the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1970; 52: 524–527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, Soslowsky LJ, Mow VC. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med 1991; 10: 823–838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golding FC. The shoulder: the forgotten joint. Br J Radiol 1962; 35: 149–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petersson CJ, Redlund-Johnell I. The subacromial space in normal shoulder radiographs. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55: 57–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cotton RE, Rideout DF. Tears of the humeral rotator cuff: radiological and pathological necropsy survey. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1964; 46: 314–328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Sex specific differences of subacromial space width during abduction, with and without muscular activity, and correlation with anthropometric variables. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 129–135.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lehtinen JT, Belt EA, Lyback CO, et al. Subacromial space in the rheumatoid shoulder: a radiographic 15-year follow up study of 148 shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000; 9: 183–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flatow E, Soslowsky LJ, Ticker JB, et al. Excursion of the rotator cuff under the acromion. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: 779–787.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the width of the subacromial space in healthy subjects and patients with impingement syndrome. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 1081–1086.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420–428.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward V. Fehringer
    • 1
  • Charles E. Rosipal
    • 1
  • David A. Rhodes
    • 1
  • Anthony J. Lauder
    • 1
  • Susan E. Puumala
    • 2
  • Connie A. Feschuk
    • 1
  • Matthew A. Mormino
    • 1
  • David E. Hartigan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and RehabilitationUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Preventive and Societal MedicineNebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations