Skip to main content

Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approaches

Abstract

The paper compares the results of two studies of salt damage at the Wakefield Tower, Tower of London. The first, in 1993, was based on semi-quantitative salt analysis and hygroscopicity measurements. The second was based on quantitative analysis and a thermodynamic model, ECOS. Both studies aimed to predict environmental conditions that would minimise salt damage to the interior stonework. Their predictions are markedly different, and this paper examines the reasons for the differences. It is shown that hygroscopicity alone is not a reliable indicator of crystallisation from mixed salt solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Notes

  1. Steiger has queried the detailed ECOS predictions, noting that anhydrous calcium nitrate is stable only below about 10% RH, and that ECOS seemingly omits the double salt KNO3.Ca(NO3)2.3H2O. Nonetheless, he does not consider that the main conclusions are affected (Steiger, Institut für Anorganische und Angewandte Chemie, Universität Hamburg, personal communication, 2006).

  2. data from London City Airport, 9 km from the Tower and, like the Tower, beside the River Thames.

References

  • Arnold A, Zehnder K (1991) Monitoring wall paintings affected by soluble salts. In: The conservation of wall paintings. Proceedings of a symposium organized by the Courtauld Institute of Art and the Getty Conservation Institute, London, 13–16 July, 1987. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, pp 103–135

  • Brown RA, Curnow PE (1984) Tower of London. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Church LAR (2003) An investigation into the deterioration of Reigate stone at the Wakefield Tower, HM Tower of London. MA dissertation, Institute of Archaeology, University College London

  • Parnell G (1993) The tower of London. Batsford, London

  • Price CA (1993) Preventive conservation of salt-contaminated masonry in the Wakefield Tower, HM Tower of London. Bull Inst Archaeol 29:121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Price CA (ed) (2000) An expert chemical model for determining the environmental conditions needed to prevent salt damage in porous materials. European Commission, Protection and Conservation of European Cultural Heritage, Research Report 11. Archetype, London

  • Price CA, Brimblecombe P (1994) Preventing salt damage in porous materials. In: Preventive conservation: practice, theory and research. International Institute for Conservation, London, pp 90–93

  • Sanderson R, Garner K (2001) Conservation of Reigate Stone at Hampton Court Palace and HM Tower of London. J Archit Conserv (3):7–23

  • Steiger M, Dannecker W (1995) Hygroskopische Eigenschaften und Kristallisationsverhalten von Salzgemischen (Hygroscopic properties and crystallization behaviour of salt mixtures). In: Snethlage R (ed) Jahresberichte aus dem Forschungsprogramm Steinzerfall, Steinkonservierung. Band 5, 1993. Ernst Wilhelm und Sohn, Berlin, pp 115–128

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Laura Church for undertaking the analyses and to the Natural Environment Research Council for use of ICP-AES and IC facilities. Petros Prokos suggested the removal of calcium to balance the charges in RUNSALT, and Michael Steiger calculated the predicted hygroscopicities. I am grateful to Historic Royal Palaces for the opportunity to undertake the research and to publish the results, to Kathryn Hallett for generously providing the environmental data, and to Konrad Zehnder and an anonymous referee for their constructive suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifford A. Price.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, C.A. Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: a comparison of two approaches. Environ Geol 52, 369–374 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9

Keywords

  • Stone
  • Conservation
  • Salt
  • Environmental control
  • Hygroscopicity