Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interpreting sustainable yield of an aquifer using a fuzzy framework

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Reliable estimates for how much water can be safely withdrawn from aquifers without harming the environment is crucial for identifying new water supply sources and fostering sustainable growth. Methodologies to estimate groundwater availability that are rooted in science and yet accomplishable with minimal data are particularly useful for effectual aquifer management. Also, as groundwater management is increasingly becoming a participatory process, these methodologies must be transparent and easily understood by a wide range of audiences. In addition, proposed approaches must also reconcile imprecision and uncertainties arising from lack of data, differences in stakeholders’ perceptions and limitations associated with incomplete aquifer characterization. In this study, the fundamental concept of water balance is coupled with fuzzy regression to develop a scheme for assessing regional-scale groundwater availability. Using the mass-balance approach, anthropogenic water demands (municipal, industrial and agricultural) and ecological demands (baseflows to rivers) can be incorporated into the availability estimation process. The use of fuzzy regression enables the specification of decision makers’ preferences to the adopted procedure and renders the parameter estimation to be more robust in the presence of extreme values. The methodology is illustrated by using it to estimate groundwater availability in the Gulf coast aquifer, underlying Refugio County, TX, USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Baker ET (1979) Stratigraphic and hydrogeological framework of part of the coastal plain of Texas. Texas Department of Water Resources report 236, Austin, Texas, pp 43

  • Bardossy A, Bogardi I, Duckstein L (1990) Fuzzy regression in hydrology. Water Resour Res 26:1497–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang YHO, Ayyub BM (2001) Fuzzy regression methods—a comparative assessment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 119(2):187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman TG, Malone RW (2002) Comparison of models for estimation of groundwater recharge, using data from a deep weighing lysimeter. Math Comput Simul 59:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS (2001) Outliers detection and confidence interval modification in fuzzy regression. Fuzzy Sets Syst 119:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow V (1964) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravey D, Uddameri V (2003) Ground water discharges into the South Texas coastal bend bay and estuary system—a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Texas Water Summit: focusing on water for agriculture and natural resources, Nov 5–6, 2003, Austin, Texas

  • De Laat PJM (1995) Design and operation of a subsurface irrigation scheme with MUST. In: Pereira LS, van den Broek BJ, Kabat P, Allen RG (eds) Crop–water-simulation models in practice. Wageningen Pers, The Netherlands, pp 123–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeze A, Cherry J (1979) Ground water hydrology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelhar LW (1993) Stochastic subsurface hydrology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennon RJ (2001) Water follies: groundwater pumping and the fate of America’s fresh waters. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Green WH, Ampt G (1911) Studies of soil physics, part I—the flow of air and water through soils. J Agric Sci 4:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadalupe Blanco River Authority (GBRA) http://www.gbra.org (accessed on Aug, 2003)

  • Gujarati D (1979) Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1993) Estimation, inference, and forecasting of time-series subject to changes in regime. In: Maddala GD, Rao CR, Vinod HD (eds) Handbook of statistics 11:231–259

  • Kim KJ, Moskowitz H, Koksalan M (1996) Fuzzy versus statistical linear regression. Eur J Oper Res 92(2):417–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchanur M, Uddameri V, Cravey D (2003) An assessment of groundwater resources in Refugio County, TX—a report submitted to Refugio Groundwater Conservation District

  • Lane PNJ, Morris J, Ningnan Z, Guangyi Z, Guoyi Z, Daping X (2004) Water balance of tropical eucalypt plantations in south-eastern China. Agric For Meteorol 124(3–4):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace R, Mullican W, Way TS (2001) Estimating groundwater availability in Texas: 2000. In: Proceedings of the 1st annual Texas Rural Water Association and Texas Water Conservation Association Water Law Seminar: “Water allocation in Texas: The Legal Issues, “ Austin, Texas, January 25–26, 2001

  • Maidment D (1993) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason C (1963) Ground water resources of Refugio County, TX. Texas Water Commission Bulletin 6312, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuen R (1998) Hydrologic analysis and design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Meigh JR, McKenzie AA, Sene KJ (1999) A grid-based approach to water scarcity estimates for Eastern and Southern Africa. Water Resour Manage 13:85–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norwine JR (ed) (1995) The changing climate of Texas: predictability and implications for the future. GeoBooks, Cartographics, TAMU

  • Peters G (1994) Fuzzy linear regression with fuzzy intervals. Fuzzy Sets Syst 63:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettyjohn WA, Henning R (1979) Preliminary estimate of ground-water recharge rates, related streamflow and water quality in Ohio: Ohio State University Water Resources Center Project Completion Report Number 552, 323

  • Pinder GF, Celia M, Gray WG (1981) Velocity calculation from randomly located hydraulic heads. Groundwater 19(3):262–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Raes D, Deproost P (2003) Model to assess water movement from a shallow water table to the root zone. Agric Water Manage 62:79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savic DA, Pedrycz W (1991) Evaluation of fuzzy linear regression models. Fuzzy Sets Syst 39:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon BR, Mace RE, Barrett ME, Smith B (2003) Can we stimulate regional groundwater flow in a karst system using equivalent porous media models? Case study, Barton Springs Edwards aquifer, USA. J Hydrol 276:137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H, Uejima S, Asai K (1982) Linear regression analysis with fuzzy model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 12(6):903–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) (2001) Population and water demand data http://www.twdb.state.tx.us (accessed on Aug, 2003)

  • Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) (2003) Texas groundwater database http://www.twdb.state.tx.us (accessed on Aug, 2003)

  • Uddameri V (2004) Relationships of longitudinal dispersivity and scale developed from fuzzy least square regression. Environ Geol 45(8):1172–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (2000) http://www.census.gov (accessed on Aug, 2003)

  • Weltz MA, Blackburn WH (1995) Water budget for south Texas rangelands. J Range Manage 48:45–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial assistance from the Refugio Groundwater Conservation District and the United States Geological Survey through the Texas Water Resources Institute is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Uddameri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uddameri, V., Honnungar, V. Interpreting sustainable yield of an aquifer using a fuzzy framework. Environ Geol 51, 911–919 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0454-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0454-3

Keywords