Environmental Geology

, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp 987–997 | Cite as

A field application for lime stabilization

Original Article

Abstract

This study presents the improvements achieved as a result of the lime stabilization application conducted by the joint effort of the Turkish Association of Lime Industrialists and the General Directorate of Rural Services on the 200 m long section of the Ankara Province Yukarı Yurtçu Village road where green and brown clays are dominant. The study also numerically demonstrates the impacts of these improvements on the road section based on the results of various laboratory and field tests. The lime stabilization in field conditions was performed with 5% lime for both clays and was applied as a 30 cm thick single layer. In the soaked California bearing-ratio (CBR) tests conducted in the laboratory, increases that reach up from 16 and 21 times compared to initial soaked CBR values were observed in green and brown clays, respectively, at the end of 28 days. The high increases observed in soaked CBR values would reduce the upper layer thickness of the roads. The similar improvements are also achieved in unconfined compression and plate loading tests. The comparisons performed with the plate loading tests clearly demonstrated the behavior of the surface to lime and its cure impact.

Keywords

Lime stabilization Clay soils Plate loading CBR 

References

  1. Baykal GI (1987) The effect of micromorphological development on the elastic moduli of fly ash, lime stabilized bentonite. Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Broderick GP, Daniel DE (1990) Stabilizing compacted clay against chemical attack. ASCE J Geotech Eng Div 116(10):1549–1567Google Scholar
  3. Clare KE, Crunchley AE (1957) Laboratory experiments in the stabilization of clays with hydrated lime. Geotechnique VIII:97–111Google Scholar
  4. Eades JE, Grim RE (1963) A quick test to determine lime requirements for lime stabilization. Highway Research Board, Record No. 139, pp 61–72Google Scholar
  5. Ingles OG, Metcalf JB (1972) Lime stabilization, soil stabilization, Melbourne, pp 127–167Google Scholar
  6. Kavak A (1996) The behavior of lime stabilized clays under cyclic loading. Ph.D. dissertation, Bogazici UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Kavak A, Baykal GI (2001) The behavior of lime-stabilized clays subjected to repeated loading. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  8. Kavak A, Keskin E, Yılmaz C, Mutman U (2005) Lime stabilization and its effects on road cross-section. GEOPROB 2005—international conference on problematic soils, Famagusta, N. Cyprus, 25–27 May 2005Google Scholar
  9. Newbauer CH, Thompson MR (1972) Stability properties of uncured lime-treated fine grained soils. Highway Research Record 381, HRB. National Research Council, Washington DC, pp 20–26Google Scholar
  10. Rao S, Shivananda P (2005) Impact of sulfate contamination on swelling behaviour of lime-stabilized clays. J ASTM Int 2(4):1–10Google Scholar
  11. Thomson MR (1969) Engineering properties of lime-soil mixtures. J Mater ASTM 4(4):968–969Google Scholar
  12. Veith G (2000) Essay competition green, ground and great: soil stabilization with slag. Build Res Inf 28(1):70–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wild S, Kinuthia JM, Jones GI, Higgins DD (1999) Suppression of swelling associated with ettringite formation in lime stabilized sulphate bearing clay soils by partial substitution of lime with ground granulated blastfurnace slag. Eng Geol 51:257–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentKocaeli UniversityIzmit, KocaeliTurkey
  2. 2.Turkish Lime AssociationİstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations