Skip to main content
Log in

Bipartite hallucal sesamoid bones: relationship with hallux valgus and metatarsal index

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective was to relate the incidence of the partition of the hallucal sesamoid bones to the size of the first metatarsal and the hallux valgus deformity.

Materials and Methods

In a sample of 474 radiographs, the frequency of appearance of bipartite sesamoids was studied. The length and relative protrusion of the first metatarsal, and the hallux abductus angle, were measured and compared between the feet with and without sesamoid partition.

Results

The results showed that 14.6% of the feet studied had at least one partite sesamoid, that the sesamoid most frequently divided was the medial, and that unilateral partition was the most common. No difference was found in the incidence of partite sesamoids between men and women, or between left and right feet.

Conclusion

Protrusion and length of the first metatarsal are greater in feet with partite sesamoids than in feet without this condition. A significantly higher incidence of bipartite medial sesamoid was obtained in feet with hallux valgus compared with normal feet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarrafian SK. Anatomy of the foot and ankle: descriptive, topographic, functional, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jahss MH. The sesamoids of the hallux. Clin Orthop 1981; 157: 88–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Inge GAL, Ferguson AB. Surgery of the sesamoid bones of the great toe. An anatomic and clinical study with a report of forty-one cases. Arch Surg 1933; 27: 466–489.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weil LS, Hill M. Bipartite tibial sesamoid and hallux abducto valgus deformity: a previously unreported correlation. J Foot Surg 1992; 31: 104–111.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yildirim Y, Saygi B. Congenital absence of the lateral sesamoid. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2006; 96: 78–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frankel JP, Harrington J. Symptomatic bipartite sesamoids. J Foot Surg 1990; 29: 318–323.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scranton PE, Rutkowski R. Anatomic variations in the first ray. II. Disorders of the sesamoids. Clin Orthop 1980; 151: 256–264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carpintero P, Mesa M, García E, Sánchez G, Carpintero A. Pie cavo y sesamoideo bipartito. Rev Ortop Traum 1991; 35: 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hardy RH, Clapham JC. Observations on hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg 1951; 33B: 376–391.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heden RI, Sorto LA. The buckle point and the metatarsal protrusion’s relationship to hallux valgus. J Am Podiatr Assoc 1981; 71: 200–208.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Duke H, Newman LM, Bruskoff BL, Daniels R. Relative metatarsal length patterns in hallux abducto valgus. J Am Podiatr Assoc 1982; 72: 1–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Read L. The structural abnormality in hallux valgus: is it the same in all age groups? J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65B: 367.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Kumai T, Samoto N, Tamai S. Radiographic analysis of hallux valgus. A two-dimensional coordinate system. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77A: 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bryant A, Tinley P, Singer K. Comparison of radiographic measurements in normal, hallux valgus, and hallux limitus feet. J Foot Ankle Surg 2000; 39: 39–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mancuso JE, Abramow SP, Landsman MJ, Waldman M, Carioscia M. The zero-plus first metatarsal and its relationship to bunion deformity. J Foot Ankle Surg 2003; 42: 319–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soames RW. Sistema esquelético. In: Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ, editors. Anatomía de Gray, vol I, 38th ed. Madrid: Harcourt; 1998: 425–736.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tachdjian MO. The child’s foot. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lelièvre J, Lelièvre JF. Patología del pie, 4th ed. Barcelona: Masson, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Piqué C, Maled I, Arabi J, Vila J. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nilsonne H. Hallux rigidus and its treatment. Acta Orthop Scand 1930; 1: 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Munuera PV, Polo J, Rebollo J. Length of the first metatarsal and hallux in hallux valgus in the initial stage. Int Orthop 2007; DOI 10.1007/s00264-007-0350-9.

  22. Munuera PV, Domínguez G, Polo J, Rebollo J. Medial deviation of the first metatarsal in incipient hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 1030–1035.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Munuera PV, Domínguez G, Castillo JM. Radiographic study about the size of the first metatarso-digital segment in feet with hallux limitus in initial phase. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2007; (in press).

  24. Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Takaoka T, Akiyama K, Fujii T, Tamai S. Radiographic analysis of hallux valgus in women on weightbearing and nonweightbearing. Clin Orthop 1997; 336: 186–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coughlin MJ, Saltzman CL, Nunley JA. Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society on angular measurements. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 68–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aseyo D, Nathan H. Hallux sesamoid bones. Anatomical observations with special reference to osteoarthritis and hallux valgus. Int Orthop 1984; 8: 67–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kiter E, Acalla S, Alper Kiliç B, Demirkan F. Distribution of the metatarsophalangeal sesamoids in Turkish subjects. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2006; 96: 437–441.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kewenter Y. Die Sesambeine des 1. Metatarsophalangealgegenks des Menschen. Acta Orthop Scand 1936; 2 (Suppl.): 1–113.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dobas DC, Silvers MD. The frequency of partite sesamoids of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Am Podiatr Assoc 1977; 67: 880–882.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodeo SA, Warren RF, O’Brien SJ, Pavlov H, Barnes R, Hanks GA. Diastasis of bipartite sesamoids of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle 1993; 14: 425–434.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenbaum de Britto S. The first metatarso-sesamoid joint. Int Orthop 1982; 6: 61–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. García A, Parkes JC. Fracturas del pie. In: Giannestras NJ, editor. Trastornos del Pie. Barcelona: Salvat Editores; 1979: 507–554.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aper RL, Saltzman CL, Brown TD. The effect of hallux sesamoid resection on the effective moment of the flexor hallucis brevis. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15: 462–470.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Michaud TC. Foot orthoses and other forms of conservative foot care. Massachusetts: Williams and Wilkins; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Iida M, Basmajian JV. Electromyography of hallux valgus. Clin Orthop 1974; 101: 220–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Aper RL, Saltzman CL, Brown TD. The effect of hallux sesamoid excision on the flexor hallucis longus moment arm. Clin Orthop 1996; 325: 209–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro V. Munuera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munuera, P.V., Domínguez, G., Reina, M. et al. Bipartite hallucal sesamoid bones: relationship with hallux valgus and metatarsal index. Skeletal Radiol 36, 1043–1050 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0359-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-007-0359-6

Keywords

Navigation