Skip to main content
Log in

A seismic landslide hazard analysis with topographic effect, a case study in the 99 Peaks region, Central Taiwan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

It has been known that ground motion amplitude will be amplified at mountaintops; however, such topographic effects are not included in conventional landslide hazard models. In this study, a modified procedure that considers the topographic effects is proposed to analyze the seismic landslide hazard. The topographic effect is estimated by back analysis. First, a 3D dynamic numerical model with irregular topography is constructed. The theoretical topographic amplification factors are derived from the dynamic numerical model. The ground motion record is regarded as the reference motion in the plane area. By combining the topographic amplification factors with the reference motions, the amplified acceleration time history and amplified seismic intensity parameters are obtained. Newmark’s displacement model is chosen to perform the seismic landslide hazard analysis. By combining the regression equation and the seismic parameter of peak ground acceleration and Arias intensity, the Newmark’s displacement distribution is generated. Subsequently, the calculated Newmark’s displacement maps are transformed to the hazard maps. The landslide hazard maps of the 99 Peaks region, Central Taiwan are evaluated. The actual landslide inventory maps triggered by the 21 September 1999, Chi-Chi earthquake are compared with the calculated hazard maps. Relative to the conventional procedure, the results show that the proposed procedures, which include the topographic effect can obtain a better result for seismic landslide hazard analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hansen RJ (ed) Seismic design for nuclear power plants. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, pp 438–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Assimaki D, Gazetas G, Kausel E (2005) Effects of local soil conditions on the topographic aggravation of seismic motion: parametric investigation and recorded field evidence from the 1999 Athens earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(3):1059–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard P-Y, Riepl-Thomas J (1999) Wave propagation in complex geological structures and their effects on strong ground motion. In: Kausel E, Manolis G (ed) Wave motion in earthquake engineering, international series advances in earthquake engineering. WIT Press, Boston, pp 37–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Celebi M (1987) Topographical and geological amplifications determined from strong-motion and aftershock records of the 3 March 1985 Chile earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77(4):1147–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Geological Survey (1990) 1/500,000 Geological Map of Taiwan Area

  • Chandler AM, Lam NTK, Tsang HH (2006) Near-surface attenuation modelling based on rock shear-wave velocity profile. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(11):1004–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HJ (1996) The physical properties and mechanical behavior of soft sandstone in middle northen Taiwan. Dissertation, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan (in Chinese)

  • Chen H, Wan JP (2004) The effect of orientation and shape distribution of gravel on slope angles in central Taiwan. Eng Geol 72(1–2):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SC, Wu CH (2006) Slope stabilization and landslide size on Mt. 99 Peaks after Chichi Earthquake in Taiwan. Environ Geol 50(5):623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJ, Fabbri AF (1997) Sensitivity analysis of quantitative prediction models based on map overlays: an application to landslide hazard zonation. Proceedings of the Int. Congr, Geomorphology, Bologna, Italy, 28 August–3 September 1997

  • Densmore AL, Hovius N (2000) Topographic fingerprints of bedrock landslides. Geology 28(4):371–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geli L, Bard PY, Jullien B (1988) The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: a review and new results. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78(1):42–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham J (1984) Methods of stability analysis. In: Brundsen D, Prior DB (ed) Slope instability. Wiley, New York, pp 523–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves RW, Wald DJ (2004) Observed and simulated ground motions in the San Bernardino basin region for the hector mine, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(1):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harp EL, Keefer DK (1990) Landslides triggered by the earthquake. In: Rymer MJ, Ellsworth WL (ed) The Coalinga, California, Earthquake of May 2, 1983, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1487, pp 335–347

  • Harp EL, Wilson RC, Wieczorek, GF (1981) Landslides from the February 4, 1976, Guatemala earthquake, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1204-A, 35p

  • Jibson RW (2007) Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Eng Geol 91(2–4):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jibson RW, Harp EL, Michael JA (2000) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. Eng Geol 58(3–4):271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) (1994) Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency Report FEMA 222A, Washington, D.C., 290 pp

  • Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquake on dams and embankments. Geotechnique 15(2):139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohminato T, Chouet BA (1997) A free-surface boundary condition for including 3D topography in the finite-difference method. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(2):494–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci R (2002) Amplification of earthquake ground motion by steep topographic irregularities. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(10):1831–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva W, Darragh R, Gregor N (1998) Reassessment of site coefficients and near-fault factors for building code provisions. Pacific Engineering and Analysis Report 98-HQ-GR-1010

  • Sinotech Engineering Consultants (1999) The geological exploration and experiment report of the traffic plan in Taichung, Urban Development Bureau of Taiwan

  • Siro L (1982) Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake. Proceedings of the seventh European conference on earthquake engineering, Athens, Greece, 20–25 September 1982, Technical chamber of Greece, 7, pp 419–429

  • Tseng TK (2002) The numerical simulation of seepage phenomenon of excavations around tunnel. Dissertation, National Chung Yuan University, Taiwan (in Chinese)

  • Xie MW, Esaki T, Zhou GY, Mitani Y (2003) Three-dimensional stability evaluation of landslides and a sliding process simulation using a new geographic information systems component. Environ Geol 43(5):503–512

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ting-To Yu (NCKU Satellite Geoinformatics Research Centre) for providing us with the digital elevation model and the Industrial Technology Research Institute for providing us with the digital inventory of landslides triggered by the Chi-Chi earthquake, which have led to significant improvement of this article. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Fei Peng.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

S1. Geologic map of the 99 Peaks region (JPG 286 kb)

S2. Location of the landslide triggered by Chi-Chi earthquake on the 99 Peaks region (JPG 402 kb)

254_2008_1323_MOESM3_ESM.jpg

S3. Seismic map generated by the 1999, Chi-Chi earthquake (The rectangular region is the study area). (a) PGA map (JPG 203 kb)

254_2008_1323_MOESM4_ESM.jpg

S4. Seismic map generated by the 1999, Chi-Chi earthquake (The rectangular region is the study area). (b) Arias intensity map(JPG 204 kb)

S5. Ground acceleration of Chi-Chi earthquake recorded at station TCU052. (a) In the NS direction(TIF 156 kb)

S6. Ground acceleration of Chi-Chi earthquake recorded at station TCU052. (b) In the EW direction(TIF 158 kb)

254_2008_1323_MOESM7_ESM.jpg

S7. Newmark’s displacement map. (a) The Newmark’s displacement map generated by the procedure with topography effect (JPG 534 kb)

254_2008_1323_MOESM8_ESM.jpg

S8. Newmark’s displacement map. (b) The Newmark’s displacement map generated by the procedure without topography effect(JPG 587 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peng, WF., Wang, CL., Chen, ST. et al. A seismic landslide hazard analysis with topographic effect, a case study in the 99 Peaks region, Central Taiwan. Environ Geol 57, 537–549 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1323-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1323-z

Keywords

Navigation