Abstract
We apply the logic of clinical epidemiological studies to quantify the accuracy of mapping sinkholes by ALSM in the 750 km2 Pinellas County. By such studies, a new diagnostic procedure is tested by comparing the diagnoses in a clinical trial to diagnoses on the same patients from a more reliable, but more elaborate and expensive procedure (“gold standard” in epidemiological context). A relatively undeveloped, 65 km2 focus area where we have aerial photographs that are effectively contemporaneous with the ALSM flights serves as the “clinical trial”. The xy-locations in the focus area are the “patients” in the trial. The “diagnostic test” for having “sinkhole disease” is inclusion in a database of sinkhole polygons delimited by ALSM contours (“ALSM-alone”), as detailed in Part 1. The standard of comparison (“gold standard” would be an overstatement in the absence of geophysical testing) is inclusion in a database of sinkhole outlines derived by best judgment of conjunctive interpretation of ALSM and aerial photography. GIS intersections that indicate the sensitivity and specificity of the test (ALSM-alone) are 43 and 98.3%, respectively, and, in the focus area where the prevalence of “sinkhole disease” is 4.7%, the positive and negative predictive values are 55.5 and 97.2%, respectively. Over much of the rest of the county, where only the test can be applied, the prevalence of sinkholes is sufficiently small that it cannot be determined to be any different from zero given the paucity of interpreted sinkholes (positive diagnoses) and the low specificity of the test method. The conclusion, therefore, is that contemporaneous aerial photography is essential to compile an ALSM-derived database that aims to state that the given xy-points lay inside or outside of topographic depressions in the covered karst of west-central Florida.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brinkmann R, Wilson K, Elko N, Seale L, Florea LJ, Vacher HL (2007) Sinkhole distribution based on pre-development mapping in urbanized Pinellas County, Florida, USA. In: Parise M, Gunn J (eds) Natural and anthropogenic hazards in karst areas: recognition, analysis and mitigation, Geological Society, London, Special Publication 279, pp 5–11
Dobecki TL, Upchurch SB (2006) Geophysical applications to detect sinkholes and ground subsidence. Lead Edge 25:336–341
Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH (1996) Clinical epidemiology, the essentials, 3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, p 276
Kruse S, Grasmueck M, Weiss M, Viggiano D (2006) Sinkhole structure mapping in covered karst terrain. Geophys Res Lett 33:L16495 doi:10.1029/2006GLO16975
Pagano M, Gauvreau K (2000) Principles of biostatistics, 2nd edn. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, p 525
Seale LD, Florea LJ, Brinkmann R, Vacher HL (2007) Using ALSM to identify closed depressions in the urbanized, covered karst of Pinellas County, Florida—1, methodological considerations. Environ Geol (this issue). doi:10.1007/s00254-007-0890-8
Scheidt J, Lerche I, Paleologos E (2005) Environmental and economic risks from sinkholes in west-central Florida. Environ Geosci 12:207–217
Seale LD (2005) Creation, analysis, and evaluation of remote-sensing sinkhole databases for Pinellas County, Florida. Masters thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, p 55
Tihansky AB (1999) Sinkholes, west-central Florida. In: Galloway D, Jones DR, Ingebritsen SE (eds) Land Subsidence in the United States. US Geological Survey circular 1182, p 177
Upchurch SB, Randazzo AF (1997) Environmental geology of Florida. In: Randazzo AF, Jones DS (eds) The geology of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp 217–249
Wilson KV (2004) Modification of Karst depressions by urbanization in Pinellas County, Florida. Masters thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, p 60
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vacher, H.L., Seale, L.D., Florea, L.J. et al. Using ALSM to map sinkholes in the urbanized covered karst of Pinellas County, Florida—2. Accuracy statistics. Environ Geol 54, 1007–1015 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0891-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0891-7